amd has gone the way of the dodo...for gaming that is
nvidia has the market share, the power, the cash. they put their tech in to the game devs hands and it pays dividends for us.
It pays dividends for who? The juddering lagfest that is VR because Nvidia cards don't have the required hardware to do the job properly? That you pay 75% more for a GTX 980 that is what, 10% faster than a 290X?
then there is the GPU's which im not too familliar with the differences, but there is good reason they are using 980s and titan X for oculus CV demos at the recent shows...
Who was using 980's and Titan X?
Do you know Oculus is ditching their own "Direct Mode" for AMD's Direct-To-Display?

Do you know that ALL the upcoming Oculus improvements like latest data latch, rolling shutter and async timewarp have come from collaboration with AMD?

Do you know that Valve got double the performance on Vive with Crossfired AMD cards and still haven't got anything from Nvidia?

2 hours to do something that Nvidia has been talking about for 6 months.
Oculus's main driver guy had this to say about AMD's VR -

I mean how much evidence do you need? You have Oculus and Valve telling you that Nvidia is basically nowhere on VR. The best we get from Nvidia is that you can expect 40-50% if lucky with VR SLI when AMD has already been tested on Vive at double that - that means that at best they'll have the same performance with their high-end SLI that AMD will get with their mid-range Crossfire. This is not stuff that is easy to fix, especially when you don't have the hardware.
As a bonus, guess what Oculus says about Nvidias VR Direct?
https://answers.oculus.com/questions/76/is-nvidia-working-with-oculus-to-implement-vr-dire.html
"VR Direct" is a term NVIDIA introduced in September at the time of the Maxwell launch. Very few details have emerged. We haven't worked with them on it.
the flagship amd card right now is not as powerful as a $350 gtx 970...
The flagship AMD card beats the Titan X by around 20%.
Last edited: