Varjo Aero - Elite @ VR Ultra

With the delay in the new Threadripper CPU's not being available, I decided to invest in a Varjo Aero HMD. Got it working last week and spent three hours playing Elite Dangerous: Horizons over the weekend. It works natively on Steam VR and my 1.0 Base Stations (2.0 recommended by Varjo), but you do need to use Varjo Base software to configure and run it. Advertised wait time was eight weeks. I got it in under five.

For perspective, my daily driver up until last weekend was a HTC Vive PRO 2, but the difference between the Aero and the PRO 2 is night and day. It's actually too good (will explain that later.)

I actually had to format and reinstall Windows 10 to get it to be recognized on my system (It was long overdue with Windows having 100GB of bloat). Something kept the USB 3.0 from being recognized and the HMD was only seen to be USB 2.0. I can say that Varjo tech support is excellent as I worked with them for three weeks to try and solve the issues. After the format / reinstall the HMD installed and performed flawlessly. So well, that I have not re-installed the Vive software and the PRO 2 is currently unplugged.

The good: When paired with a MSI SUPRIM X 3090 and Threadripper you can select VR Ultra with confidence. Aspheric lenses give butter smooth performance at a constant 90fps, incredible colors and blacks make for the most immersive experience I've ever had in Elite. Witchspace reminds me of a scene from 2001: A Space Odyssey! The real show stoppers are the crisp images. No squinting to make out text on the screen, no screen door effect, no god rays and simply jaw dropping graphics. Auto eye tracking and IPD adjustment makes sure what you see is perfectly in focus. The images are rock stable and react to the smallest of head movements. It feels like looking around naturally, no lag or tearing.

The bad: No built in audio. For me, this isn't a massive issue as I have a wireless 7.1 headset that fits over the HMD bands nicely, but some will want it. There is a standard audio plug in the HMD you can use, however. There are no forward looking cameras like on the PRO2, which makes dealing with the real world a little difficult, but it's a small price to pay. When using the Varjo Base desktop, I have my two monitors in the HMD display. Simply amazing resolution and clarity, you can interact on them as if you were looking at two real 32" screens. The worse "bad" thing is the headset is so good, the textures in the ship and station interiors all look, well, fake. With the PRO 2, there is a slight fuzziness that helps make the cockpit more believable. The Aero is so incredibly clear (you can see "scratches" in the dash of my Imperial Clipper), but the overall texture of the dash looks like clip art. I presume the textures are 4K, but when seen at 2,880 x 2,720 (7.8 MP) per eye through the Aspheric lenses, they look low res.

The biggest negative is, of course, the cost. Since getting the HMD working though, that concern is gone. It is costly, but you get extremely high quality in return. Beat Saber, DCS World, Sniper Elite VR, and other my VR Games are all PHENOMINAL with the Aero. It's a quantum leap over the Index, HP Reverb and Vive series.

Between my PRO2 and Aero, the Aero comes out on top in all categories. The difference between them is the same as going from a monitor to my original Vive HMD. There is no better residential VR experience available to the best of my knowledge.

Disclaimer: I am in no way associated with Varjo beyond purchasing an Aero from them. I paid full price for the unit and am not receiving any compensation for this post. My opinion is my own.

20220706_142626r.jpg
 
I don't own an Aero, but have read everything I can, and everything I've read aligns with what you've said. Personally, I think not having built in headphones is a huge plus, as even the highly acclaimed Index or Reverb G2 headphones are a big step down from a decent standalone headphones. How's distortion toward the outer edges? I know it was improved in a firmware update, but most would say it's still not quite perfect, and that's the only real fault with the headset.

The VR dream is really monitor quality clarity, and the hardware to run it at max settings without the need to tweak graphics settings for hours. This is pretty damn close if you have the hardware for it. Having a headset so good that you bring out the flaws in textures sounds like something I'd be more than happy to experience! :)

Thanks for the review, enjoy your VR experience.
 
Personally, I think not having built in headphones is a huge plus
I removed the ear phones from the PRO 2 HMD. I have a Razer Nari Ultimate that gives a much better experience with full ear coverage (so I don't annoy my wife with repetitive explosions and gunfire.) Wireless and I've used it for ten hours straight without a blip. Dual chat / game volume sliders so you can focus on your chats with buddies or game sound. I run this without the Razer Synapse software which forces you to log in just to set up a device. It eats up a lot of resources and seems to do a lot of poking into things on my computer it shouldn't. When I formatted my machine, I left it off and it is working fine.

Razer Nari Wireless Headset
 
Well... Frankly, much of the texturing is insufficent to "saturate" even my Valve Index, which is only half the resolution (...as in pixels per degree) the Aero is -- and that's with x2 supersampling, and with a fair bit of distance to the object. Many of these things are simply not intended to be seen close-up. :7

...and it's mostly just the resolution, and not the shading; Any time a texel on a surface covers more than one screen pixel (...or even more than half a one, were one to go all Nyquist), it really invokes that "painted scale model" look, rather than something "real", and, full scale, and "solid". That said: If much of what is normal mapped were to turn parallax mapped instead, I'm sure that would do wonders for a lot of things - not least of all: near-field planet surface textures.
 
Odyssey as it does not support VR
Yes it does in space and SRV. It's just the on foot stuff that shows as faux-flatscreen in the headset.

You won't get as good FPS but I did wonder about your comment on the textures. Textures and graphics have all been updated in Odyssey so even in flatscreen the difference is noticeable. I wondered if your impression of reality was enhanced in Odyssey.
 
Maybe you should have reinstalled Windows before splashing out, clear non blurry text and images are quite easy to achieve, these should have been very easy with your VP2 in Horizons "without squinting".
The Aero is so incredibly clear (you can see "scratches" in the dash of my Imperial Clipper),
Sorry dont want to be the damp sqib but i can do that with my "ancient" Samsung Oddy Plus, your positives are what i would call normal expectations and in Horizons very easy to acheive especially compared to Odyssey.

It no doubt is a very good headset, for the money it should be but your big points wouldnt sell it to me for half the price, ahem, not that your trying to sell it ;)
 
Yes it does in space and SRV. It's just the on foot stuff that shows as faux-flatscreen in the headset.

You won't get as good FPS but I did wonder about your comment on the textures. Textures and graphics have all been updated in Odyssey so even in flatscreen the difference is noticeable. I wondered if your impression of reality was enhanced in Odyssey.

Yeah, I agree. The best VR experience is to play Odyssey, but to avoid the on-foot stuff entirely. There's a lot of improvements that Odyssey brings, that are applicble to textures, other graphics, plus a lot of interface and quality of life stuff. Might indeed improve the subpar textures OP was noticing.
 
Maybe you should have reinstalled Windows before splashing out, clear non blurry text and images are quite easy to achieve, these should have been very easy with your VP2 in Horizons "without squinting".

Sorry dont want to be the damp sqib but i can do that with my "ancient" Samsung Oddy Plus, your positives are what i would call normal expectations and in Horizons very easy to acheive especially compared to Odyssey.

It no doubt is a very good headset, for the money it should be but your big points wouldnt sell it to me for half the price, ahem, not that your trying to sell it ;)
Agree, I can see them easily on my G1. The TL videos show the Aero as better than my G1 'Kinda'. There's the standard rebuttal that TL vids don't do the Aero justice which is fair but they also don't do the G1 justice either so that point is moot AFAIC. That being said, if my G1 broke tomorrow, of course I would buy an Aero.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom