No Single Player offline Mode then?

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.

BOA

B
Oh come on, are you trolling or are you serious? It's been documented many times in this thread where both David Braben and Michael Brookes both confirmed the offline mode was a feature of the game (up until two days ago that is). See link below:

https://onedrive.live.com/?cid=8fa4...17&ithint=folder,png&authkey=!AB8ihXyry1B55fw

Lol 1 Year ago. The Other Statements are from a Moderator, no fd Developer or Manager.

So Come on.

We live in the 21th Century. Everyone Could have Internet today.
 
Last edited:
Not sure what you mean with ´There's just so many posts I've written and deleted. I'm still in shock. It's like being dumped, you just don't want to believe it's happening.
´. Is this for the ED forums and do you mean a moderator or else has deleted your posts? Do you have examples of this? This is the first timeI hear about such a thing, IF it is true. If true if would mean they are CENSORING the forums. Again this is new to me and thats why I ask for confirmation. Again I haven´t personally seen this happening and this MOAT (mother of all threads) is still open and haven´t seen stuff removed. But heh if its deleted I would probbly not see it anyway.....

There is no censorship going on that I can detect.

I am guessing he meant that this decision has shocked him so much that he has had lots of trouble conveying and expressing his thoughts and feelings; hence with the starting, stopping and deleting of multiple posts.
 
There's just no "fixing" this incredible blunder. Even if FD pulled a "Microsoft", similar to the Xbox One debacle, or a "SimCity"and delivered an offline mode, it's way too late. The press has finally picked up on it in full as just about every PC game site now has an article with the comments section seething with vitriol. A company's reputation never recovers from that kind of press.

It's so sad.

There's just so many posts I've written and deleted. I'm still in shock. It's like being dumped, you just don't want to believe it's happening.

I do feel for the staff at Frontier though as they are the "kids" in all this. Divorce with kids is always bad and the kids gets the worst of it even though it's not their fault.. I don't blame anyone at FD other than David, The buck stops with him, it's his baby. He needs to "man up' and address this issue head one and do it quickly. I don't expect it to happen though, I hope I'm wrong but, given the way he handled it in the newsletter I have to believe he'll ignore it or maybe give it a "one liner" at best. I'll be more than happy to be proved wrong.

People have overreacted massively, and had a right tantrum in effect trying to punish FD by doing as much damage as possible.

The vindicative, destructive stupidity of this behavior boggles the mind. People are petty, nasty creatures and can't behave like civilized beings.
***
I wonder how many even realise that if Frontier put half a years's effort into creating a fully off-line mode for the game, that is half a year lost from actually putting in the features in the DDF into the main (online) game, and from working on the expansions.

Even those who are facing bad internet connections and such, do they think that situation will never recover. Do they think the world is going into a less-connected age, and they will forever be without reliable net access? A game that is planned to be developed over a decade should be worth embracing and supporting even if you are facing limited access in the immediate- or near future.

Such hateful, vindicative mob actions. Reminds me of the bloody gamergate idiocy.
 
I just created a ticket through customer service requesting a full refund, if it is true that they have cancelled off-line mode and never intend to implement it.

Deal breaker.

Bait and switch money grab...

Shame on you FD!
 
But that would be like... 1984... all over again. I played that offline, single player game, 30 year ago. It was fun then but it was BEFORE t'internet. Why would I want to go back to it? We're living in the future now, kinda... ya know. Internet of Everything. If my fridge can talk to my toaster, why can't I expect my game to connect to the central servers and provide a consistent, integral playing experience. Don't you people have broadband? Sheesh, I was playing on hotel wifi last week while travelling. And I've just switched over from the BT home wifi, to see if using my iPhone 3G as a hotspot works, and the game played just as well on 3G wifi as it does on BT wifi.

Anyone posting to this board must be connected, so I don't see why FD asking people to connect once in a while to sync the galaxy is a big issue, or am I missing something? You would want to synch for game updates and patches, right? It was frustrating in the 1980s (not with Elite) that you would buy a packaged game and if it worked, fine, but if it didn't there were no patches to download, you just had a game that didn't work.

It's time to jump into the 21st (and then the 34th) century with both feet. Embrace ubiquitous always-on wifi. I was at a conference last week. A presenter talking about megatrends and looking out to 2030 put up Maslow's hierarchy of needs. They'd added an eighth, "WIFI", and later another presenter built on it and added "BATTERY". This is where life (in the Western world, and increasingly elsewhere) is at.

My reading of the newsletter is there is an offline game, it simply requires connecting periodically to the central servers to synch up. That sounds like an offline game to me.
 
People have overreacted massively, and had a right tantrum in effect trying to punish FD by doing as much damage as possible.

The vindicative, destructive stupidity of this behavior boggles the mind. People are petty, nasty creatures and can't behave like civilized beings.
***
I wonder how many even realise that if Frontier put half a years's effort into creating a fully off-line mode for the game, that is half a year lost from actually putting in the features in the DDF into the main (online) game, and from working on the expansions.

Even those who are facing bad internet connections and such, do they think that situation will never recover. Do they think the world is going into a less-connected age, and they will forever be without reliable net access? A game that is planned to be developed over a decade should be worth embracing and supporting even if you are facing limited access in the immediate- or near future.

Such hateful, vindicative mob actions. Reminds me of the bloody gamergate idiocy.

What amazes me is this weird disconnect where every connection problem is the customer's fault.

Not FD's for having their single point of access.

Not FD's for putting that single point of access at the end of 20,000km of cable.

Not FD's for requiring continuous high bandwidth communication for every stupid little thing.

I mean - if this was at all competent in any way or resembled the hosting you would get from a modern title - let alone one that cost minimum, $75 buy in so far - I could understand it better.

But it's cheap, amateurish stuff that can't possibly work for many of their customers. But that's the customer's fault. Of course it is.
 
People have overreacted massively, and had a right tantrum in effect trying to punish FD by doing as much damage as possible.

The vindicative, destructive stupidity of this behavior boggles the mind. People are petty, nasty creatures and can't behave like civilized beings.
***
I wonder how many even realise that if Frontier put half a years's effort into creating a fully off-line mode for the game, that is half a year lost from actually putting in the features in the DDF into the main (online) game, and from working on the expansions.

Even those who are facing bad internet connections and such, do they think that situation will never recover. Do they think the world is going into a less-connected age, and they will forever be without reliable net access? A game that is planned to be developed over a decade should be worth embracing and supporting even if you are facing limited access in the immediate- or near future.

Such hateful, vindicative mob actions. Reminds me of the bloody gamergate idiocy.

+100. Totally agree.
 
People have overreacted massively, and had a right tantrum in effect trying to punish FD by doing as much damage as possible.

The vindicative, destructive stupidity of this behavior boggles the mind. People are petty, nasty creatures and can't behave like civilized beings.
***
I wonder how many even realise that if Frontier put half a years's effort into creating a fully off-line mode for the game, that is half a year lost from actually putting in the features in the DDF into the main (online) game, and from working on the expansions.

Even those who are facing bad internet connections and such, do they think that situation will never recover. Do they think the world is going into a less-connected age, and they will forever be without reliable net access? A game that is planned to be developed over a decade should be worth embracing and supporting even if you are facing limited access in the immediate- or near future.

Such hateful, vindicative mob actions. Reminds me of the bloody gamergate idiocy.

what shall I say...."Forgive me my Idiocy as I forgive you your Clearance which enlighten my way the Thruth about all. I never will speak anything against the holyness of the might Developer and FD ... And forget to feel all empahty for this poor not Onliner. I will only listen what the Truth Community member decide what I shall think, and never again wrote about things with out their allowness" ...is that really what you want?
 
Last edited:
People have overreacted massively, and had a right tantrum in effect trying to punish FD by doing as much damage as possible.

The vindicative, destructive stupidity of this behavior boggles the mind. People are petty, nasty creatures and can't behave like civilized beings.
***
I wonder how many even realise that if Frontier put half a years's effort into creating a fully off-line mode for the game, that is half a year lost from actually putting in the features in the DDF into the main (online) game, and from working on the expansions.

Even those who are facing bad internet connections and such, do they think that situation will never recover. Do they think the world is going into a less-connected age, and they will forever be without reliable net access? A game that is planned to be developed over a decade should be worth embracing and supporting even if you are facing limited access in the immediate- or near future.

Such hateful, vindicative mob actions. Reminds me of the bloody gamergate idiocy.

Recent Headlines:
US aid worker Peter Kassig beheaded by Islamic State
Thousands dying in Africa from Ebola
Suicide Bombers Kill 13, Injure 65 In Azare
18 Killed, 13 Injured in Massive Chinese Plant Fire
Report: 1 in 30 children in US homeless
Liverpool loses to Chelsea 2-1
Frontier removes offline portion of game in development

It's a video game!

Some adjustment in perspective is needed in some cases.
 

wolverine2710

Tutorial & Guide Writer
Hello!

Nice thread you’ve got here. I love what you’ve done with the place!

Bit crowded though :O

I’ve been following all this and while there’s little chance of this being read in such a huge thread, I just wanted to first give people on both ‘sides’ some sheepyhugs!

*sheepyhugs*

There! Better?

Good! :D

So a few thoughts…

This sudden dropping of ‘offline’ can only be disappointing to those expecting it to be a part of the game. I have a bit of a dodgy connection - I get dropouts a lot - so it’s not ideal for me.

For those unable to play at all due to the announcement, I sympathise.

I really do :(

It must be horrible to have waited so long for this game… to get emotionally and financially invested in it, then to be told a month before release that you’re not getting the game you thought you were.

It must be really gutting, and I am sorry you have to go through that :(

It’s been handled pretty badly, hasn’t it? I appreciate the input from Michael, but still, it comes off as incredibly defensive (understandable with shouty upset people) when sympathetic might have worked a bit better.

I know emotions are running high. For those affected, please try and remain civil. Wait to hear what FD says in response to your concerns. Get a refund if you feel you have to after that, heartbreaking though that will no doubt be.

For those unaffected: People are different. People’s situations are different. Not everyone has great internet (I don’t!). Please try and understand how those affected are feeling. Substitute ‘offline mode’ for something you might consider central to your enjoyment of the game. It helps!

No one wants the game to fail (I love it - it fills the blanks much better than what my imagination tried to do back on the original Elite in the 80s!).

But people are upset, and understandably so.

While I am personally less affected by the news (though still affected), I do have some concerns, a few of which have been brought up before, so forgive me for putting my own spin on previously uttered thoughts:

Firstly, yes, things change during game development. It happens. People far smarter than I will debate as to how technically feasible it would be to call offline code as opposed to ‘in the cloud’ code/database stuff at key points.

I hope we get to hear details about how and when this was decided, details about what was attempted, why it didn’t work, etc etc.

I find that people are more receptive to disappointing news, in general, if you’re up-front and honest with them, and can give them solid, understandable reasons for why something is the way it is.

Treat people with a little respect!

Personally, I’m not a fan of ‘games as a service’. This appears to be the way forwards for some, and it just doesn’t make me feel like I *own* the game.

The risk with an ‘always online’ game is that the servers will go away, and there’s nothing you can do about it. People still pine over City of Heroes. Star Wars Galaxies. Many EA sports titles.

(ok, I may have exaggerated about pining for that last one, but as new games in a series are released, older versions have their multiplayer component turned off).

You hear it more and more often: ‘Servers shut down, can’t play the game anymore.’

An offline mode means the game is mine, I can play it when and where I want to, and I can play it when/if the servers go down.

As an offline game, ED is not a service. It’s a game. And it has an online component. Yay if you want that! But it’s yours for as long as you can run it! No reliance on a 3rd party! Double yay!

An online only game has no such guarantees unfortunately.

It’s an increasing worry, as more and more games move towards being presented as a ‘service’. I personally see it as being ‘User Hostile’, but that’s just the cynic in me.

The cynic in me (he’s in here somewhere!) would say that offering the game as a service benefits FD a huge amount:

Market stuff is simplified, because real people are buying/selling stuff. No need for a complex simulation.
Anti-Piracy/DRM
Security (maybe?)
Offline people won’t buy ship skins. Or any future ‘add-ons’. This is *really* cynical. The game becomes more an online storefront for virtual goodies. Instant money!
Maybe some of the ‘secrets’ that would be spilled are different skins for the ships/future add-ons. So to avoid people getting them ‘for free’ if they hack the code on their hard drive, they have to go online.


Like I said, that’s the cynic in me. There may be far more benign/non conspiracy theory explanations/reasons, but the way this has been handled has probably opened a can of worms there.

About piracy:

Having an ‘offline’ mode may lead to piracy. However, having to log into a bought account to go online could mean the offline mode effectively acts as a demo to what Frontier itself considers ‘the main game’.

Just a thought. Don’t take it too seriously. I’d never condone actually pirating a game (I make them myself - I know what it’s like to see hundreds on the online leaderboards and yet you’ve only sold 80 copies. Disheartening to say the least :( )


So, the way I see it there are a few possible outcomes (and I’ve been to several possible futures…)

1. FD goes back on this decision with some trust lost, but confidence can be rebuilt. This might not happen straight away, but a definite date could be put forward for an offline version. Apologies all round, tea and free ships for all!

2. FD sticks to its guns. I don’t know what happens then - I guess we’ll see the fallout (if any) soon. But at the very least, some players/backers will be lost, but more damaging, trust may be lost.

3. An enterprising fellow/woman creates an ‘offline’ patch - much like what happened with Sim City - proving that it *is* possible to play offline just fine. I think this would be the worst possible outcome for FD...

4. ….

5. Profit?


So where am I?


Personally, I’ve not logged mega hours on the beta as (as I've mentioned) my connection’s not great and also I’m inherently lazy, and don’t fancy starting over time and again - better to wait for the main event!

What I have played has mainly been Online Solo. And yes, my connection has led to some ‘issues’ - disconnects that lead to missed mission deadlines, lag that has meant I zigged when I should have zagged - and so on and so forth.

It’s not ideal. Far from it. But I’ll persevere.

Because I really love the game right now. Seriously. I’m looking forward to the 22nd (though I’ll be out celebrating another cycle around the sun, I will be v. much looking forward to the Monday after!).


The add-on ship skins are a bit of a concern. The always online is a bigger concern. It doesn’t pay to be benign in game design it seems. I was hoping FD would prove me wrong.

Time will tell.

I’ve rambled. I’m sorry! Be good to each other!

QS =D

VERy good post, rep +1.
I do hope that David Braben himself gives an official statement (technical not PR buzz like the newsletter) about the whole situation. In particular why it took FD till basically the last newsletter before gamma hits to tell about the cancellation. Ok, the last one would be Friday, but if they had dropped the bomb then basically their whole premiere event, gamma release would have gone up in smoke.
 
Last edited:
People have overreacted massively, and had a right tantrum in effect trying to punish FD by doing as much damage as possible.

The vindicative, destructive stupidity of this behavior boggles the mind. People are petty, nasty creatures and can't behave like civilized beings.
***
I wonder how many even realise that if Frontier put half a years's effort into creating a fully off-line mode for the game, that is half a year lost from actually putting in the features in the DDF into the main (online) game, and from working on the expansions.

Even those who are facing bad internet connections and such, do they think that situation will never recover. Do they think the world is going into a less-connected age, and they will forever be without reliable net access? A game that is planned to be developed over a decade should be worth embracing and supporting even if you are facing limited access in the immediate- or near future.

Such hateful, vindicative mob actions. Reminds me of the bloody gamergate idiocy.

Well I have to agree. I'm not condoning the vitriol lobbed at FD on game sites, it's just a fact that it is happening. I, for one, have limited my voice to this forum, unless you count the dozens of positive, supportive posts I've made on game sites all over the internet.
 
Last edited:
Well for me it's down to these two things:

1) I don't want my ability to play to be dependent on what is looking like extremely 'dodgy' third party hosted servers. I want this game to be something I can return to in periods during the remainder of my life basically, and I doubt that will be possible without a purely offline version.

2) Unless the multiplayer aspects (communication etc) shape up in a BIG way I'll be playing SOLO mode and the only noticable effects of an online universe for me will be the negative ones - that is markets overrun, everything explored and stuff mined to smithereens. Without ever being able to interact properly with these people.
 
what shall I say...."Forgive me my Idiocy as I forgive you your Clearance which enlighten my way the Thruth about all. I never will speak anything against the holyness of the might Developer and FD ... And forget to feel all empahty for this poor not Onliner. I will only listen what the Truth Community member decide what I shall think, and never again wrote about things with out their allowness" ...is that really what you want?

You forgot to add "And I will drink the kool aid!" ;)
 
AWS server auth management with P2P netcode. It's the kind of unholy marriage you would imagine someone in a university saying "I want you to develop the absolute worst mixture of protocols and handshakes for a video game, and in such a way that it impacts a player regardless of whether they play solo or with friends."
 
But that would be like... 1984... all over again. I played that offline, single player game, 30 year ago. It was fun then but it was BEFORE t'internet. Why would I want to go back to it? We're living in the future now, kinda... ya know. Internet of Everything. If my fridge can talk to my toaster, why can't I expect my game to connect to the central servers and provide a consistent, integral playing experience. Don't you people have broadband? Sheesh, I was playing on hotel wifi last week while travelling. And I've just switched over from the BT home wifi, to see if using my iPhone 3G as a hotspot works, and the game played just as well on 3G wifi as it does on BT wifi.

Anyone posting to this board must be connected, so I don't see why FD asking people to connect once in a while to sync the galaxy is a big issue, or am I missing something? You would want to synch for game updates and patches, right? It was frustrating in the 1980s (not with Elite) that you would buy a packaged game and if it worked, fine, but if it didn't there were no patches to download, you just had a game that didn't work.

It's time to jump into the 21st (and then the 34th) century with both feet. Embrace ubiquitous always-on wifi. I was at a conference last week. A presenter talking about megatrends and looking out to 2030 put up Maslow's hierarchy of needs. They'd added an eighth, "WIFI", and later another presenter built on it and added "BATTERY". This is where life (in the Western world, and increasingly elsewhere) is at.

My reading of the newsletter is there is an offline game, it simply requires connecting periodically to the central servers to synch up. That sounds like an offline game to me.

Sigh. This is why this thread is so long. Because no-one reads anything before jumping in and posting.

Lots of people have either no or intermittent internet because reasons. Unavoidable, unfixable reasons. Go back and look.

And your last point about there being an offline game has kind of been weaselled out of by Michael who said that an internet connection would be needed from 'time to time'. If I recall, he admitted this meant like every time you did something in game like purchases, ship changes, etc. So it's not really offline in any way that would make a difference.
 
I've loved my time in this game, but the online requirement has caused me numerous headaches in my time so far.

I paid nearly two hundred dollars for this with the understanding that I was paying towards something that would have an offline component. The lack of it is absolutely unacceptable to me, since it was advertised to have it. Offline is important to me, living in Australia with notoriously difficult internet. That two hundred dollars was a huge dent in my student budget that I invested because I believed in a modern elite game.

I would have already initiated a chargeback had this not been one of the last few purchases I made with a bank account that is now closed. My money's gone, so I'll just dissuade my friends that were interested in it from buying.

This is such an immense disappointment.
 
People have overreacted massively, and had a right tantrum in effect trying to punish FD by doing as much damage as possible.

The vindicative, destructive stupidity of this behavior boggles the mind. People are petty, nasty creatures and can't behave like civilized beings.
***
I wonder how many even realise that if Frontier put half a years's effort into creating a fully off-line mode for the game, that is half a year lost from actually putting in the features in the DDF into the main (online) game, and from working on the expansions.

Even those who are facing bad internet connections and such, do they think that situation will never recover. Do they think the world is going into a less-connected age, and they will forever be without reliable net access? A game that is planned to be developed over a decade should be worth embracing and supporting even if you are facing limited access in the immediate- or near future.

Such hateful, vindicative mob actions. Reminds me of the bloody gamergate idiocy.

Absolutely agree.
The extent to which some people have gone to discredit EVERYTHING FD has done because of this one shortcoming is disgusting.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom