Would u guys pay more money for more stuff?
- Thread starter tigris115
- Start date
I'd pay more Money for the Inclusion of that much Foliage alone already 
Also 2 Exhibit Animals in one Pack would be so nice
For Example:
South America= Plumed Basilisk and Red Bellied Piranha
New Zealand= Tuatara and Giant Weta
Australia= Lord Howe Island Stick Insect and Frill necked Lizard
Mexico= Axolotl and Astyanax jordani
Also 2 Exhibit Animals in one Pack would be so nice
For Example:
South America= Plumed Basilisk and Red Bellied Piranha
New Zealand= Tuatara and Giant Weta
Australia= Lord Howe Island Stick Insect and Frill necked Lizard
Mexico= Axolotl and Astyanax jordani
Gladly 
Less than 1/3 times the money for almost double the content?
lol this is exactly what I laid out in discord yesterday, to the letter, when you asked how we would handle dlc if we were in charge. So yes, I think you know my answer.
Compared to the content your DLC idea seems underpriced.
But yes, I would pay more for more content. I guess most of us here would. I mean, the community is practically screaming for micro transaction in addition to normal and bigger DLCs. We are the hardcore part of PZ players here.
But yes, I would pay more for more content. I guess most of us here would. I mean, the community is practically screaming for micro transaction in addition to normal and bigger DLCs. We are the hardcore part of PZ players here.
Your scenario does seem underpriced compared to the current model. But yes, I would generally be very willing to pay more for more content.
Gosh yes I'd pay more to get more. I'd just be concerned about how long it would take to get it. FWIW I think $12.99 is probably too low an asking price for what you lined out in your original post.
10 habitat animals,
2 exhibit animals
80-100 building pieces
20-25 foliage pieces
At least $15. $20 seems to high but $13 seems to low....$16/$17 is right in the middle but is an odd dollar amount to price thing as people tend to like denominations of 5s. (or well 1 cent off 5s.), so I'd think $14.99 would be most likely.
10 habitat animals,
2 exhibit animals
80-100 building pieces
20-25 foliage pieces
At least $15. $20 seems to high but $13 seems to low....$16/$17 is right in the middle but is an odd dollar amount to price thing as people tend to like denominations of 5s. (or well 1 cent off 5s.), so I'd think $14.99 would be most likely.
Following from my earlier post, I think the price you’ve suggested is too low for it to be worthwhile for Frontier - $15- $16 would seem fair. TBH though, I’d prefer current sized / priced packs more often, rather than larger packs.
More DLC for more money? Certainly! ...although I echo the sentiments of others; that price you suggested seems too low...
Shut up and take my money!
I’ve really been hoping for a formula change in dlc, 4+1 isn’t cutting it for me. 7+1 I would take but I know we got to keep builders happy plus there’s scenery and trees that people really want.
I’ve really been hoping for a formula change in dlc, 4+1 isn’t cutting it for me. 7+1 I would take but I know we got to keep builders happy plus there’s scenery and trees that people really want.
That much content is pretty much the equivalent of 1 and a half DLCs, so $15 would actually be an equal price.
I think what you might be trying to say is if we got that much content every DLC would we be willing to pay. So instead of $40 a year for 4 DLCs, would we be willing to pay $52 a year for 4 DLCs with larger content.
To that, my answer is yes of course. However, I think if we got that much content, we would go from 4 DLCs per year to 3 DLCs per year.
I think what you might be trying to say is if we got that much content every DLC would we be willing to pay. So instead of $40 a year for 4 DLCs, would we be willing to pay $52 a year for 4 DLCs with larger content.
To that, my answer is yes of course. However, I think if we got that much content, we would go from 4 DLCs per year to 3 DLCs per year.
I'd pay more for a pack that had more stuff, proportional to the additional animals, plants, scenery, building pieces etc.
I don't know that money is the main reason the sets are the size they are, though. It takes time to design new critters (at least ones that aren't simple reskins) and to create new foliage. Not sure how much time it takes to create new textures for building pieces.
I'd prefer they not make DLC less frequent but larger, if they are currently working at capacity for creating new content. Four bigger DLCs a year, though. I'd be all over that!
I don't know that money is the main reason the sets are the size they are, though. It takes time to design new critters (at least ones that aren't simple reskins) and to create new foliage. Not sure how much time it takes to create new textures for building pieces.
I'd prefer they not make DLC less frequent but larger, if they are currently working at capacity for creating new content. Four bigger DLCs a year, though. I'd be all over that!