WHY ON EARTH our faction's HAZARDOUS RES became only HIGH?
- Thread starter Maro-Val
- Start date
Lol things making sense in elite? That would be a first.
I guess we're so used to FD's 'dynamic galaxy' being almost entirely static, that we can't handle change anymore.
Dynamic like changing the extraction sites after two years?
If I've ever hunted pirates in this unnamed system, that would be why. I am the Haz in the Haz RES.
Here's a song to help you cope:
[video=youtube;YPA7nJscUpI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPA7nJscUpI[/video]
Here's a song to help you cope:
[video=youtube;YPA7nJscUpI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPA7nJscUpI[/video]
Deleted member 115407
D
Things change. Hunt in the High RES or go find another spot.
This means all of my fav mining spots have likely changed. You won't hear me squawking about it. I'll just go find new mining spots. It could also be a boon for BGSers, and some pristines may now have workable RES where there were none before.
If I had it my way RES across the galaxy would shift with the weekly update.
Ooh, time to make a suggestion thread.
This means all of my fav mining spots have likely changed. You won't hear me squawking about it. I'll just go find new mining spots. It could also be a boon for BGSers, and some pristines may now have workable RES where there were none before.
If I had it my way RES across the galaxy would shift with the weekly update.
Ooh, time to make a suggestion thread.
Last edited by a moderator:
why even change it at all, it adds nothing of interest.
now i can search and hope to find a new HAZRES without rocks.
more like: people were so used to it, they have chosen their factions home to some of the "static" events and now get rekt by the change.
If what is static and what is not static was clearer (esp. to "founders" of factions), it would be more fair.
But I think this is too much to ask.
Since it is not clear, FDev should just "flick the switch" and do what the controlling player faction requested. It is not that Andromeda will fall on Milky Way.
But I think this is too much to ask.
Since it is not clear, FDev should just "flick the switch" and do what the controlling player faction requested. It is not that Andromeda will fall on Milky Way.
I think it is a very easy to upgrade a hi res to a has res manually, for FD. Maybe just point & click.
The problem is that again again and again and again they failed to foresee what may upset their customers.
The problem is that again again and again and again they failed to foresee what may upset their customers.
No mention in patch notes. I didn't see any mention of HazRES changes during beta, but I realize I didn't see every post made for the beta.
Any heads up would be nice, whether this is a one-off move of the dynamic in-game static elements or they've removed the static aspect of them.
Time or credits lost to moving an entire fleet of more than 20 ships is time and credits not spent playing the game.
Change isn't always smooth sailing. [knocked out][mad]
EDIT: Anyone notice if any pristine systems in the bubble have changed to lesser reserves? Looks like a new plan for tonight's play time.
Last edited:
I'm afraid moving an entire fleet of more than 20 ships is considered playing the game.
On the other hand, why these changes were made in the first place and why they weren't announced...fair point.
Last edited:
I bet you reached forum Elite status with such interesting posts that contribute to the subject at hand.
Keep it up.
A system's security level can change due to state yet the RES don't change from Hazardous to High when they do.
Maybe now FD's tied it to Security, but no patch note about it.
Another addition for that thread of undocumented changes.
But if they changed it because of security in system. That way it doesnt add up.