116T of UA BOMBER
Anyone tried doing thermal spread on the components, I'd like to know how engineering might change the heat issue it seems to have.
I don't need to sell you on the Beluga, OP.
It sells itself, just look at it
I did, overcharged grade 5 power plant with thermal spread and increased range grade 5 FSD with thermal spread. Heat is well under control.
I did, overcharged grade 5 power plant with thermal spread and increased range grade 5 FSD with thermal spread. Heat is well under control.
Really? I wasn't even satisfied with G5 Armoured's heat reduction and engineered a new PP with G2 Low Emissions. After some testing the thrusters ended up as 7D G5 Clean + Drag. In conjunction I also dropped the idea of having it armed with pack-hounds for the lols, the power and heat capacity of the Beluga just seem too low for this to be practical. All those concessions now finally allow my space whale to stay below 100% heat almost all the time, be it during scooping a star while aligning for the next jump, of boosting away at 90 degrees from a planet surface while simultaneously charging the FSD.
Hmmm so the salesman have failed to put a positive spin on the heat generation of this flying BBQ rack. Poor show. Dont we have some jokesters out there who can at least make this mediocre ship into some good humor?
High efficiency toaster oven included! Just put it in park and enjoy a nice hot breakfast! No extra power draw on your busy, busy distributor. Cook on the go, no need to wait!*
*Tinfoil suit not included. We are not responsible for excessive heat build-up, melted control surfaces, and/or death. Use with caution.
Indeed, I'm calling **** on that statement too. I went low-emissions PP, Shield, and clean drives and it could finally scoop one jump of fuel without hitting 100% but it's definitely still on the toasty side. It shouldn't need all those engineering concessions just so it doesn't fail as a ship.