We all know that dumping exploration data gives a nice boost to influence for the ruling faction of the station where the data is sold. But what exactly determines the size of the boost?
(a) Credit value?
(b) Number of objects scanned?
(c) Number of systems scanned?
The answer makes a difference to anyone tempted to go exploring specifically for BGS work, because it affects what targets you are seeking.
If (a), then scanning high-value planets is best - following the Road to Riches, for example.
If (b), then scanning every iceball in a large unexplored system with lots of moons might be the way to go.
If (c), then quick-and-shoddy scans of just the star is all that;'s needed.
I'm guessing (c), simply because (c) is what counts for Exploration CGs and I'm assuming the crediting mechanism is the same. But does anyone know one way or the other?
Finally, what's the cap on exploration-derived influence? I'd hate to "waste" data getting dumped when it's not doing any good.
(a) Credit value?
(b) Number of objects scanned?
(c) Number of systems scanned?
The answer makes a difference to anyone tempted to go exploring specifically for BGS work, because it affects what targets you are seeking.
If (a), then scanning high-value planets is best - following the Road to Riches, for example.
If (b), then scanning every iceball in a large unexplored system with lots of moons might be the way to go.
If (c), then quick-and-shoddy scans of just the star is all that;'s needed.
I'm guessing (c), simply because (c) is what counts for Exploration CGs and I'm assuming the crediting mechanism is the same. But does anyone know one way or the other?
Finally, what's the cap on exploration-derived influence? I'd hate to "waste" data getting dumped when it's not doing any good.