With these galactic coordinates :
distance = 27200 //different numbers from different sources,
longitude = 359,9442
latitude = -0,0462
I find the coordinates in ED should be around :
x = 26,49...................... // (inverted) Galactic Rotation direction
y = -21,93.................... // Galactic south=>Galactic North (vertical axis)
z = 27199,98............... // Sol=>Galactic center
In LY.
-----
Here is a converter
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14omuqE85tfTBnlCzvz7QrYo4hBldWVnAywe7aBijr0w/edit#gid=0
The sun is on the line, bellow the arrow, but not just bellow yet above the line...
So it's not the position of Sagit A* or any real star that is in question, they are at their correct position relatively to Sol as far as i've checked(say the 55 beta systems and a few more), but the whole generated galaxy alignement with the galactic equator instead of the galactic plane looks wrong.
__________________
-----
Here are the galactic longitude+latitude
http://simbad.u-strasbg.fr/simbad/sim-id?Ident=Sgr+A*
-----
And some info on galactic coordinates :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galactic_coordinate_system
Galactic coordinates use the galactic equator, not the galactic plane.
The angle is obviously bigger than in reallity.
Meaning that the "horizontal" grid is not the galactic plane, but the galactic equator in ED.
In 3300 we still wouldnt have crossed the galactic plane anyway.
Now has FD taken this into account? That should mean the galaxy would not be aligned with the horizontal grid.
When looking at the galaxy map it looks like both planes are merged or close somehow, too close to differenciate them. The 2 planes arein fact really close to each other anyway. at 25 000 LY away from the center, 20LY up or down wont do much of a difference.
The sun is on the line, bellow the arrow, not higher.
What do you think of that?