No Single Player offline Mode then?

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
what if it does not live up to the standards people made? as the newsletter implied there will be nothing more on launch but they promised to fill the gaps after launch

Well I don't have time to wait for an always online game that promises a truly dynamic galaxy at some point in the future, but that delivers a static galaxy that could be played completely offline in the now. In a couple of months I'll be without internet until roughly the same time next year, (due to work), so of course I'll find something else to do and bid adieu to modern day Elite.
 
I have spent the last hr or so reading posts on this subject in a number of threads so my apologies if i have missed recent posts.

I have tried not to post anything negative regarding this testing process, yes i have had issues but tried to be constructive not dismissive.

With due respect to you Mr Brookes the quote above is actually a problem for Frontier to solve and not those that have "bought into the vision" of Elite Dangerous. Frontier have stated that there will be an Offline version of the game , ie no internet required to play it. People that have backed the game and continued to test it "Online" as testers do were quite happy to find bugs/issues happy in the knowledge that come release they could unplug the internet and play.

From my view point Elite Dangerous has been trailed as Elite (1984) updated for (2014) hence the 30 yr celebration. I would guess the vast majority of Kickstarters Alpha backers are people that played the original. They want the game to be PvP and PvE for todays generation and years to come but they want it also to be what is was 30 yrs ago, offline and single pilot doing what they want to do. If that means Frontier need to make 2 games within 1 then thats what they have to do.

Give people the experience they backed with hard cash and time testing dont forget we all want this game to be a success.

Hats off to the Devs for what they have given us, this is not a moan at them or you Mr Brookes, just an honest observation.


This was originally posted on page 41 seems like a lifetime ago and i thought at the time it was well constructed and thought out but what do i know.

I agree with a lot posts that we are going round in circles. Whilst it does not affect me directly i would have liked an Offline option.

I have suggested (Via PM) that maybe the time has come for the forum to be taken down for an hr so that Frontier can sit down,see what Genuine concerns people have and try to come up with a way forward that actually keeps the release on schedule and are actually back in charge of what the press reacts to, rather than reacting to the press.

people on here and who are testing the pre release version actually want it to be a success
 
Perhaps it's this:

From the ED Eula:

(emphasis mine)
8. In-Game Advertising
The Game may incorporate technology (which may be provided by Frontier or third party service providers engaged by Frontier (each a “Dynamic Advertising Provider”)) which enables advertising to be uploaded into the Game on your PC, and changed while the Game is being played on-line. In order that the Dynamic Advertising Provider is able to direct advertising appropriate to your Game and geographic region, as well as to the correct location within the computer game, certain non-personally identifiable data and information may be retrieved and retained by the Dynamic Advertising Provider including your I.P. address, geographic location, in-game position, and information concerning the appearance of advertising visible during your gameplay (for example, the length of time an item of advertising was visible, the dimensions of the advertisements). In addition, the Dynamic Advertising Provider may assign a unique identification number which is stored on your PC and which is used to monitor and calculate the number of views of dynamic advertising during gameplay. None of the information collected for this purpose including the identification number can be used to identify you.


The technology employed by Dynamic Advertising Providers may be located outside your country of residence (including outside of the European Union).

Where a Game incorporates dynamic advertising technology, the technology which serves the provision of dynamic in-game advertising is integrated within the Game. This means that if you do not want to receive dynamic advertising, you should only play the game when you are not connected to the Internet.



Isn't that just peachy? Targeted advertising, in your game! Is that an immersion-breaker, or what?

The bit I've highlighted at the very end is especially rich..

Because now, if you unplug, the game won't even work.. So you'll basically be forced to watch any advertising that FD care to sell to third parties. You can't even opt out... can you say "captive audience"? I knew you could!

Maybe it's not the whole reason for pulling offline play, but who's to say it wasn't a factor in the decision? If people can play offline, how can FD push advertising content to their game? And after all, we have no idea just who the anonymous investors that FD partnered with are.. (and please don't insult my intelligence by claiming there aren't any, everyone.. it's pretty clear the KS on its own wasn't sufficient to fund the game - that was about testing the waters.. seeing if sufficient demand was there - someone, or several someones, ponied up a big chunk of cash to help get ED made.)

(And it seem to me rather likely that the same anonymous investors could be behind the push to rush this game to market before it's truly ready)

Great catch, and wow... creepy. Still, likely nothing a simple hosts file edit can't fix. There will be no ads in my game--I've paid these goons enough already.
 
I agree that it does not clearly state that there will be no offline mode. It would be good to have official clarification about whether or not there will be offline single player mode. I personally would love an offline single player mode as I love to use trainers. Trainers only work in offline single player mode.

It's confirmed, sadly; Andrew Sayers compiled a list of Brookes' quotes explaining that there is indeed no offline mode.
 

Vlodec

Banned
I really wish the mods would just close this thread. Its gone around the same point about 4000 times now, and the predominant contributors have been extremely dismissive of even the staff's completely valid arguments, reasons, and viewpoints. And on more than one occasion, insinuations at legal action have been made (bordering on threats)... this is just plain childish.

Time to give up the chase. Offline is NOT coming.
Want your money back? Do something about it, stop dragging others down with you (as you seem to be intent on anyway, with your intention of withdrawing funds from the development company, due to your misunderstanding of ONE KEY LINE on the KS page).


I, personally, want my positive beta forum back. I (and MANY others) want to keep testing, I (and MANY others) want to see the game succeed, while the pessimists here are convinced it has already failed.

Closing the thread J.M. will make matters far worse. Trust me.

And please try to understand that, while you and others like you are not impacted by this decision, yet others are. The fact that you don't understand the anger - and the need to express it - is not in itself a good reason to call for an end to all dispute.

And here's something else for you to groan at. We can only guess how many backers haven't yet heard the news and, believe me, will want their say when they do. Worse yet, the later they get to hear about it the greater their rage.
 
I really wish the mods would just close this thread. Its gone around the same point about 4000 times now, and the predominant contributors have been extremely dismissive of even the staff's completely valid arguments, reasons, and viewpoints. And on more than one occasion, insinuations at legal action have been made (bordering on threats)... this is just plain childish.

Time to give up the chase. Offline is NOT coming.
Want your money back? Do something about it, stop dragging others down with you (as you seem to be intent on anyway, with your intention of withdrawing funds from the development company, due to your misunderstanding of ONE KEY LINE on the KS page).


I, personally, want my positive beta forum back. I (and MANY others) want to keep testing, I (and MANY others) want to see the game succeed, while the pessimists here are convinced it has already failed.
Well, may be FD considers an open discussion a more positive thing, than people calling their lawyers and prepare going to the courts?

I understood the statement from the Kickstarter FAQ as a "true" Offline version! And I can absolutely understand, that people who have crap bandwidth, or stability problems with internet connections, can't just shake it off, that FD is more or less dropping "Offline", as it may be their only way to play it, more or less.

If you would have paid lots of money and now they would tell you that beginning of Gamma "the FD servers are not reachable from your country, but it is for the better performance and experience of the other players", what would you think?

Original Kickstarter FAQ:
Will the game be DRM-free?
Yes, the game code will not include DRM (Digital Rights Management), but there will be server authentication when you connect for multiplayer and/or updates and to synchronise with the server.

Last updated: Mon, Dec 10 2012 12:54 PM CET
How will single player work? Will I need to connect to a server to play?
The galaxy for Elite: Dangerous is a shared universe maintained by a central server. All of the meta data for the galaxy is shared between players. This includes the galaxy itself as well as transient information like economies. The aim here is that a player's actions will influence the development of the galaxy, without necessarily having to play multiplayer.

The other important aspect for us is that we can seed the galaxy with events, often these events will be triggered by player actions. With a living breathing galaxy players can discover new and interesting things long after they have started playing.

Update! The above is the intended single player experience. However it will be possible to have a single player game without connecting to the galaxy server. You won't get the features of the evolving galaxy (although we will investigate minimising those differences) and you probably won't be able to sync between server and non-server (again we'll investigate).

Last updated: Tue, Dec 11 2012 10:56 AM CET

EDIT: I'm lucky to have a sufficient bandwidth, yet I have seen enough trouble with "occasional" crashes, disconnects, etc. in other games , as well as in E: D... I absolutely hope they manage to cover the launch date and we don't see "server unavailable", "server time out", server disconnects" regularly!
 
Last edited:
honestly it's just wrong, you lot have been playing / enjoying this game for weeks and months and now you want your money back and Frontier deserve derision ... you should all be ashamed of yourselves IMO
 
If the back end databases that control the persistent elements of the galaxy were open to exploitation if publicly visible (despite expending effort to try and secure it), then I doubt you will ever see solo offline. That would be too great a risk commercially and one could only imagine if the states were reversed I.e. no multiplayer and only solo offline. From Michael's statements its one or the other game type (not both), so which would you choose?

I'd be fine without multiplayer (it isn't needed in an Elite game), but I'd also be perfectly fine with a "barebones" server with just the catalogue stars (those don't belong to Frontier) and a way to enter our own galactic seed (so the galaxy isn't the same as the online one and we can't see their precious "secrets") and custom missions and whatnot (the modding community would take care of fleshing that out), as would most of the people (if not all) who won't be able to play an online only game.
 
I really wish the mods would just close this thread. Its gone around the same point about 4000 times now, and the predominant contributors have been extremely dismissive of even the staff's completely valid arguments, reasons, and viewpoints. And on more than one occasion, insinuations at legal action have been made (bordering on threats)... this is just plain childish.

It may well have gone in circles a few times, but it is contained in a single thread. Closing it would mean more work for the moderators and would end up in the same situation of a single contained thread. One which you can ignore if you so wish.
 
honestly it's just wrong, you lot have been playing / enjoying this game for weeks and months and now you want your money back and Frontier deserve derision ... you should all be ashamed of yourselves IMO

Nope, they have actually been testing FD's software for free whilst also giving financial backing...the game isn't released yet.
 
Last edited:
A fully offline experience would be unacceptably limited and static compared to the dynamic, ever unfolding experience we are delivering."
THIS is a thing of a standpoint. Many peoples would be happy to have a fully offline experience how promised. It wasn't even promised with all feature of the online part of the game.

Things possible told not beeing in the fully offline part:

1. Static game world:
Yes, this was stated and would mean, that special events wouldn't be in the offline game. For me it would be okay.
Alternative, this could be random or the player could even have some influence (his own offline play galaxy).

2. game data from the online server:
Well specific things like anomalies who give a lot of money in the online part could be random or missing in the offline gameplay.
The seed outsite the known universe could be random.
The offline game could be released a month after the final game. A lot of data in the core area would be already discovered and other datas would be in the internet already. So no problem then.

3. cheat security:
Well, for the offline part i don't think something like this is nessesary. It would only a try to dictate, how the player have to play the game. If they want to cheat, its their thing. Some options like the already mentioned galaxy options could aswell help the player fit their private play style.
For the online and offline interconnectivity. Exporting player from the online to the offline world should be a given. The other way around shouldn't be possible of course.

4. own save games:
Yes, thats aswell one of the points i was looking forward. To have my own save games and save different states of the game and have full control.

Things i was looking for aswell:
Possibility to pause the game: Its an benefit to pause the game and make something other we have to do in this time. So we still can play if we don't have so much time. Some peoples have their reason for it and i think such problems are normal in life.
Play completly offline: Having a own gameplay without interferencing from other player or interference other players. This is happening aswell in the single player online mode. Only the ships are blend out, but the online connection and the results of it are still there.
Aswell with a offline game, you are way more flexible. Many of the points like lost connection, no connection, etc. has been already mentioned.

I could life with some cuts in the solo offline play and aswell, when it would come out some time later. But that they have completly canceled it, is something, i can't and don't want to accept.
I even understand, that they want to secure their game. The game could try to connect by startup of the launcher and verify by updating the game version. But it should be able to start even without internet connection in the offline mode.

But well let's see what the official statement would be. I personally feel betrayed. And yes, the question is, if the game would have made the kickstarter with the knowledge, that it won't have an offline mode after all. At least i would have been more reserved by pledging. Yes, they would most likely make it, if they stay to their plan and cancel the offline mode completly and not even give it later. But donno, if they want to build the game on a huge lie.
If their want to deliver it later, then they should announce it and i will cancel my withdraw plans, because this would be okay. For game developments there are no time limits. If it takes some more time, its okay.

And yes, the anger and frustration of some peoples could be very large and they could try to sabotage the servers with DDoS, hack the servers and change values to crash the game flow and trying to crash the economy. I have witnessed such attacks already before in online games or plattforms and they can be really evil and aswell get the server down for longer time. And looking at the decision now, Elite might be a very large target. The only way to play it in this attacks would be the announced offline mode. How wait. Right it is cancelled.

And yes, Dogus (Godus). Haven't put so much money in the game. But they still try. Its one thing to simple cut a feature or to got it not very good implemented. If the game is bad, but they included what they promised, even if it isn't very well made, well then they tried and we have set on the wrong horse. But cutting a feature and not even trying to make it (even when its a cut down not as good version then) is not the right way.

And again to close this post. Every player has an other though about gameplay and what they want. Some see online better, some offline. Elite Dangerous was announced as both of it. One of the reason offline and online player pledged for it. Elite Dangerous wasn't announced as an online game. It was one part of the game and the game was announced as both. Now it was announced to be online only. After they got their money to develop it.
Yes, some peoples don't unterstand, why we are so angry. I personally don't understand, how some peoples can see such a cancellation, of a already promised feature to get the funding, not as something to be really upset. Personally i aswell see it as very disrespectful from Frontier against the peoples who pledged because of the offline feature. Even when they get their money back. They wanted a game they can aswell play offline, pledged and joined the community, because it was promised and then: "Okay, thanks for giving the money, that we can make our dream game. We told you, that it would be offline, but hey, it isn't important for us and now we where able to make what we want. You want the game we promised? No, yust take your money back and ***. We don't need you anymore. And that you want the game you hoped for is not important for us." Yes, its not intended, but its exactly, how it looks like actually.
 
Last edited:
If you would have payed and now they would tell you that beginning of Gamma "the FD servers are not reachable from your country, but it is for the better performance and experience of the other players", what would you think?

Original Kickstarter FAQ:


This ^

Actually, think about it. Seriously, pretend if you have to.
 
No Off-Line = NO BUY
Short but says all...In the Review of the Games THEY will write..."Wonderfull Game in a Living Galaxy, and as you be allways online all action effects all other, not depending if they Play Open/Group/Solo.But to fullfil that you must play allways online. Offline will be canceled in the last Minute due Problems by generating this Wonderfull for Offline Players." .... and this sentence will kill the Game, for all which don´t like online. And even if you don´t believe ... there are still Player which read REAL Game-Magazins, and that people will than maybe never buy....
 
Last edited:
honestly it's just wrong, you lot have been playing / enjoying this game for weeks and months and now you want your money back and Frontier deserve derision ... you should all be ashamed of yourselves IMO

Really now, sweeping generalisations? The only thing that deserves derision is your post.

This thread is like TV, every man and his dog is trying to get their 15minutes of fame.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom