My main concern right now are the game breaking issues with 1.1 which have yet to be fixed.
My only hope is that they fix them before it's released... otherwise these forums will be 10x worse than they already are.
So you're falling back on the old "bait-and-switch false advertising" argument? I don't buy that one at all, Elite Dangerous is exactly what I was expecting when I signed up. You'd have to willfully delude yourself to expect anything else.
Well that's where the analogy breaks down, of course.
you'd think David Braben personally sentenced them to roll a boulder uphill for all eternity.
I have read so many complaints about the 1.1 Beta patch.
I think everyone needs to stop bashing FD because they have a vision and are moving forward with it, regardless of player input.
Games like SWG and Tabula Rasa have proven that listening to the majority of one's customer base isn't that important.
is that in the Planetary landings expansion?
Its been hard to look at the forums without bumping into the downer-posts created by a toxic cocktail of soaring expectations and little patience.
+1 rep - agree fully with both points.
That's one way of looking at it. And yes, i do hope they are going ahead with their vision instead of listening to the playerbase too much (although of course they should listen to feedback, but not let it dilute where they want to go (see my previous post - or possibly this one will be merged with it). And majority? Erm, more likely the vocal minority if you are referring to the dozen or so who spend all their time complaining.
If you don't know their vision, then you haven't looked at the DDF or dev diaries. Perhaps you should check them out. Don't take them as gospel, like some holy doctrine, they are just discussions and ideas, only Mr B knows the exact direction he wants to go with this, and he is allowed to change his mind as the game evolves.
I have checked out the Dev Diaries, that's not a vision. It's a rambling/brainstorming of ideas. Too bad you are so dismissive of the "complainers". they are the only ones that pressure devs to make positive changes. Fanboys never do. The game lacks any vision, you can play the game for a while and figure that out. The constant nerfing, poor support, wasted allocation of reasource, etc.....
Fact is, if the game doesn't show significant improvement in 1.1, I think we can expect a demise of this game within a year. If you notice, most people out here aren't using the word "fun" with the game. But the word "grind" is pervasive.
Fact is, if the game doesn't show significant improvement in 1.1, I think we can expect a demise of this game within a year. If you notice, most people out here aren't using the word "fun" with the game. But the word "grind" is pervasive.
The way some people around here talk, you'd think David Braben personally sentenced them to roll a boulder uphill for all eternity.
is that in the Planetary landings expansion?
It bloody well better be!
Fact is, if the game doesn't show significant improvement in 1.1, I think we can expect a demise of this game within a year. If you notice, most people out here aren't using the word "fun" with the game. But the word "grind" is pervasive.
I do belive that if 1.1 isn't good we will see a lot of people leaving,
Stop beating up FD for not responding to player input
Seems FD is doing a good job beating itself up.
The point of beta-testing is bringing the game to an acceptable level. The devs decide what is or when it's acceptable. It
also means that not every bug is gonna be fixed within a limited timescale.
Be prepaired cause every update will introduce new bugs. No bugs means no new content.
I'd rather have an update with 2 new features, 5 bugfixes and 3 new bugs then no update at all.
your talking extremes, what would be bad about delaying an update for a week or two so that the game-breaking bugs (like losing a multi-milion ship to a paint scratch through shields) can be fixed for live-server deployment?