How are Frontier going to cover ED operating costs then? These costs have to cover:
- Maintaing servers
- Paying staff to maintain above servers (yes they may be using Amazon cloud, but FD staff will need to look after their applications)
- Injecting events (as part of the evolving universe)
- Paying staff to come up with such events (we love the game, they love the game but they aren't going to do it voluntarily)
The fact is, a lot of people have expressed displeasure at subscriptions, cash for credits and MTs and yet they want a rich and evolving universe. Greedy much?
Personally, I would rather have MTs than subscriptions as my play frequency is probably not going to justify it. And I hope FD keep pumping out more purchasable stuff - as long as it does not enter pay to win territory.
People always bring up this argument. HOW DO THEY SERVER.
But that doesn't make sense. From what I can see here on the forums, most people want mainly PVE. In which case I can host my own server to play with friends. People can host servers, it's pc gaming.
I can go play Call of Duty 4, that came out 7 years ago.
The battlefield 2 servers went down about a month ago, that came out in 2005.
Games have been around with multiplayer a long long time without micro transactions. Once again, micro transactions exist as a way for free to play games to make money.
If they want their game to be around for 10 years, then you release an expansion pack, have large updates that bring more players. That's how you do it.
People bought the lifetime expansion pass so they would have everything.
I like having completed games and am not even a fan of the idea that the game is releasing and there is already DLC planned but thats another conversation all together.
They don't 'need' the micro transactions.