I dont know to be honest.And I would say, no material would be that close to the star surely? I'd expect there to be dozens of solar diameters before the material would settle... Not in far less than one... It would just get "blown away" or vapourised surely that close!?
Is it not just an astroid ring?
Is it not just an astroid ring?
And I would say, no material would be that close to the star surely? I'd expect there to be dozens of solar diameters before the material would settle... Not in far less than one... It would just get "blown away" or vapourised surely that close!?
^^ I suppose actual star should be somewhere around the size of one pixel in Ziljan's photo.
Mostly because the timescale of stars and astronomy in general does not play well with us.Just don't see how anything would sit happily in orbit that close to the star.. Looks out of wack!
So not like this proportion then!?
No. A protoplanetary disk is initially made from dust and gas, not mountain sized rocks. It's still in the process of cooling down and accumulating. So it would be quite different from the debris found in rings of Saturn for instance.
Well you may be assuming that the disk formed via accumulation. But this disk is so small it could have formed via capture of another body. In which case, some would fall in, some would get ejected, and some may form a smaller residual planet. A stable ring system with a narrow inner ring though seems unlikely in a T Tauri star.
A more realistic sized protoplanetary disk would be many times the diameter of a neptunian orbit. The image in the OP above looks to less than 1AU.
for example the protoplanetary disk below is about 90,000 Ls across:
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/1411/HLtauri_alma_1800.jpg