well, I WAS going to wast materials for a good laugh (already knowing they are not going to be useful) but then I saw the videos of the tests.....
86+16 rounds in clip?! (unless there was some serious shooting before hand) that is sadder than sad given it's 10-13 dam per shot (gimballed and fixed) yes, that is quite potent if fired very fast. but we do have railguns, PA's and frag cannons that leave this thing in the wake with damage and ammo capacity.
I will show you 2 I have seen on youtube. one details how almost all the ammunition could barely break an anaconda's shields, the other shows it's ineffectiveness against Eagles....
[video=youtube;pXrraBPid0o]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXrraBPid0o[/video]
[video=youtube;iFamZCQ1vtY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFamZCQ1vtY[/video]
Even if this thing could be engineered, how on earth is it going to be worth the materials required?!
Even if this thing cost 1/10th of the materials, it would be questionable of it's worth... there are plenty of really good engineer-able modules out there!
86+16 rounds in clip?! (unless there was some serious shooting before hand) that is sadder than sad given it's 10-13 dam per shot (gimballed and fixed) yes, that is quite potent if fired very fast. but we do have railguns, PA's and frag cannons that leave this thing in the wake with damage and ammo capacity.
I will show you 2 I have seen on youtube. one details how almost all the ammunition could barely break an anaconda's shields, the other shows it's ineffectiveness against Eagles....
[video=youtube;pXrraBPid0o]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXrraBPid0o[/video]
[video=youtube;iFamZCQ1vtY]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFamZCQ1vtY[/video]
Even if this thing could be engineered, how on earth is it going to be worth the materials required?!
Even if this thing cost 1/10th of the materials, it would be questionable of it's worth... there are plenty of really good engineer-able modules out there!