We need pictures, I don't understand what we are talking about![]()
Y......
No pictures have been posted, and now we're talking about science.
I expected nothing less.
I was really worried that my serious question might have produced all sorts of salacious nonsense so big thanks to everyone for "keeping it clean".
So apart from "ratings / increasing audience" (i.e. encouraging the prurient voyeurism of males) I see no argument for the skimpiness. I can understand high-jumpers and pole-vaulters not wanting loose clothing to catch-the-bar (if that would cause an issue) but the idea that a woman should "show her knickers" to be accepted / get sponsorship is daft.
Don't get me wrong, I am a normal male but for example I don't go to watch netball even though it is my favourite spectator sport after handball because I don't want to be thought-of as a "perv" watching women racing around in very short skirts.
I was really worried that my serious question might have produced all sorts of salacious nonsense so big thanks to everyone for "keeping it clean".
So apart from "ratings / increasing audience" (i.e. encouraging the prurient voyeurism of males) I see no argument for the skimpiness. I can understand high-jumpers and pole-vaulters not wanting loose clothing to catch-the-bar (if that would cause an issue) but the idea that a woman should "show her knickers" to be accepted / get sponsorship is daft.
Don't get me wrong, I am a normal male but for example I don't go to watch netball even though it is my favourite spectator sport after handball because I don't want to be thought-of as a "perv" watching women racing around in very short skirts.
I was really worried that my serious question might have produced all sorts of salacious nonsense so big thanks to everyone for "keeping it clean".
So apart from "ratings / increasing audience" (i.e. encouraging the prurient voyeurism of males) I see no argument for the skimpiness. I can understand high-jumpers and pole-vaulters not wanting loose clothing to catch-the-bar (if that would cause an issue) but the idea that a woman should "show her knickers" to be accepted / get sponsorship is daft.
Don't get me wrong, I am a normal male but for example I don't go to watch netball even though it is my favourite spectator sport after handball because I don't want to be thought-of as a "perv" watching women racing around in very short skirts.
What is it with women's legs that attract men? Per an advertisement getting us to buy a product tall and skinny seems to be the most attractive per a car or a shaving razor. Are we hoping to get a glance above those legs? We all know what is there and it pretty much looks the same for every woman except for teenagers wondering to see it for the first time. Has advertising taken over our male conception of the perfect woman who is tall, thin and great ? History for the last 3000 years says a full figured woman could have a better chance of bringing a child into the world long before hospitals and drugs came into being. Maybe we should look for love and not care so much pet what an advertising company wants to sell us. It is more about looking into each others eyes versus a great looking body at a nightclub for a lifetime taking care of each other. Just one opinion. So much for athletes in panties.
That would save a lot of money on sports clothing and shoes.
Does this thread need pictures?