I just want to be sure that false accusations don't go unanswered.
False accusations.... sure.
I only see two possibilities here:
- Imperials decided to blanket UM without sniping, just crossing their fingers and hoping Hudson would mishandle his forts so badly that his systems weaponizing empire space would end up on the chopping block, which is a big ask given that the attack was obvious from the first day of the cycle. It's a risky move but the Imperials decided to try their luck anyway, do 2M merits and see what happens. The YOLO plan ended up working nicely for them somehow, and Hudson wasn't able to scrap bad systems.
- Imperials knew the only way to secure an advantageous result from a blanket UM without sniping was to have some specific Hudson systems forted. They knew their UM effort could end up helping Hudson instead of hurting him and that would be bad for Aisling's interests. Fast-forward a few days, the big UM operation starts and by Monday 35 systems have been conveniently forted. Some of these systems not forted in months are now forted to exactly 100%, no merits wasted. Clearly "randos" work! Said forting effectively removes any possibility of Hudson having control over which systems end up in turmoil and ZYADA claims victory again!
To sum it up: the Empire was either reckless by starting an unprecedented 2M merits attack even when the outcome was uncertain and depended on the hypothetical help from random Hudson pledges, or ZYADA knew what was going to happen with the forts, making sure Hudson couldn't take advantage of the attack, and that's why they went ahead with the plan in the first place.
Imperial leaders aren't new and definitely know what they're doing, and experience tells me that they wouldn't risk turning a big operation like this one into a federal victory, so... I think things are pretty clear. More clear than ever.