Ship/car comparisons

given how bad the RX8 is on fuel, I suggest it would be a better fit for the eagle as it currently stands ;)

I was getting 16-18mpg, it's not that bad. I even joined the "200 Club" a couple of times (200 miles on one tank).

Car1.jpg
Car2.jpg
 
I was getting 16-18mpg, it's not that bad. I even joined the "200 Club" a couple of times (200 miles on one tank).

Car1.jpg
Car2.jpg

LOL nice car, but <18mpg IS that bad. For that fuel economy I want something bordering on a supercar.

In comparison I get >27mpg, (which is still rubbish) but is still pushing 500 miles out of a £100 tank of fuel.

I am sticking with it, I reckon the eagle is the year 3300 equivalent of the RX8 :p
 
I was getting 16-18mpg, it's not that bad. I even joined the "200 Club" a couple of times (200 miles on one tank).

Car1.jpg
Car2.jpg

LOL nice car, but <18mpg IS that bad. For that fuel economy I want something bordering on a supercar.

In comparison I get >27mpg, (which is still rubbish) but is still pushing 500 miles out of a £100 tank of fuel.

I am sticking with it, I reckon the eagle is the year 3300 equivalent of the RX8 :p

I got ~25 MPG in mine (It was black. I had to sell it - after 100,000 miles, the rotor tips were wearing out :-( ) but that was mostly motorway driving.
Yes, it IS a nice car, and at 230 BPH, as close to a supercar as most people could ever get.

WAY better than an Eagle:
L-Smart-Roadster-12.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom