I will leave this in the capable hands of UFOlogiests to analyse and give their take on this in the comming months.When it comes to UFOs, the U.S. has a ‘massive intelligence failure on our hands,’ says former defense official
A former defense official explains why, when it comes to UFOs, the U.S. has a ‘massive intelligence failure on our hands’www.cnbc.com
Well this is a whole new can of worms.
The problem with that hypothesis is that the reds don't already own the solar system with their advance tech. Look at the trumpeting the happens when any country gets something in space. If any of them had Mach 10+ inertia-less craft that could do the things on those videos you think any of them would shut up about it?
www.usatoday.com
You can say the same about the various hacker groups run by governments - they exist, they've messed with governments, shut down nuclear sites etc, but you don't see governments admitting to them as they are a strategic advantage. Or aliens
You can say the same about the various hacker groups run by governments - they exist, they've messed with governments, shut down nuclear sites etc, but you don't see governments admitting to them as they are a strategic advantage. Or aliens
Either way it's better to know about incidents rather than have pilots keep quiet because they don't want to be laughed at.
What on Earth are you talking about?All the recent activity at Mars has woken up the Lobstermen again.... always the Lobstermen
Those of us who get our news from more reliable sources* have known this for years, now the sheeple are catching up!
I mean - who wouldn't trust a guy callng himself MC 900 ft jesus )UFOs are probably real, but probably not flying saucers manned by aliens. I, and many other amateur astronomers, have seen things you people wouldn't believe (especially off the shoulder of Orion), but most of them had a perfectly straight forward explanation. Balloons, landing lights, more balloons, ISS, and the occasional balloon.
What on Earth are you talking about?
The other thing about this is : once you know something is possible it is often easier to reproduce it - so for example once you know that superconductors exist then you are able to find others.
I vaguely remember something about mixing imperial units with metric ones
Still, I'm a huge fan of NASA. We all mess up once in a while, and rocket science is rocket science.Yeah, OT, but: When you image the night sky, you take many separate exposures. Then you align and stack those using software. The software also includes different pixel rejection algorithms, that remove anything that is moving through the field. It's not really an issue. Light pollution is the real gamebreaker, but even that can often be worked around using narrow band filters on nebulae. For galaxies though, darkness is king. Btw. I have a C8 and used to have an 80 mm APO. Both excellent telescopes, though the C8 can be a little temperamental, until you get to know it. These days I mostly use an old navy binocular from WW2 for visual. I love that one.
No, not at all. The level of technology on display is so advanced they could claim the solar system now. There is no competition. We would all be learning ruski.
