Man o man, is the Zorgon-Peterson firm letting an opportunity slip right through their fingers.
They have a monopoly on the light transport market, they're the Volkswagen if the galaxy with the Hauler and the Adder. And they have a great upper-mid-level fighter craft too. They have all the brand recognition advantage they'd need to become a direct rival of Lakon in the mid and upper range freighter markets, and they're simply not doing it.
Since Faucon DeLacey bought out ZP a few dacedes ago, it's not surprising that they're not competing directly with Faulcon in roles the two companies share, but last time I checked, Faulcon was competing with Lakon in the upper mid range transport and multirole markets, and they own the Zorgon-Peterson brand, which is an imminently recognizable brand -- there may be only 3 Zorgon-Peterson ships on the market but nearly every Commander has owned at least one of them.
It would be simplicity itself to leverage ZP's successful Hauler design and scale it up to compete with the Type 6 and Type 7. Name brand recognition of the Hauler would make commanders trust this upgrade over a completely new and unfamiliar company. Brand loyalty would play entirely in ZP's favor as it scaled its design up to meed the demand -- and they're simply not doing it.
Zorgon-Peterson should have between two and three larger model transports competing directly with the Type 6, type 7 and possibly type 9. They should definitely be on the market. It's corporate negligence not to be competing in this area for a company so well known for the transport ships they offer. Especially if they also offered the advantages of being slightly faster or more maneuverable at the cost of armanent that doesn't do the Types any real good anyway. Or if they had a slight advantage in jump range at the cost of thruster speed -- some wrinkle that gave them a niche in game. I'd probably fly one if they did.
I also think I'd trust ZP to make large scale transport ships that didn't look quite so much like flying blocks of solid bland like Lakon's very industrial and Spartan offerings.
They have a monopoly on the light transport market, they're the Volkswagen if the galaxy with the Hauler and the Adder. And they have a great upper-mid-level fighter craft too. They have all the brand recognition advantage they'd need to become a direct rival of Lakon in the mid and upper range freighter markets, and they're simply not doing it.
Since Faucon DeLacey bought out ZP a few dacedes ago, it's not surprising that they're not competing directly with Faulcon in roles the two companies share, but last time I checked, Faulcon was competing with Lakon in the upper mid range transport and multirole markets, and they own the Zorgon-Peterson brand, which is an imminently recognizable brand -- there may be only 3 Zorgon-Peterson ships on the market but nearly every Commander has owned at least one of them.
It would be simplicity itself to leverage ZP's successful Hauler design and scale it up to compete with the Type 6 and Type 7. Name brand recognition of the Hauler would make commanders trust this upgrade over a completely new and unfamiliar company. Brand loyalty would play entirely in ZP's favor as it scaled its design up to meed the demand -- and they're simply not doing it.
Zorgon-Peterson should have between two and three larger model transports competing directly with the Type 6, type 7 and possibly type 9. They should definitely be on the market. It's corporate negligence not to be competing in this area for a company so well known for the transport ships they offer. Especially if they also offered the advantages of being slightly faster or more maneuverable at the cost of armanent that doesn't do the Types any real good anyway. Or if they had a slight advantage in jump range at the cost of thruster speed -- some wrinkle that gave them a niche in game. I'd probably fly one if they did.
I also think I'd trust ZP to make large scale transport ships that didn't look quite so much like flying blocks of solid bland like Lakon's very industrial and Spartan offerings.
Last edited: