The Missing Species in JWE2, by The Amber Mines.

I really like how he categorized so many of the species from the Jurassic Park the Jurassic world eras from the lore that are missing from the game, but I have to say I'm very impressed with this video I'm not really sure if any of these species will appear but I'm pretty sure that some of them might be included in a JP 30th Anniversary DLC celebrating the franchise as a whole. 44 Missing Species-Technically 45 (Concavenator).

Source: https://youtu.be/dCIDhK9Ozag



Although he is missing the concavenator because Frontier added the Draco Rex and the Draco Rex was seen in Fallen Kingdom as a stuffed animal prop as was Diplodocus babies in the Lockwood Manor so there's a good chance that they could add this Species as the most attractive theropod in a 30th anniversary DLC.

My Guess Roster for a Jurassic Park 30th anniversary DLC: Watch the Video.
Concavenator
Hadrosaurus
Microceratus
Mussaurus
 
Last edited:
I am pretty sure that the Edmontosaurus clone is Anatosaurus.
Anatosaurus, along with Anatotitan, are considered synonymous with Edmontosaurus... they aren't clones, they're the exact same thing. I'm speaking of the manner in which Hadrosaurus is reconstructed; there isn't any major difference between Hadrosaurus and a "normal" Saurolophine reconstruction, like Edmontosaurus... which makes sense since the head shape is usually the most obvious difference between hadrosaurs and we know nothing of what Hadrosaurus's head looked like. Worst case scenario, it'll end up like Nodosaurus; they'll use a better known genre for the reconstruction (in Nodosaurus's case Borealopelta) and slap a different name on it.
 
Anatosaurus, along with Anatotitan, are considered synonymous with Edmontosaurus... they aren't clones, they're the exact same thing. I'm speaking of the manner in which Hadrosaurus is reconstructed; there isn't any major difference between Hadrosaurus and a "normal" Saurolophine reconstruction, like Edmontosaurus... which makes sense since the head shape is usually the most obvious difference between hadrosaurs and we know nothing of what Hadrosaurus head looked like. Worst case scenario, it'll end up like Nodosaurus; they'll use a better known genre for the reconstruction (in Nodosaurus case Borealopelta) and slap a different name on it.
OK. But do you think Peloroplites is a Polacanthus clone?
 
Back
Top Bottom