Semantics: Multi-Crew

[the100thmonkey]

If you're talking semantics, you have to include the communicative principle.

Basically, ask yourself the question "did I understand what my interlocutor meant clearly and unambiguously?"

If the answer is yes, the discussion on semantics is effectively over. Everything else is navel-gazing and nitpicking at the same time.

 

[Dbrn47]

If you're talking semantics, you have to include the communicative principle.

Basically, ask yourself the question "did I understand what my interlocutor meant clearly and unambiguously?"

If the answer is yes, the discussion on semantics is effectively over. Everything else is navel-gazing and nitpicking at the same time.

You aren't new, surely you know that navel-gazing and nitpicking is simply what we do here at forums.frontier.co.uk? This discussion isn't truly over until someone from FDev clears up the reasoning, but it was made with the expectation that no one would care enough to engage, as is typical with a semantics discussion. Yet, here we are.

While we are nitpicking, who actually uses the word "interlocutor" aside from you, this one time? [haha]

 

[the100thmonkey]

You aren't new, surely you know that navel-gazing and nitpicking is simply what we do here at forums.frontier.co.uk? This discussion isn't truly over until someone from FDev clears up the reasoning, but it was made with the expectation that no one would care enough to engage, as is typical with a semantics discussion. Yet, here we are.

While we are nitpicking, who actually uses the word "interlocutor" aside from you, this one time? [haha]

In my line of work, it's quite common!

 

[Ginrikuzuma]

Perhaps its simply meant to describe the fact we already have wings and within those wings we will be able to have multiple crews (lots of the large ships have 2-3 seats in what you could call the bridge and players can have a wing of 4 so you could have multiple crews consisting of a total of 8-12 players in an instance perhaps [especially when you pair that together with the ship-launched fighters perhaps?)

 

[davedf]

Now why didn't I think of that? Very good point. Have some rep, good sir. [up]

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -



And some rep for you too (don't let Yaffle beat you to it again)

Thanks. Reading my comment again though it sounded like a statement of fact where it was intended as a supposition.

[I felt guily and passed some rep to yafffle ]