Elite / Frontier Two of the Milky Way's spiral arms may be 'demoted'

From New Scientist Space

I always thought the Milky Way was more evenly distributed but this shows quite a different story.

New Scientist said:
Kicking Pluto out of the planet club was nothing compared to this. An astronomer is calling for demoting two entire arms of our galaxy, after they failed to turn up in a sensitive new map of the Milky Way's stars.
Astronomers have long believed that our galaxy possesses four spiral arms, since radio observations show concentrations of gas that trace such a spiral structure.
But now, two of the Milky Way's arms have failed to turn up in a sensitive new survey that used the Spitzer Space Telescope to map the distribution of millions of stars. Spitzer is well-suited to mapping the galaxy's stars because its infrared vision can pierce through the dust that obscures stars at optical wavelengths of light.
Astronomer Robert Benjamin of the University of Wisconsin in Whitewater, US, says these two arms, called Sagittarius and Norma, may be mostly concentrations of gas, perhaps sprinkled with pockets of young stars.
By contrast, the other two arms, called Scutum-Centaurus and Perseus, appear rich not only in gas, but in stars both young and old. "These major arms . . . could be the things that would really stand out if you were looking at the Milky Way galaxy from Andromeda [a nearby galaxy]," Benjamin says.


Note: The grid is centered on Earth/Sol
dn14057-1_600.jpg
 
Last edited:
I'm not surprised about this hypothesis. It seem that more we know, less we know. And less we know more we want to know, unless we stop thinking...

There's a lot of universes, to much for our eyes to see. Maybe our mind can have a glimpse of infinity but for now, humanity have other frontiers to cross. Of course, our heart is so preoccupied by primal need no
time to look at the star.(...)
 
Last edited:
I always find it fascinating how we can say, with some sort of certainty, what our Milky Way looks like from the perspective of looking 'in' at it. Things like that always seem to baffle me - the same thing happened when I found out how Hubble (I think) calculated the size of the galaxy.

Part of me is intrigued that mathematics and physics and all the other stuff enables us to know these things, and part of me hopes they're completely wrong and the Milky Way looks nothing like the above and is a completely different size! :p
 
I always find it fascinating how we can say, with some sort of certainty, what our Milky Way looks like from the perspective of looking 'in' at it. Things like that always seem to baffle me - the same thing happened when I found out how Hubble (I think) calculated the size of the galaxy.

Part of me is intrigued that mathematics and physics and all the other stuff enables us to know these things, and part of me hopes they're completely wrong and the Milky Way looks nothing like the above and is a completely different size! :p

Yeah I can see that - all those years ago they believed that the Galaxy was flat!!!
 
Wow, a leaked E4 galactic map! :p

I hope the E4 galactic map looks something like this, it's beautiful !

At some stage in the future, we may send a probe high above the plane of the Milky Way to take a look at what it actually looks like - either that or they'll send a ship there since there are a number of clusters above and below the galactic plane to travel to ( and it would be cool for E4 to include them as well ).
 
At some stage in the future, we may send a probe high above the plane of the Milky Way to take a look at what it actually looks like - either that or they'll send a ship there since there are a number of clusters above and below the galactic plane to travel to ( and it would be cool for E4 to include them as well ).

I can't really envisage a probe doing that for many, many years. I think Voyager 1 is the furthest man-made object - it's been travelling since 1977 is currently only 106.5 AU from the Sun. Granted it didn't travel on a direct route out, but you can see what I'm referring to I hope! :D
 
Last edited:
I can't really envisage a probe doing that for many, many years. I think Voyager 1 is the furthest man-made object - it's been travelling since 1977 is currently only 106.5 AU from the Sun. Granted it didn't travel on a direct route out, but you can see what I'm referring to I hope! :D

Oh definitely - it will probably require either some advanced warp drive or space-folding technology to get further out enough to give us a nice view :).
 

Sir.Tj

The Moderator who shall not be Blamed....
Volunteer Moderator
Oh definitely - it will probably require either some advanced warp drive or space-folding technology to get further out enough to give us a nice view :).

Nah all you need is a big catapult. and some of Steves whisky!
 
Back
Top Bottom