So during the last FDEV live stream at about 01:01:25 , Zac and Arf pretty much came right out and said we were doing it the hard way in regards to taking out the titans and that "Before heading straight to the other titans, maybe sort of consider cleaning out some of the systems around to make it a bit easier for yourself" (Zac) and "Remember, they're obviously getting resources from somewhere and, if their resources are cut off, the titan is going to be far easier to engage." (Arf)
Now I'm sure I'm not the only one that immediately thought of the spire sites especially since Prof. Palin, in the galnet article titled 'Palin Makes Thargoid Spire Breakthrough', said "My research suggests these surface sites have been established to harvest resources which sustain the Thargoid motherships in some way. It may be that their supplies of some vital enzymes or fuels are running low, after months of being deployed away from their home worlds.”
It is possible, of course, that the resources Arf spoke of just meant the number of controlled systems or, even, something else entirely or a combination of various things. Currently, the Damage Resistance (DR) of the titans in relation to number of controlled systems does correlate (Note that Taranis data is obviously historical):
If we go just by controlled systems then we can sort of guess that <10 = High, 11-50 (75)? = Extremely High, and >50-75-ish = Maximum. Again, just a guess...not enough data.
My gut still tells me that the spire sites hold a larger influence on the DR than just the number of controlled systems. Why else would FDEV bother to create them and make it so obvious that they are for resources and then point out in a live stream that reducing those resources will help the figth? Even if we think it is just based off of controlled systems, it wouldn't hurt to take out the systems with spire sites first just in case they have weight in the equation.
One major question I have, though, is does it really matter? Will it actually be more real life time efficient to focus on reducing a titan's resources first to reduce its damage resistance vs. a sheer brute force approach? If reducing the resources of a titan is reliant on changing multiple systems' statuses and, thus, the weekly server tick, it may just be faster to wail away at it en masse like we did with Taranis since reducing a titan to zero is not reliant on the weekly tick. Especially with titans controlling over 100 systems it will take a good long time to get them down to even 'Extremely High' DR. This seems terribly inneficient to me and increases my feeling that DR has more to do with the spire sites than just overall controlled systems. I guess we'll see as time progresses.
Anyway, those are just a few of my thoughts. What are yours?
Now I'm sure I'm not the only one that immediately thought of the spire sites especially since Prof. Palin, in the galnet article titled 'Palin Makes Thargoid Spire Breakthrough', said "My research suggests these surface sites have been established to harvest resources which sustain the Thargoid motherships in some way. It may be that their supplies of some vital enzymes or fuels are running low, after months of being deployed away from their home worlds.”
It is possible, of course, that the resources Arf spoke of just meant the number of controlled systems or, even, something else entirely or a combination of various things. Currently, the Damage Resistance (DR) of the titans in relation to number of controlled systems does correlate (Note that Taranis data is obviously historical):
Name | Damage Reduction | Controlled Systems |
Taranis | High | 7 |
Leigong | Extremely High | 14 |
Oya | Extremely High | 40 |
Thor | Maximum | 76 |
Indra | Maximum | 90 |
Hadad | Maximum | 106 |
Cocijo | Maximum | 118 |
Raijin | Maximum | 122 |
If we go just by controlled systems then we can sort of guess that <10 = High, 11-50 (75)? = Extremely High, and >50-75-ish = Maximum. Again, just a guess...not enough data.
My gut still tells me that the spire sites hold a larger influence on the DR than just the number of controlled systems. Why else would FDEV bother to create them and make it so obvious that they are for resources and then point out in a live stream that reducing those resources will help the figth? Even if we think it is just based off of controlled systems, it wouldn't hurt to take out the systems with spire sites first just in case they have weight in the equation.
One major question I have, though, is does it really matter? Will it actually be more real life time efficient to focus on reducing a titan's resources first to reduce its damage resistance vs. a sheer brute force approach? If reducing the resources of a titan is reliant on changing multiple systems' statuses and, thus, the weekly server tick, it may just be faster to wail away at it en masse like we did with Taranis since reducing a titan to zero is not reliant on the weekly tick. Especially with titans controlling over 100 systems it will take a good long time to get them down to even 'Extremely High' DR. This seems terribly inneficient to me and increases my feeling that DR has more to do with the spire sites than just overall controlled systems. I guess we'll see as time progresses.
Anyway, those are just a few of my thoughts. What are yours?