You could have just said "Newtonian".
FD would probably argue that it already
is Newtonian, just with a speed limit.
Likewise, the majority of folks scared of speed keep telling me to just use 'FA off mode', LOL, like i'm gonna go park up in some quiet corner of space, switch off auto-stabilisation (all "FA off" really does), and wobble around for five minutes going "Wheee! Look mum no hands!" - as if
that could somehow make up for the space speed limit, LOL..
I want to be able to take off from London, fly ballistically straight up, to look out or switch to external views as the ground slips away and layers of cloud swallow me up, to burst rhough the other side into blazing sunshine and deep blue sky, accelerating harder as the atmosphere gets thinner, the sky darkening.. Then correcting course for the Moon, accelerating up to 50 km/s, aiming for the rough location it's going to be in when i get there. Then buzzing the surface at 10 km/s, gently braking into an easy parking orbit by decelerating until my heading vector starts to drop away at equal rate as the horizon.
Just saying the word "Newtonian" doesn't communicate that you have any grasp at all of what i'm on about, and what's so sorely missing from ED.
Similarly, before anyone says it, the dubiously-named "FA off" mode does not begin to speak to this deficit.
Supercruise and optional speed limits (user-adjustable 'blue zones' / handling envelopes) could make great complimnatary flight modes, but they're no substitute nor consolation for basic, unfettered, freedom of movement.
I say "freedom of movement", you think "Newtonian". As if the basic liberty of moving is just some kind of arcane physics formula. Is a prisoner in a cell lamenting the theoretical physics of his predicament? I just want to be able to move freely, if that's not too esoteric or antiquated a notion.. Like we could in the last two installments.