General / Off-Topic We are not from East Africa after all?

It seems that Homo Sapiens were kicking around the Morocco area 300,000 years ago - that is 100,000 years earlier than the previous finds in East Africa. We might be looking at a whole new theory of evolution of man, or at least radical refinement.

https://www.theguardian.com/science...er-found-shake-foundations-of-the-human-story

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-40194150


(Seems a nice break from UK election, terrorism and American politics. Mind you Trump will probably say it is fake news 'cos God created man 6013 years ago. )
 
It seems that Homo Sapiens were kicking around the Morocco area 300,000 years ago - that is 100,000 years earlier than the previous finds in East Africa. We might be looking at a whole new theory of evolution of man, or at least radical refinement.

https://www.theguardian.com/science...er-found-shake-foundations-of-the-human-story

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-40194150

()

Caught the story on TV.
The books will have to get tossed out, and rewritten. It's really a huge change to how we thought we came about.
 
It seems that Homo Sapiens were kicking around the Morocco area 300,000 years ago - that is 100,000 years earlier than the previous finds in East Africa. We might be looking at a whole new theory of evolution of man, or at least radical refinement.

https://www.theguardian.com/science...er-found-shake-foundations-of-the-human-story

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-40194150


(Seems a nice break from UK election, terrorism and American politics. Mind you Trump will probably say it is fake news 'cos God created man 6013 years ago. )

I will always be skeptical of any human remains being dated beyond 7777 years, the dating methods used in science has flaws.
however, scientists can theorize all they want, they did so with Climate Change

One has to ask the question, what is the agenda of these scientists theorizing that the remains are 300,000 years old!!??
 
Last edited:

Minonian

Banned
It seems that Homo Sapiens were kicking around the Morocco area 300,000 years ago - that is 100,000 years earlier than the previous finds in East Africa. We might be looking at a whole new theory of evolution of man, or at least radical refinement.

https://www.theguardian.com/science...er-found-shake-foundations-of-the-human-story

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-40194150


(Seems a nice break from UK election, terrorism and American politics. Mind you Trump will probably say it is fake news 'cos God created man 6013 years ago. )
Not necessarily. Our spread and the pattern how we moved around the continents can be very hectic, and fluctuating. one tribe and pre sapiens specie can reach an area only to withdraw or die out until a new tribe or human specie arrive.
 
Homo sapiens is more solid than I thought. The earth will have to endure our bad company for some time
 
Last edited:
Most sane people know that scientific studies like these can only be "theories" just like the "theory" of evolution....it's our best guess at what happened with the limited facts at our disposal. Problem is when people regard these as hard "facts" then science gets worryingly close to religion.
 
Most sane people know that scientific studies like these can only be "theories" just like the "theory" of evolution....it's our best guess at what happened with the limited facts at our disposal. Problem is when people regard these as hard "facts" then science gets worryingly close to religion.

You are right. The satanists hiding god under the guise of science have created the new cult. Darwin, Copernicus, Einstein and Newton being their most revered Adepts.
 
You are right. The satanists hiding god under the guise of science have created the new cult. Darwin, Copernicus, Einstein and Newton being their most revered Adepts.

I'm no god worshipper, but with new evidence and knowledge previous theories are adjusted all the time, they're just that, theories, and even the most intelligent get things wrong. But at least they are theories based on facts (unlike religion).
 
Last edited:
I bet they lived in peace, never attacked a neighbour nor coveted his goat. They shared everything they had but obviously the top dude (or dudette they were all for equality) got a little bit more than everyone else because, well he was the big peace lover and obviously he didn't have to share his stuff because, well he was the big peace lover and he knew better than everyone else so it was only right. Then of course there came along top peace lovers family so he made sure they got a little bit more and got to keep it as was only fair, then he started making friends, all enlightened like himself, so they got a little bit more and got to keep. Boom before you know it we had the start of socialism and the rest is history.
 
I will always be skeptical of any human remains being dated beyond 7777 years, the dating methods used in science has flaws.
however, scientists can theorize all they want, they did so with Climate Change

One has to ask the question, what is the agenda of these scientists theorizing that the remains are 300,000 years old!!??


DONALD IS THAT YOU???? Wow I had no idea you had time to read these forums big up for ED. You using it to plan an invasion of the galaxy? :D
 
This thread went from interesting to depressing at record speed.
Of course it did. Calling out the fake sciences is never fun when you learn it's all just science fiction. What else is a theory? This ridiculous number times that, squared by so, so and it must be true.

Maybe if you find it depressing you could contribute instead of spreading negativity.
 
here are some questions for the evolutionist's out there
Consider the bird

did it breathe before its lungs evolved?
how did it know what to evolve, if its brain hadnt evolved yet?
how did it eat before the mouth evolved?
how did it find the food to eat before its eyes evolved?
where did the mouth send its food if the stomach hadnt evolved?
how did the bird have energy if it didnt eat because of the lack of a mouth?

Evolution is a fairy tale for grown ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. IT IS USELESS!!
-Professor Louis Bounoure
 
None of this makes sense.

People are credited with discovering places like America, Australia etc.. and when they landed there was already an indigenous population be it large or small - how did they get there from Morocco ?
 

Minonian

Banned
Most sane people know that scientific studies like these can only be "theories" just like the "theory" of evolution....it's our best guess at what happened with the limited facts at our disposal. Problem is when people regard these as hard "facts" then science gets worryingly close to religion.

And most denialist likes to call the most solidly proven theories like evolution an unproven speculation like you do right now.

It's just an attempt to keep denying and pretending there is nothing at all.
 
And most denialist likes to call the most solidly proven theories like evolution an unproven speculation like you do right now.

It's just an attempt to keep denying and pretending there is nothing at all.

Lol - "solidly proven theories" or " given the current level of evidence, our best guess is" - same thing
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom