Sol has changed

DING! DING! A Winner!!!

And... that, my friend is the OPs point!

No the point is that planet Vulcan was postulated in an attempt to account for perturbations in Mercury's orbit, these were subsequently explained by Einstein's "general relativity".

The hypothetical "Persephone" (I don't know why F D decided to opt for that name as I have only seen that used in fiction) or rather Planet 9 has a rather high probability of existing, according to the modelling.

In the meantime, Vulcan enthusiasts can consider Charon where there is a "Vulcan Planum" which has several other Star Trek names used in it's features.
 
No the point is that planet Vulcan was postulated in an attempt to account for perturbations in Mercury's orbit, these were subsequently explained by Einstein's "general relativity".

The hypothetical "Persephone" (I don't know why F D decided to opt for that name as I have only seen that used in fiction) or rather Planet 9 has a rather high probability of existing, according to the modelling.

In the meantime, Vulcan enthusiasts can consider Charon where there is a "Vulcan Planum" which has several other Star Trek names used in it's features.

Actually, that was the point of the post, and many of those following the OP. There is a semantic difference: We know it doesn't exist / We don't yet know that it exists. But either way, it's not been discovered or observed.
 
Actually, that was the point of the post, and many of those following the OP. There is a semantic difference: We know it doesn't exist / We don't yet know that it exists. But either way, it's not been discovered or observed.


Well the OP posted:

"Whaaaat....
Persephone? what the hell is this? Are there any lore justification for it?"


So not exactly the point of the post really.

Anywayup, upgrade done, back to important things...

Where's me HOTAS.....

[hotas]
 
BUT WHERE IS NIBIRU?! lol

Well, it's either Jupiter or a semi-mythological reference to the upper culmination point of a planet of significant importance to the Sumerian people, most likely connected to fertility or agriculture. There is no reference to a race of strangers coming from the stars. Well, there are some... but that's a different story... :cool:
 
But either way, it's not been discovered or observed.

But it has been observed! Just not directly. Did you need read the posts about the discovery of Neptune? Planet 9 (or Persephone as we appear to have named it in 1000 years time) was discovered in the same fashion. Grab your telescope and join the hunt to be the first one to see it directly.

:D S
 
At least that's according to the comments section of discovery.com and the History Channel.
Just as an aside, have you wandered into the comments sections on Space.com? That there is a whole new realm of bizarre. I genuinely do not get why people who actively hate and reject science, and think it's all part of the evil plan of the Illuminati liberal social-justice-warrior Hillary-voting globalist new-world-order elites, bother to spend their time reading a science site and commenting on it.

Actually, no; yes, I do. It's because they're People On The Internet, isn't it? [rolleyes]
 
Regarding Persephone, could it be that people in the year 3302 know more than us 21st century monkeys? And no one's complained that Mars has water all over it yet...
:)

Terraformed obviously. I just want to know what happened to its moons...

...and also why FD calls our moon "The Moon" instead of Luna since they call our sun "Sol".
 
Back
Top Bottom