”But some of us here don't see franchise as running a business.”
Even though, by definition...

Even though, by definition...
It's not a surprise to get the same fatalism here than we can get in real life "there's a way to do it, and others do it, so it's useless to do otherwise, let's all do it". That's how we got the planet in this state in the first place. That's why people created regulations, and that's why we ask for them because only Frontier can set them![]()
do you own battery driven electronics? do you use the internet? do you watch tv? then you are just as bad on destroying the planet.It's not a surprise to get the same fatalism here than we can get in real life "there's a way to do it, and others do it, so it's useless to do otherwise, let's all do it". That's how we got the planet in this state in the first place. That's why people created regulations, and that's why we ask for them because only Frontier can set them![]()
This is getting off topic but it makes me grumpy so I'll post. Accusations of hypocrisy are not a sensible rejoinder to comments that we all need to do better at protecting the world. In our current system it is not possible to live a life with no impact on the environment one way or another. Humanity requires huge changes to our food and energy systems which can only happen on a government and corporate level - individuals can and should do what they can to live within planetary boundaries BUT change won't happen if we expect anyone advocating for it to be a saint. Sorry for the rant but I work with environmental scientists so they get this all the time and it's so unfair.do you own battery driven electronics? do you use the internet? do you watch tv? then you are just as bad on destroying the planet.
thats so much rubbish. you just want the govt to babysit you. change starts at ourselfs. if you stop using ty stuff then others might too. and if many do it then there will be change. saying the govt needs to change it is pure hypocrisy. as long as the govt doesnt need to do something you dont either, right?This is getting off topic but it makes me grumpy so I'll post. Accusations of hypocrisy are not a sensible rejoinder to comments that we all need to do better at protecting the world. In our current system it is not possible to live a life with no impact on the environment one way or another. Humanity requires huge changes to our food and energy systems which can only happen on a government and corporate level - individuals can and should do what they can to live within planetary boundaries BUT change won't happen if we expect anyone advocating for it to be a saint. Sorry for the rant but I work with environmental scientists so they get this all the time and it's so unfair.
You misunderstood my point. There is a limit to what any one individual can do. I buy my electricity and gas from a company that gets more from renewables according to independent assessments but my house heating is not solar power because I can't afford to buy them (especially as government subsidies have been cut). I am not completely veggie because I find it difficult to resist the odd bit of meat or fish but I cook mostly veggie food at home but most products I buy it's completely impossible to evaluate their supply chain and work out which has a smaller carbon footprint. Even if I knew which one was lower that may be worse for biodiversity, or water security, or slavery. As a consumer I don't have the full picture and I never will. I do what I can for my budget with what information I have but that is all I can do and it won't save the world. I don't drive but I don't expect everyone to be able to live their lives without a car or to be able to afford an electric one. So I need my government to regulate, I need companies to work towards sustainability and I need whole systems to change. I resent the implication that I can't ask for that change until I've given up my job, stopped heating my house, stopped talking to people who drive cars, stopped buying clothes and stopped eating food. Exactly where is your line for how 'good' I need to be before I can ask my government not to subsidise fossil fuels and invest in wind farms? Or regulate farming?thats so much rubbish. you just want the govt to babysit you. change starts at ourselfs. if you stop using poopooty stuff then others might too. and if many do it then there will be change. saying the govt needs to change it is pure hypocrisy. as long as the govt doesnt need to do something you dont either, right?
This and so much this.
Oh, and by the way: While running a zoo IS busines, and we simulate that in Planet Zoo with $, trading animals between zoos is not. It's not "who pays most for that Gorilla", but "who will benefit the most". There are strong regulations. So argumenting with realism and real life market when talking about CC and Conservation also has its flaws.
On a side note: Personallly I don't think "that's how its done and there will always people who do it that way" won't lead us anywhere on no topic. There always need to be people who are willing to change the system and sometimes even do a sacrefise for it. In this case, earning less CC.
And just because there are poo-production faces in RL when it comes to charity, it doesn't mean we should use them as an example.
There are markets "in real life" that work EXACTLY like the animal market in Planet Zoo. It's even getting more and more common in online marketing, where people buy your stuff and sell it for a higher price making even millions doing it. It's nothing new, is it right or wrong,
thats so much rubbish. you just want the govt to babysit you. change starts at ourselfs. if you stop using poopooty stuff then others might too. and if many do it then there will be change. saying the govt needs to change it is pure hypocrisy. as long as the govt doesnt need to do something you dont either, right?
That wasn't my point. My point was, that the game was marketed towards realism and conservation. Selling and reselling, a capitalistic market, is not present in modern zoos. The "making money" aspect is ONLY on zoo representation, merchandising and whatever. You do not earn your money by selling polar bears, because there are indeed strong restrictions.If trading in zoos wasn't regulated, we would have a huge problem with poaching.
Also, don't tell me what game is or is not for me. I know for myself, thank you.