General / Off-Topic THERESA'S FULL BREXIT: May rips UK OUT of single market and takes control of immigration

THERESA'S FULL BREXIT: May rips UK OUT of single market and takes control of immigration

MASS immigration will stop under Theresa May's 12 point Brexit plan which outlines the Government's vision for Britain's new role in the world after severing ties with the European Union.

• Britain WILL leave the single market
• UK to take control of borders, but plans are afoot for a common travel area
• We will leave customs union and be an "outward looking, global trading nation"
• MPs will get a vote on the final Brexit deal
• Ultimate agreement must be in place by April 2019
• Pound soars in reaction to Theresa May's speech
• It's Britain's "national interest" the EU succeeds, Theresa May says
• May warns EU Britain won't accept a bad Brexit deal - it will just leave
• UK to leave the European Court of Justice

Theresa May has told the nation to expect much tighter controls on mass immigration, the rejection of the single market, the autonomy for Britain to make all its own laws and investment in infrastructure.

She said she wanted continued cooperation with the EU to tackle terrorism and international crime, she hopes to preserve the rights of British workers abroad and those of EU citizens currently in Britain and wants Britain to become a global hub for science and innovation.

The Prime Minister believes the Leave vote at the EU referendum is proof that the British public does not want to be in the single market and does not want to accept the EU's key principles such as freedom of movement.

She has vowed to seek "the greatest possible access to the single market" without pumping huge volumes of money into the EU's coffers, saying: "The days of Britain making vast contributions to the EU every year will end."

Mrs May's comments have instantly boosted the Pound, which started the day at near record lows.

It has now shot up by 2.6 per cent against the dollar and 1.6 per cent per cent against the Euro – Sterling rose as high as $1.2342, the biggest daily rise against the dollar since 2008.

"The one revelation that stood out though was the intention to put any deal before parliament, which in theory should tip the balance slightly further away from a hard Brexit even if May acknowledged that we will not be seeking access to the single market," Craig Erlam, senior market analyst at Oanda said in a note

The Prime Minister warned the European Union not to try and stick Britain with a bad deal, saying "no deal is better than a bad deal" and testing the EU's adherence to their own principles by saying such confrontational actions would not be "those of a friend".

She admitted that financial predictions in the run-up to Brexit were way off the mark and the reason Britain leaving the single market is now a possibility is because the country's finances are in a fantastic position after choosing to leave the EU.

Parliament will get to vote on the final Brexit deal and Mrs May wants an end to the entire Brexit process within the next two years.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/75...arket-12-point-plan-immigration-customs-union

:D [up] :)
 
The UK will again become a free and sovereign country which will break the chains of the technocracy of the EU. The EU must change if it does not want to die
 
Last edited:
It's what was expected.

Someone said something about 'theft of democracy' etc.
I think the man's name is Fallous or something like that.[big grin]
 

verminstar

Banned
Im fairly happy with both the tone and the content of what was released. Ive grown impatient with the delays in getting article 50 moving...I do understand the delays completely, but I dont blame May fer that...that I blame on several key points to remember.

First of all, she was not elected into this job...she is the very definition of being thrown into the deep end, thanks to dodgy dave. Was nice to know the old adage of 'Captain goes down with his ship' really is a concept few politicians would know anything about. They are there to serve the people, not the other way around and he lost because he forgot that. If he had believed in serving the wishes of the people who put him there, then he would have been giving this speech to us all today, and not May. Granted, Farage and that other balloon soon fled the scene too, but they had served their purpose. Politicians...liar fer hire ^

And then theres half the nation running round like headless chickens all screaming about the sky falling down. Considering this forum, Im not gonna expand on the issues and unnecessary delays they have created...do I really need to? It hasnt just been rivers of tears, its been a bloody tsunami...seriously?

As fer the tone...she had to sound strong, even though shes not...its the little things in her body language that give it away. Shes been handed a script and told to give the performance of her life, because thats what the people need to believe right now. Call me a cynic with a wardrobe of tin foil hats if ye want, but she never came up with this all on her lonesome. That or she trying to play a bluff because she has a card up her sleeve that nobody else knows about which again brings me back to being handed a script.

Anyway...bout time May and not a bad act...and now fer a whole legion of way harsher critics...
 

Yaffle

Volunteer Moderator
I hope it works, I really do.

Let us see what Mr Junker has to say today, if he agrees all is well. If he says 'yes, but...' then there's a problem.
 
Yeah that very article was making the rounds last night. It gave most people a jolly good and sorely needed laugh.

C2ZxFqqXUAA8AWr.jpg%20large.jpg
 
The UK will again become a free and sovereign country which will break the chains of the technocracy of the EU. The EU must change if it does not want to die
Meh, we'll see. While I disagree with what's happening with the EU in general, I still believe we would have been better working *with* them to get a better deal rather than making a complete break. I guess what frustrates me most is that the complex issues of leaving the union were consistently overlooked and boiled down to seemingly simple issues of immigration and NHS funding, neither of which are actually very simple at all. I'm all for tighter controls over immigration -- there are jobs that natives will be overlooked for due to the availability of a cheap, skilled workforce in Europe. But such controls have to go hand-in-hand with welfare reform to encourage the uptake of *unskilled* work, otherwise we're likely to see some jobs where there'll be an employment gap and we'll once again be in a position where we're looking outside our borders for employees (and this time it'll be more expensive to employ them, as there'll be more red tape to navigate).

Without doubt there's a potential for Brexit to be a good thing in the long term. But I can't see any scenario where it's all unicorns and rainbows straight away. It's going to get bad (and that means austerity, further swinging cuts to the NHS, etc.) before it gets better.

[The thing I find most laughable about the statement in the OP is that MPs will be given a vote on the "final" form of Brexit. What happens if they vote against it? If it's "final" then will that vote simply be ignored? Or will it be refactored until the commons are happy with it (in which case it's not "final" at all)? Or even dropped entirely?]
 

Minonian

Banned
Without doubt there's a potential for Brexit to be a good thing in the long term. But I can't see any scenario where it's all unicorns and rainbows straight away. It's going to get bad (and that means austerity, further swinging cuts to the NHS, etc.) before it gets better.

So you saying with maneuvering yourself a far more worst position your chances going to increase? This is bad in the short term and remains bad in the long run.
 
So you saying with maneuvering yourself a far more worst position your chances going to increase? This is bad in the short term and remains bad in the long run.
I'm saying that with enough time and political energy we *can* make favourable trade deals, incentivise businesses to invest, etc. but it won't be immediate. In the short-term we'll have to put up with *unfavourable* conditions, and we'll find that in the short- to medium-term this action won't be felt trivially by the majority of us "normal" working Brits.
 

Minonian

Banned
I'm saying that with enough time and political energy we *can* make favourable trade deals, incentivise businesses to invest, etc. but it won't be immediate. In the short-term we'll have to put up with *unfavourable* conditions, and we'll find that in the short- to medium-term this action won't be felt trivially by the majority of us "normal" working Brits.

What you don't get it? you cant. you can make a few deals with a lot of effort, but its still going to hurt like hell.
And you can't make it, because just as i said, EU cant let UK go to easy. separate deals, with the member states? What you forgot there is a thing called united market. Which means the EU parliament have the final saying about this.
 
What you don't get it? you cant. you can make a few deals with a lot of effort, but its still going to hurt like hell.
And you can't make it, because just as i said, EU cant let UK go to easy. separate deals, with the member states? What you forgot there is a thing called united market. Which means the EU parliament have the final saying about this.

The negotiators who will need to actually make the deals themselves with all of our trading partners are also missing, and the civil service is shrinking where it really needs to be growing to manage the exit.
 

verminstar

Banned

The new statesman...aw yeah they so not biased. Businessmen and women all going over things said before the referendum even took place...I can see how this would be ever so helpful and constructive. Its finger pointing at its finest, and pointing to speeches made when the situation was very different...this was before 17m voters made their feelings very clear that we wanted out of the EU. Attitudes and opinions change with fresh perspective and 17m voters most certainly qualifies as fresh perspective...trawling up the past is generally regarded as a bad idea, yet here is a political/financial rag piece about past speeches being applauded by those with no desire to get off the gravy train.

Bravo...standing ovation in fact ^
 
Back
Top Bottom