These two kind of users were very fun to observe in the forums in the last day:
"HeY I FiND OdySsey GReAt WHaT is WronG wiTH U gUys? U CrY SOOO mUcH!1" -
Then it goes from top #1 seller on Steam to mostly negative reviews
"I HaVe NOO PeRForManCe IssUeS!1 YOu PC BaD AhahAh!!1one!" -
Then Frontier's Staff acknowledges the performance issues
50% refund? That'd be okay, but i prefer an ARX reward.
Most of all, i prefer an Odyssey that works and is actually a Horizon's upgrade, instead of this disastrous downgrade they pushed down to production to close their may's 31st annual finance results.
Heh, and your post reminds me of tritium mining nerf at the time of FC update.
In FC beta we could mine A LOT of Tritium using lasers.
In live release laser mining Tritium was totally broken, hotspots worked backwards, almost no Tritium % rocks etc.
FD acknowledged that there is SOME problem with Tritium mining, so a lot of commanders were sure that FD is going to rollback changes to beta mining yields.
I tried to warn people that it's just wishful thinking, because we have no idea what is the actual desired of Tritium hourly mining rate FD is considering correct.
I was called names, troll, and the main "reasoning" behind this was pasting a link : "look, FD says Tritium is broken, so it will be like it was in beta FOR SURE!!!111"
But this rollback never came.
There was some slight correction and FC fuel efficiency was changed instead.
So, your link generally does not say ANYTHING.
We have no idea what performance level of Odyssey FD will consider "fixed" and "as planned".