PvP [VIDEO] PvP Gunship Runs from Docking Computer FDL???

Well, I'm not sure which specific cases your talking about, but the fact that you have a problem with gci is coming through loud clear.
 

Arguendo

Volunteer Moderator
Well, I'm not sure which specific cases your talking about, but the fact that you have a problem with gci is coming through loud clear.
Actually, I don't have a problem with GCI. There are however some inconsistencies in what some in the PvP community say, depending on who they are talking with. GCI
is just one spot where this is found, and it's for sure not applicable to everyone in that Discord. There are plenty of nice peeps there with lots of knowledge to share.

Note: I can see why you think it's GCI I have a problem with, when looking at my reply above. That was just used as an example of where you can find what I am talking about, and wasn't meant to be a catch-all for that Discord, but I see that it looks like that was my intention.
 
Last edited:

Falter

Banned
Which is it?
I clearly understand what NS did and why that's silly. I want to know when it's ok to use reverski though. How do you differentiate between someone "using it as a crutch" and "using it as a legitimate tactic"?

I am not sure neither you nor Gribley understand the point. To make it clear; you (as in parts of the PvP community) are pretty much moving the goalposts around all depending on which day of the week it is [where is it]

Turning your ship around, and "running for the hills" - while classing that as a 'reverski' isn't reverski.

So, it's not that reverski is a bad thing, in and of itself.
It's when it is relied on, just like synth - and bragged about by pilots who are egomaniacs with no skill, that it truly becomes a moot point to discuss.

But, the main point of the matter is, Reverski In and OF ITSELF is not a problem in game, whatsoever.
However, the point some others have tried to make to you, is that an FDL relying on just reverski against a ship much more fragile and less maneuverable than it, is pure silliness.

Especially if that FDL player fully turns around and runs so far that he is basically in another instance with the way the Peer-to-Peer, works in Elite.

Even I don't understand what your problem with GCI is either, Arguendo. And most of us here can't really seem to explain it to you, in so far as you just need to experience it firsthand yourself.

It's always best to experience anything yourself, before you make disingenuous assertions.


You can call my text 'chest thumping' if that's how you perceive it. but, those were the facts of what did happen, and in no-way can be a 'chest thump.'
If you (yourself) doubt that, I would be more than welcome to 1v1 you and prove some of the points made here, if you so desired?
 
Last edited:

Arguendo

Volunteer Moderator
Turning your ship around, and "running for the hills" - while classing that as a 'reverski' isn't reverski.
And I never called what Nightshady did a Reverski. I was replying to another post which stated that Reverski was a stupid tactic, but then went on to say that Reverski was ok if you're doing FA OFF.

But, the main point of the matter is, Reverski In and OF ITSELF is not a problem in game, whatsoever.
Really? How many times have you seen someone get talked down to for being a Reverski pilot? I've seen plenty, and again, we're not talking about what Nightshady did in his video.

However, the point some others have tried to make to you, is that an FDL relying on just reverski against a ship much more fragile and less maneuverable than it, is pure silliness.
I never said otherwise. I wasn't referring to Nightshady's tactic at all, as explained a few posts back.

Even I don't understand what your problem with GCI is either, Arguendo.
See the Note in my answer to Jason Barron. GCI was used as an example, as it's probably the best known PvP Discord in the game and I know Jason frequents it as I've talked with him in it :)
GCI is not the issue. Period.

And most of us here can't really seem to explain it to you, in so far as you just need to experience it firsthand yourself.

It's always best to experience anything yourself, before you make disingenuous assertions.

You can call my text 'chest thumping' if that's how you perceive it. but, those were the facts of what did happen, and in no-way can be a 'chest thump.'
If you (yourself) doubt that, I would be more than welcome to 1v1 you and prove some of the points made here, if you so desired?
The chest-thumping comment was made because you wrote paragraphs (plural!) about your fight that had literally nothing to do with what I wrote in the post you replied to. And then you challenge me to a duel? I mean, c'mon. You're literally putting your head on the chopping block here ;)

Your challenge does however clearly show that you don't understand what my point is. Again, it has nothing, absolutely nothing to do with Nightshady's tactics in the video. Let me spell it out:
A: "Reverski is bad"
B: "Ok, I've heard that Reverski is bad. But I've also heard that other things are bad in PVP and it seems that this list is changing every day"
A: "Ok. Well, Reverski is bad. Some of the guys doing FA OFF does Reverski, then it's not bad. But when doing it FA ON, it's bad"
B: "But you just said that Reverski is bad. So it's not always bad? Or are you saying it depends on the person doing it, how good they are at PvP, and how well they're liked in the PvP Community? Because that's what it appears like"
A: "...."
And in comes you, referring to the fight with Nightshady.

See what my point is? I often see some parts of the PvP Community pick and choose things that are "bad" depending on what side of the fence they are on at the time and who they are talking about. And this is not me trying to pick on Gribley, it's just that he posted what I have seen so many times in PvP oriented Discords. Different rules depending on who you are. You have to be with the cool kids, as I called them earlier, to always know what the rules are, and whether they are applicable to you or not.
 
Actually, I am using it to show a pattern of hypocrisy. You've been around GCI and other discords long enough that I will be surprised if you haven't picked up on it. Perhaps you don't care so much about it? Or choose to ignore it?


Before my reply to Falter above, I didn't even mention Nighshady's tactic. I know, that's the topic of the thread, yadda yadda yadda. I specifically focused on what Gribley wrote, because that's where it appeared. Nightshady's tactic is stupid. Everyone can see it. It's not even worth spending time on imo, but feel free to continue down that rabbithole if you find it interesting. I personally don't.
I did find Gribley's comment about using Reverski in FA OFF was fine, while FA ON was not, to be interesting. Because Reverski is a term, for when someone pretty much just flies backwards. Flying in reverse for manoeuvering reasons is not Reverski. That's using all your thrusters for the best effect in the applicable situation. So, I asked a question, and got the same conflicting answer back again. Sometimes it's ok, sometimes it's not. And in all those replies, it all comes down to "who does it". Is it the cool kids or is it someone the cool kids don't like.

That's how I see it, and it's pretty prevalent in places we both wander.

looks like i mangled the explanation to that one.
reverski is never OK as a tactic. what i was trying to say is that most players at least have the modicum of skill required to pull the dirty trick off in FA-off and that nightshadey is so utterly awful at PvP that he cannot even manage that.
 

Arguendo

Volunteer Moderator
looks like i mangled the explanation to that one.
reverski is never OK as a tactic. what i was trying to say is that most players at least have the modicum of skill required to pull the dirty trick off in FA-off and that nightshadey is so utterly awful at PvP that he cannot even manage that.
Fair enough gribley.
I agree with you about the Reverski btw. I just don't call what Nightshady did Reverski. That's something entirely else to me, and does not involved running away, but always facing your opponent and keeping them at a distance by reversing away from them. Basically an "I have long range weapons. Neener neener!" tactic.
Apparantly others think it's an ok tactic to use and have no problems with it, and I am not talking about Nightshady ;)
 

Falter

Banned
Fair enough gribley.
I agree with you about the Reverski btw. I just don't call what Nightshady did Reverski. That's something entirely else to me, and does not involved running away, but always facing your opponent and keeping them at a distance by reversing away from them. Basically an "I have long range weapons. Neener neener!" tactic.
Apparantly others think it's an ok tactic to use and have no problems with it, and I am not talking about Nightshady ;)

There are limitations to reverse being a legit thing, at least in my opinion.

Some ships can not do any turning without that ability, those include the (What is Turning?) Cutter, and the (I'm not a combat ship at all,) Python.
Those 2 ships, are some examples, also the T7, Keelback and T9 for that matter.

But those are non PVP-viable ships.


And for an FDL to use reverski as a 'tactic' never makes sense - ever.
Nor does something like, say a FAS, b/c those ships are fast and in the hands of a capable pilot, even with long range weapons, a pilot can make use of them without needing to spend the entire fight in reverse.

So, what Shady did, was reverski, with the added fact that he also ran from the fight - during it as well.
But, then again, I am quoting a 12.5th member, so /shrug - go figure...

Some Deadly Combat Pilots...shakes head...gotta wonder where all that time in game is spent... ;)
 
Last edited:
The difference in pilot skill and competence was vast.

...

...bragged about by pilots who are egomaniacs with no skill...

Might want to do a little self reflection there before calling other people out as egomaniacs. The OP managed to get your collective knickers in a right twist with a single post, and no one here has actually realised that, as you're still all talking about it. From my point of view while the fight was a stale mate, he clearly won on the psychological front.
 

Arguendo

Volunteer Moderator
But, then again, I am quoting a 12.5th member, so /shrug - go figure...

Some Deadly Combat Pilots...shakes head...gotta wonder where all that time in game is spent... ;)
Hahaha! You're still trying eh? I see you still haven't had that chat with your "teacher" who you "talk to every day" btw. You really should have that chat. Seriously. You may be enlightened, but then again, I am not so sure you want to know what's real and not at this point. Oh well. Such is life ;)
 
Hmmm. I don't PvP so forgive my ignorance but that looks a bit pointless to me. How does he possibly win that fight? The second your shields go down you run away and reboot them. Given that you're in a faster ship there's not much he can do about that is there? What could he do differently there, other than fly a FDL himself, to combat the run-reboot-re-engage tactic?

This - 100% this. I see one person running in this video and it isn't a gunship, how could a gunship run from an FDL anyway?

And while being long overdue, finally my POV of this "fight" with Nightshady in my Federal Gunship:
Apologies that it took so long to get my 50:15 minute video edited down to an appropriate size.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4DAiTmaGCs

Fly Dangerously CMDRs.

Yeah, as I said I see one person running in this fight and it isn't a gunship - but nice try with the title I suppose.
 
The Funniest part about this fight, was that not only did Nightshady challenge me to the 1v1, but he also refused to abide by the initial terms I set, which were:

-
No Synthing Allowed, Whatsoever
1v1
To The Death, Preferably, Unless 1 Party calls GG in Direct due to being unable to continue.
-


Correct me if I'm wrong but did you not break your own rules of engagement. At 7:10 in your latest video posted do you not synth heat sinks???Then chaff at 15:25??? Kettle meet pot??
 
Back
Top Bottom