Hardware & Technical The Technology what is it good for thread of curiosity

Another interesting read on the plans of the ultra-rich for the rest of us:

'How tech's richest plan to save themselves after the apocalypse':

https://www.theguardian.com/technol...try-wealth-futurism-transhumanism-singularity

After I arrived, I was ushered into what I thought was the green room. But instead of being wired with a microphone or taken to a stage, I just sat there at a plain round table as my audience was brought to me: five super-wealthy guys – yes, all men – from the upper echelon of the hedge fund world. After a bit of small talk, I realized they had no interest in the information I had prepared about the future of technology. They had come with questions of their own.

They started out innocuously enough. Ethereum or bitcoin? Is quantum computing a real thing? Slowly but surely, however, they edged into their real topics of concern.

Which region will be less affected by the coming climate crisis: New Zealand or Alaska? Is Google really building Ray Kurzweil a home for his brain, and will his consciousness live through the transition, or will it die and be reborn as a whole new one? Finally, the CEO of a brokerage house explained that he had nearly completed building his own underground bunker system and asked: “How do I maintain authority over my security force after the Event?”

The Event. That was their euphemism for the environmental collapse, social unrest, nuclear explosion, unstoppable virus, or Mr Robot hack that takes everything down.

This single question occupied us for the rest of the hour. They knew armed guards would be required to protect their compounds from the angry mobs. But how would they pay the guards once money was worthless? What would stop the guards from choosing their own leader? The billionaires considered using special combination locks on the food supply that only they knew. Or making guards wear disciplinary collars of some kind in return for their survival. Or maybe building robots to serve as guards and workers – if that technology could be developed in time.

That’s when it hit me: at least as far as these gentlemen were concerned, this was a talk about the future of technology. Taking their cue from Elon Musk colonizing Mars, Peter Thiel reversing the ageing process, or Sam Altman and Ray Kurzweil uploading their minds into supercomputers, they were preparing for a digital future that had a whole lot less to do with making the world a better place than it did with transcending the human condition altogether and insulating themselves from a very real and present danger of climate change, rising sea levels, mass migrations, global pandemics, nativist panic, and resource depletion. For them, the future of technology is really about just one thing: escape.

It seems to be a book extract, and a good read too :)
 
Another interesting read on the plans of the ultra-rich for the rest of us:

'How tech's richest plan to save themselves after the apocalypse':

https://www.theguardian.com/technol...try-wealth-futurism-transhumanism-singularity



It seems to be a book extract, and a good read too :)


We're the most geographically isolated spot on the planet.
Larry Ellison (Oracle) bought the island of Lanai.
Facebook's Zuckerberg bought a huge tract on Kauai.
Oprah owns large swaths on Maui.

What's funny is everyone who grew up here knows, intuitively, exactly what they describe in that article.
Your money means jack once the shtf you need to rely on each other.
 
We're the most geographically isolated spot on the planet.
Larry Ellison (Oracle) bought the island of Lanai.
Facebook's Zuckerberg bought a huge tract on Kauai.
Oprah owns large swaths on Maui.

What's funny is everyone who grew up here knows, intuitively, exactly what they describe in that article.
Your money means jack once the shtf you need to rely on each other.

Has anyone told them (the Ellisons/Zuckerbergs et all) about the Pacific Islanders not far distant cannibalism? ;)

Not 100% sure if Hawaiians did this, but it certainly has been in the region (and culture).

But really the kind of stuff in that article is the most obvious 'failed thinking' that you really do get a true perspective on the types of people we have allowed pure greed to elevate to be our modern era God-Kings. This culture of greed fails to create any 'Kings' of anything other than crazy wealth, and at such a cost.

It would be great if the supposedly smart people in this world (with their expensive schooling and vast family wealth (often)) actually did something useful no? Anyway it is an interesting topic, but one that can not be dealt with in any depth on this forum (sadly). So just treat the article as 'brain food' and start the relevant conversations is other places, as it is all about a topic that will affect all of us.
 
Has anyone told them (the Ellisons/Zuckerbergs et all) about the Pacific Islanders not far distant cannibalism? ;)

Not 100% sure if Hawaiians did this, but it certainly has been in the region (and culture).

But really the kind of stuff in that article is the most obvious 'failed thinking' that you really do get a true perspective on the types of people we have allowed pure greed to elevate to be our modern era God-Kings. This culture of greed fails to create any 'Kings' of anything other than crazy wealth, and at such a cost.

It would be great if the supposedly smart people in this world (with their expensive schooling and vast family wealth (often)) actually did something useful no? Anyway it is an interesting topic, but one that can not be dealt with in any depth on this forum (sadly). So just treat the article as 'brain food' and start the relevant conversations is other places, as it is all about a topic that will affect all of us.


It's a matter of some debate, but I tend to prefer thinking we did at least eat Cpt Cook.

If we hit the apocalypse, then we'll probably have to go back to the ahupua'a system.

img448.jpg

http://www.hawaiihistory.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=ig.page&CategoryID=299

I can still see the ancient fishponds from my yard.

Wonder how ole Zuck will like carrying his own share, pulling weeds in the taro, or pounding poi perhaps...
Somehow I don't see him hand-lining in large tunas from the edge of a canoe.
 
Not to mention the locals will soon grow tired on just how useless we first world modern humans really are. In PNG they call us 'long pig' ;)
 
2FA is kinda everywhere these days, and as one of a few dissenting voices over the last few years when it started to roll out, this is an interesting article on why it is a flawed option (as it is often presented to us online currently):

'Password breach teaches Reddit that, yes, phone-based 2FA is that bad':

https://arstechnica.com/information...-reddit-that-yes-phone-based-2fa-is-that-bad/

A newly disclosed breach that stole password data and private messages is teaching Reddit officials a lesson that security professionals have known for years: two-factor authentication (2FA) that uses SMS or phone calls is only slightly better than no 2FA at all.

2fa as it has been rolled out online is mostly about data gathering, rather than actual security, which is why i don't use it.
 
1. Don't own any type of cell/mobile phone.
2. Don't watch television.
3. Don't read fiction anymore.
4. Only social platform is Frontier Forums.
5. I still feel contaminated.
 
'Man sues over Google’s “Location History” fiasco, case could affect millions':

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy...-privacy-when-it-secretly-kept-location-data/

Google is facing new scrutiny in the wake of revelations that it stores users’ location data even when "Location History" is turned off.

Last Friday, Google quietly edited its description of the practice on its own website—while continuing said practice—to clarify that "some location data may be saved as part of your activity on other services, like Search and Maps."

As a result of the previously unknown practice, which was first exposed by the Associated Press last week, Google has now been sued by a man in San Diego. Simultaneously, activists in Washington, DC are urging the Federal Trade Commission to examine whether the company is in breach of its 2011 consent decree with the agency.

In the lawsuit, which was filed in federal court last Friday in San Francisco, attorneys representing a man named Napoleon Patacsil argued that Google is violating the California Invasion of Privacy Act and the state’s constitutional right to privacy.

The lawsuit seeks class-action status, and it would include both an "Android Class" and "iPhone Class" for the potential millions of people in the United States with such phones who turned off their Location History and nonetheless had it recorded by Google. It will likely take months or longer for the judge to determine whether there is a sufficient class.

They want ALL the data, there is no opt-out :(
 
'Use of 'killer robots' in wars would breach law, say campaigners':

https://www.theguardian.com/science...bots-in-wars-would-breach-law-say-campaigners

Twenty-six countries explicitly support a prohibition on fully autonomous weapons, with Austria, Belgium and China recently joining thousands of scientists and artificial intelligence experts and more than 20 Nobel peace prize laureates in declaring their support.

In a new report published jointly by Human Rights Watch and Harvard Law School’s International Human Rights Clinic, the organisations have stated that fully autonomous weapons would violate the Martens Clause – a well established provision of international humanitarian law.

It requires emerging technologies to be judged by the “principles of humanity” and the “dictates of public conscience” when they are not already covered by other treaty provisions.

“Permitting the development and use of killer robots would undermine established moral and legal standards,” said Bonnie Docherty, senior arms researcher at Human Rights Watch, which coordinates the Campaign to Stop Killer Robots. “Countries should work together to preemptively ban these weapons systems before they proliferate around the world.

“The groundswell of opposition among scientists, faith leaders, tech companies, nongovernmental groups, and ordinary citizens shows that the public understands that killer robots cross a moral threshold. Their concerns, shared by many governments, deserve an immediate response.”

More than 70 governments are meeting at the UN in Geneva on 27 August for the sixth time to discuss the challenges raised by fully autonomous weapons.

....

At least 381 partly autonomous weapon and military robotics systems have been deployed or are under development in 12 states, including France, Israel, Russia, the UK and the US.

It has been reported that Russia opposes the ban of fully autonomous weapon systems, joining various others – including the US – who could seek to block any future negotiations.


Automatic systems, such as mechanised sentries in the Korean demilitarised zone and Israel’s Iron Dome, have already been deployed but cannot act fully autonomously.

Whom are the good guys again?
 
Whom are the good guys again?

Never been any.

The rules of war aren't written for anyone's benefit other than the states that drafting them. They primarily exist to make legitimate war too expensive for anyone that disagrees with the status quo. Follow the laws of war and be utterly outclassed by a handful of powers that be, or ignore them and have those same powers condemn and unify against you.

'Moral warfare' is a oxymoron and people splitting hairs over how many degrees of separation a person is allowed to be from the tools used in murder is comical. The idea that robots will be any worse than humans when it comes to collateral damage because they can't cry over it is also absurd.
 
'Researchers show Alexa “skill squatting” could hijack voice commands':

https://arstechnica.com/information...-skill-squatting-could-hijack-voice-commands/

The success of Internet of Things devices such as Amazon's Echo and Google Home have created an opportunity for developers to build voice-activated applications that connect ever deeper—into customers' homes and personal lives. And—according to research by a team from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)—the potential to exploit some of the idiosyncrasies of voice-recognition machine-learning systems for malicious purposes has grown as well.

Called "skill squatting," the attack method (described in a paper presented at USENIX Security Symposium in Baltimore this month) is currently limited to the Amazon Alexa platform—but it reveals a weakness that other voice platforms will have to resolve as they widen support for third-party applications. Ars met with the UIUC team (which is comprised of Deepak Kumar, Riccardo Paccagnella, Paul Murley, Eric Hennenfent, Joshua Mason, Assistant Professor Adam Bates, and Professor Michael Bailey) at USENIX Security. We talked about their research and the potential for other threats posed by voice-based input to information systems.

I'm just amazed people seem to want stuff like this in their lives?
 
'Dozens of iOS apps surreptitiously share user location data with tracking firms':

https://arstechnica.com/information...share-user-location-data-with-tracking-firms/

During preparation for a workshop at DEF CON in August on locating privacy leaks in network traffic, we discovered a number of applications on both iOS and Android that were broadcasting precise location data back to the applications' developers—in some cases in unencrypted formats. Research released late Friday by Sudo Security's Guardian mobile firewall team provided some confirmation to our findings—and demonstrated that many apps are sharing location data with firms that market location data information without the users' knowledge.

Apple is clearly a world leader here, but MS wants so badly to be the next 'apple' this kind of thing is a concern all over.
 
'Central Londoners to be subjected to facial recognition test this week':

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy...ting-facial-recognition-in-public-for-2-days/

London’s Metropolitan Police Service will be testing facial recognition technology in a handful of locations across the central core of the British capital on both Monday and Tuesday for eight hours each day.

This trial marks the seventh such trial in London since 2016. In addition to the December 17-18 tests, authorities have said there will be three more tests that have yet to be scheduled.

According to the police, these trials, which "will be used overtly with a clear uniformed presence and information leaflets will be disseminated to the public," are set to take place specifically in the vicinity of Soho, Piccadilly Circus, and Leicester Square.

The Met noted in a statement that anyone who declines to be scanned "will not be viewed as suspicious by police officers."

Law enforcement in South Wales has also previously tested this technology, among other locales around the United Kingdom. Numerous tests in the United States have shown that this technology can be flawed, particularly when in use against non-white suspects.

Here in the US, the technology has already become quietly pervasive.

George Orwell would be spinning in his grave! And i'm so happy to be out the Big Smoke, but we seriously need to stop the encroachment of Big Brother into our societies while we can. Some things go way beyond 'Well what you got to hide?'.
 
'Central Londoners to be subjected to facial recognition test this week':

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy...ting-facial-recognition-in-public-for-2-days/



George Orwell would be spinning in his grave! And i'm so happy to be out the Big Smoke, but we seriously need to stop the encroachment of Big Brother into our societies while we can. Some things go way beyond 'Well what you got to hide?'.

It's time to invest in this company.

https://imgur.com/a/ZbQFKwQ
 
'How a wireless keyboard lets hackers take full control of connected computers':

https://arstechnica.com/information...ers-take-full-control-of-connected-computers/

There’s a critical vulnerability in a model of Fujitsu wireless keyboard that makes it easy for hackers to take full control of connected computers, security researchers warned on Friday. Anyone using the keyboard model should strongly consider replacing it immediately.

The Fujitsu Wireless Keyboard Set LX901 uses a proprietary 2.4 GHz radio communication protocol called WirelessUSB LP from Cypress Semiconductor. While the keyboard and mouse send input that’s protected with the time-tested Advanced Encryption Standard, the USB dongle that accepts the input accepts unencrypted packets as well, as long as they’re in the proper format.

Researchers with the Germany-based penetration-testing firm SySS developed a proof-of-concept attack that exploits the insecure design. Using a small hardware device, they are able to send commands to vulnerable Fujitsu keyboard receiver dongles that are within range. As the video below demonstrates, the researchers were able to send input of their choice that’s automatically funneled to the connected computer.

I've never liked wireless controllers, so all mine are cabled, but that was less to do with the 'hackability' of the items and more a concern for extra radio waves bouncing around the house, and needing batteries (and maintaining those).
 
Back
Top Bottom