Hello everyone. While in the process of making my recurring meta-suggestions list, I decided to take a look at some habitat sizing issues within the game. While you'll have to wait for the list's release to get all of them, I wanted to discuss the koalas in a separate thread before release. Frontier requires the minimum land requirement for one animal be 180m^2, while the Australian Zoo and Aquarium Association require a minimum of 20m^2 per animal, with an additional 10m^2 per adult animal. The average size for a habitat ranges from 30m^2 to 100m^2. Now, scaling being what it is in PZ, I'm recommending that the requirements be shrunk from 180m^2 for one animal to 100m^2. I will show you why below:
Here are two habitats side-by-side, with two koalas each. The one on the left is 180m^2, the one on the right is around 100m^2.
Here is eye level from a guests point of view with nothing in the habitat. Not a big deal right now.
Here is the overview of both habitats. I enabled foliage/coverage welfare and made sure that both habitats have close to 100% foliage coverage relative to their size.
Now, you tell me which habitat you think it's going to be easier to see a koala in, if you're a guest. For an animal like a koala, climbing space is far more important than ground space. Requiring such a large area for land is just a waste of space for most zoos. Now, this doesn't matter for a sandbox player, but it definitely does matter for anyone trying to play challenge or franchise mode.






Now, you tell me which habitat you think it's going to be easier to see a koala in, if you're a guest. For an animal like a koala, climbing space is far more important than ground space. Requiring such a large area for land is just a waste of space for most zoos. Now, this doesn't matter for a sandbox player, but it definitely does matter for anyone trying to play challenge or franchise mode.