Dinosaurs Why JWE Shouldn't add E750

In season 3 of Jurassic World, Camp Cretaceous, we finally get to see the E750 project that was the main buildup of season 2. After seeing for the first time, I was not a fan.
1622679531845.png
It reminded me too much of that concept for Jurassic Park 4 where they used human DNA in dinosaurs. It doesn't exactly feel like a dinosaur and while I've heard people say that the Indoraptor is the same thing, It's not. The Indoraptor still looks like a dinosaur and has a very good design. E750, doesn't. We also see that it can jump over the camp fence and looks artificial and not in a good way. I just don't think it would fit in with JWE. However, I don't deny the fact that it could be a really good addition to the game that could have unique animation so that for example, when It's fighting another dinosaur, it could do an animation similar to the Stegosaurus where it swings It's tail at the combatant and like the Troodon, poison it. I think it could only work in the game if Frontier (usually they do) do it right.
 
In season 3 of Jurassic World, Camp Cretaceous, we finally get to see the E750 project that was the main buildup of season 2. After seeing for the first time, I was not a fan. View attachment 235442 It reminded me too much of that concept for Jurassic Park 4 where they used human DNA in dinosaurs. It doesn't exactly feel like a dinosaur and while I've heard people say that the Indoraptor is the same thing, It's not. The Indoraptor still looks like a dinosaur and has a very good design. E750, doesn't. We also see that it can jump over the camp fence and looks artificial and not in a good way. I just don't think it would fit in with JWE. However, I don't deny the fact that it could be a really good addition to the game that could have unique animation so that for example, when It's fighting another dinosaur, it could do an animation similar to the Stegosaurus where it swings It's tail at the combatant and like the Troodon, poison it. I think it could only work in the game if Frontier (usually they do) do it right.

Similarly, I am not too big a fan of E750, though I do like some of the concepts behind its behavior and its unnervingly long legs.

It's mostly the shape of the head and execution of a concept like parthenogenesis that is my issue. Dragging prey up into trees and its roar is pretty neat, I just hope that if Frontier does one day add this thing to a Jurassic game they stay way from what didn't work. Also, can we stop calling everything " [Insert name] Rex " its utterly run its course. I think its the homogeneity of the hybrids that makes them so boring, just too much tyrannosaur and raptor, it's been done to death.
 

Deleted member 275623

D
Yea they are there to please the young ones i guess?! They are monsters anyways in this movies. So why put in 100% monster. The plot is also so stupid in the 2 new movies. Its like written for ten year olds. If you want monstee action watch godzilla king of the monsters. 😂
 

Deleted member 275623

D
In dominion there will be no hybrid. At least they said so. So camp cretacous aka scorpio rex was the last one. Unless that thing on the boat is another one ending inseason 3💩
 
Ah yes, the "I don't like hybrids so please don't add them" routine... gotta love how you people casually ignore all the fake dinosaurs with fake elements that they added even before the Indominus was even a thing...

Yea they are there to please the young ones i guess?! They are monsters anyways in this movies. So why put in 100% monster. The plot is also so stupid in the 2 new movies. Its like written for ten year olds. If you want monstee action watch godzilla king of the monsters. 😂
Because watching unrealistic mutant freaks casually labeled "dinosaurs" chasing aimless people across an island three times in a row is so clever and well written and adult? Whether you people want to admit it or not, hybrid monster action has been a thing since the first movie... and geneticists with the power to mix anything and everything using that power to create monsters that don't get a real dinosaur name slapped onto them was an inevitability, not to mention plays right into Ian Malcolm's chaos mumbo jumbo and provides much better lore building and world building than "we must go to dinosaur island/we're stuck on dinosaur island/we escaped dinosaur island" again...
 
Last edited:
The inaccurate way in which real dinosaur species are shown does not justify the creation of absurd hybrids. One thing has nothing to do with the other. The DNA of modern species is just the fictional way to recreate dinosaurs. It's the lore. These JW hybrids are unnecessary
 

Deleted member 275623

D
Exactly we all know they are hybrids anyway, also yes the story was never deep or anything but come on fallen kingdom is so stupid its insane. I like the movie but the plot is just dumb.
 
The inaccurate way in which real dinosaur species are shown does not justify the creation of absurd hybrids. One thing has nothing to do with the other. The DNA of modern species is just the fictional way to recreate dinosaurs. It's the lore. These JW hybrids are unnecessary
I think you'll find that the “one thing has everything to do with other”. Making the “dinosaurs” in this franchise means (mostly) recreating the dinosaur’s genome from amber samples and fossils with various modern animal species DNA added to the sample, in order to make it live in the modern world and/or give it desirable features to make it a more spectacular attraction.

Hybrids are made using a similar sort of process, starting off with a genome that can be used as a base to which more species' DNA (whether they be modern or prehistoric, practical or spectacular) are added to the mix and overall replace what was originally in the base genome and thus create entirely new species. I dare say, I believe hybrid dinosaurs to be more plausible additions to this franchise than marine reptiles or even pterosaurs.

Also, I love how your against the supposedly “absurd hybrids”, but perfectly fine with the multiple Dinosaurs in name only that make up this franchise, e.g. The itsy bitsy, teenie weenie, frill splaying, venom spraying Dilophosaurus.
 

Jens Erik

Senior Community Manager
Frontier
It doesn't exactly feel like a dinosaur and while I've heard people say that the Indoraptor is the same thing, It's not. The Indoraptor still looks like a dinosaur and has a very good design. E750, doesn't. We also see that it can jump over the camp fence and looks artificial and not in a good way. I just don't think it would fit in with JWE
Hey Planet_JWE25!

We get a lot of questions about Camp Cretaceous and the E750, and if we're making either of them a part of Jurassic World Evolution. We don't have anything to announce regarding either of these in the game.
 
I think you'll find that the “one thing has everything to do with other”. Making the “dinosaurs” in this franchise means (mostly) recreating the dinosaur’s genome from amber samples and fossils with various modern animal species DNA added to the sample, in order to make it live in the modern world and/or give it desirable features to make it a more spectacular attraction.

Hybrids are made using a similar sort of process, starting off with a genome that can be used as a base to which more species' DNA (whether they be modern or prehistoric, practical or spectacular) are added to the mix and overall replace what was originally in the base genome and thus create entirely new species. I dare say, I believe hybrid dinosaurs to be more plausible additions to this franchise than marine reptiles or even pterosaurs.

Also, I love how your against the supposedly “absurd hybrids”, but perfectly fine with the multiple Dinosaurs in name only that make up this franchise, e.g. The itsy bitsy, teenie weenie, frill splaying, venom spraying Dilophosaurus.
I would prefer dinosaurs to be accurate, what I meant is that REAL SPECIES should be priority, now the way they are represented is something else. Since in the movie they are inaccurate...due to the genetic lore of the franchise, that's okay. For example, in JW1 the villain, rather than the Indominus rex, could have been a Giganotosaurus, even inaccurate, but would be REPRESENTING an animal that actually existed, still with all the anatomical errors. I really don't see anything good in INVENTED BIZARRE SPECIES.

Even if Universal represents the true DINOSAUR SPECIES inaccurately, they will still be showing an animal. The proof of this is that in TLWJP. Most of the film features T.rex's parental behavior, obviously despite all the anatomical inaccuracy, the film wanted to pass on the idea that dinosaurs are animals with common natural behaviours. Already in JW, with (Indominus rex, Indoraptor, Scorpius rex) aberrations that did not even exist, they changed the focus a lot. Just compulsive killer and louder monsters. Indoraptor was exaggerated. Scorpius rex...no comment

Totally different from the idea of showing dinosaurs as animals. What is seen in JP2. In my humble opinion, the only acceptable hybrid would be the Indominus rex, as anatomically it is quite SIMILAR to a real theropod. Anyway, I like the JW movies. They're still cool movies.

And YES! I will always prefer the species of dinosaurs that actually existed, even though they are quite inaccurate in their representation in the films

Anyway, it's my opinion, I respect yours too
 
Last edited:
Ah yes, the "I don't like hybrids so please don't add them" routine... gotta love how you people casually ignore all the fake dinosaurs with fake elements that they added even before the Indominus was even a thing...


Because watching unrealistic mutant freaks casually labeled "dinosaurs" chasing aimless people across an island three times in a row is so clever and well written and adult? Whether you people want to admit it or not, hybrid monster action has been a thing since the first movie... and geneticists with the power to mix anything and everything using that power to create monsters that don't get a real dinosaur name slapped onto them was an inevitability, not to mention plays right into Ian Malcolm's chaos mumbo jumbo and provides much better lore building and world building than "we must go to dinosaur island/we're stuck on dinosaur island/we escaped dinosaur island" again...
It's mostly just E750. I personally really like the Indominus and Indoraptor as well as the hybrids Frontier added like the Spinoraptor and Stegoceratops.
 
I would prefer dinosaurs to be accurate, what I meant is that REAL SPECIES should be priority, now the way they are represented is something else. Since in the movie they are inaccurate...due to the genetic lore of the franchise, that's okay. For example, in JW1 the villain, rather than the Indominus rex, could have been a Giganotosaurus, even inaccurate, but would be REPRESENTING an animal that actually existed, still with all the anatomical errors. I really don't see anything good in INVENTED BIZARRE SPECIES.
You know, I was going to ask you this... and now that I have the answer, it's as stupid sounding as I thought it would be. Seriously, it's okay if they make up dinosaurs if they slap on a real name, but if its a fake name its bad? Are you saying if the Indoraptor was an Irritator you'd be okay with it? I'm curious, when does a fake dinosaur with a real name become a FAKE DINOSAUR with a real name?

Oh, and thanks to that "representing" you're so fine with, just about every toy and videogame now depicts Dilophosaurus with venom and a neck frill... let's just be happy the kangaroo-hoping thing didn't last...

Even if Universal represents the true DINOSAUR SPECIES inaccurately, they will still be showing an animal. The proof of this is that in TLWJP. Most of the film features T.rex's parental behavior, obviously despite all the anatomical inaccuracy, the film wanted to pass on the idea that dinosaurs are animals with common natural behaviours. Already in JW, with (Indominus rex, Indoraptor, Scorpius rex) aberrations that did not even exist, they changed the focus a lot. Just compulsive killer and louder monsters. Indoraptor was exaggerated. Scorpius rex...no comment
First of all, they've been depicting dinosaurs as obsessive killing machine's since the very first movie... the raptors, the T-Rex, the Spinosaurus, the Pteranodon; all of them obsessively stalking and killing people... and let's not forget the novel, where the dinosaurs were portrayed as psychotic killers, ruthlessly killing their own kind for no particular reason, because "surprise, dinosaurs aren't modern animals, they're really different" to play into Malcolm's "it's all unpredictable chaos" stuff.

Second, you just said the Indominus would have been okay if it was a Giganotosaurus... but the Indominus was a psycho killer monster... are you trying to say it would be okay to depict the Giganotosaurus as a psycho killer monster?

It's mostly just E750. I personally really like the Indominus and Indoraptor as well as the hybrids Frontier added like the Spinoraptor and Stegoceratops.
Well, the Scorpius was described as too hideous to display and a failure, ordered by Masarani to be destroyed, so... yeah, that makes sense... but a lot of people still love it and want it in the game.
 
Last edited:
Well, the Scorpius was described as a too hideous to display and a failure, so... yeah, that makes sense... but a lot of people still love it and want it in the game.
Yes it was mentioned in the blog about Masrani not wanting to exhibit it. I'm not saying it would be a bad addition, I just dislike the design and behavior of it. If Frontier does add it, they have to make it really well for it to appeal to me.
 
Yes it was mentioned in the blog about Masrani not wanting to exhibit it. I'm not saying it would be a bad addition, I just dislike the design and behavior of it. If Frontier does add it, they have to make it really well for it to appeal to me.
Everyone has things they don't like... I for one don't really care for the Metriacanthosaurus... a random, obscure genus known from only a handful of bones? ...over something more mainstream, like Yangchuanosaurus, the animal which Metriacanthosaurus restorations are often based on? ...sigh... but that's just the way things are...
 

Deleted member 275623

D
I mean on pc its already in by a mod😅 looks pretty good
 
You know, I was going to ask you this... and now that I have the answer, it's as stupid sounding as I thought it would be. Seriously, it's okay if they make up dinosaurs if they slap on a real name, but if its a fake name its bad? Are you saying if the Indoraptor was an Irritator you'd be okay with it? I'm curious, when does a fake dinosaur with a real name become a FAKE DINOSAUR with a real name?

Oh, and thanks to that "representing" you're so fine with, just about every toy and videogame now depicts Dilophosaurus with venom and a neck frill... let's just be happy the kangaroo-hoping thing didn't last...


First of all, they've been depicting dinosaurs as obsessive killing machine's since the very first movie... the raptors, the T-Rex, the Spinosaurus, the Pteranodon; all of them obsessively stalking and killing people... and let's not forget the novel, where the dinosaurs were portrayed as psychotic killers, ruthlessly killing their own kind for no particular reason, because "surprise, dinosaurs aren't modern animals, they're really different" to play into Malcolm's "it's all unpredictable chaos" stuff.

Second, you just said the Indominus would have been okay if it was a Giganotosaurus... but the Indominus was a psycho killer monster... are you trying to say it would be okay to depict the Giganotosaurus as a psycho killer monster?


Well, the Scorpius was described as too hideous to display and a failure, ordered by Masarani to be destroyed, so... yeah, that makes sense... but a lot of people still love it and want it in the game.
In any dinosaurs species psycho killer behaviour is a big mistake, agreed in this point

What I mean is that although JP and JW are scientifically inaccurate. This franchise plays an important role in science, which is to generate in the general public interest in paleontology. It doesn't matter if the real species are being represented anatomically and behaviorally accurate. It's just a matter of interpretation. I still hate these invented hybrid species. I don't care if the real dinosaur species are inaccurate in movies and books because the franchise is about entertainment and not science.

My criticism is against the invention of species that never existed, while there are many real dinosaur species to be well explored. In place of Indoraptor, Megaraptor and Australovenator would be much more interesting. Because like I said before, the franchise is not a scientific documentary, but... generate in people interest in paleontology

Indominus rex is even acceptable, but to me Indoraptor and Scorpius rex look like aliens so exaggerated that they are

But it doesn't matter, at some point, these hybrids will be added to the game because of their popularity. If they're not added, we don't know either. I just think it's unfair that waste of time with invented dinosaurs, when there were so many real dinosaur species that are cool to explore in the franchise. But if the other players like these things, I'll be okay with that
 
Last edited:
The problem with common people seeing things like Indoraptor and Scorpius rex in movies, series and games is that those who don't understand anything about dinosaurs will end up creating an erroneous vision of dinosaurs...they will think that it's normal for a dinosaur to kill for sport and howl like a wolf...

But when it was behavior, you said it right. Most of the dinosaurs in the franchise are psychopathic killers. A mistake that should be corrected, at least in the real species. What JW did was step it up. But what has been done with the franchise is already done, and I'm glad that at least in JWD, the focus will be on showing the real species of dinosaurs, even with anatomical inaccuracies... the important thing is that the general public will be able to meet other dinosaurs, and see the famous dinosaurs again generating more interest in paleontology
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom