I completely agree, but you know as well as I do that entire religions were formed around the idea of "I don't care what reality says, my perception is exactly the way of things."
For fidelity Roberts would definitely store everything. It's never been done before.
It was stored somewhere. You will find it in your dreams.ram. That has unlimited storage capacity.
It’s as fake today as it was at that Citizen Con(fidence trick) all those years ago, but the True Believers wilfully block that memory from resurfacing.
For what I know, tiles and the map/zone you land are different things.
"3. Squadron 42 is in over time mode. Developers are working hard, overtime in some instances, to shift towards an eventual release in the near (1-year) future." Development has been described as steady, but confidence in the final project is mixed. It's described as a very pretty game lacking in gameplay (when compared to Starfield). It will likely still release next year as we've previously mentioned."Oh my
I think the best word to describe Chris Roberts is irrational.
Comparing SF to SQ42 when SQ42 will be released. Yes, I know, SQ42 doesn't exist and the SQ42 tracker and newsletter report are just big lies, bla, bla.
Just before, Golgot posted a leak about a steady development on SQ42 with overtime...
I don't ask to compare the two now. I say if you want to compare SF to something from CIG, compare it to SQ42 which is at least almost in the same genre (solo space game) even if SQ42 is not a RPG. As SQ42 is not released yet, we can't and have to wait. Nothing more. If SF2 is out when SQ42 will be released, lets compare the two, you are correct.
Unusual of you to insist on the metacritic user score:You should look at the alternate reality of User score
I think also that the comparison should be with SQ42. Solo rpg and multi sim have not the same goals.
View attachment 367213
It is only stupid if you try to argue a ridiculous and extreme like for like as you suggest. Star Field can be compared to SC in plenty of respects they have in common: NPC AI, physics, gun play, first person interactions, loot, missions and quests, points of interest detail, landscape details, cities and outposts, space flight, planet generation, graphics detail and a large etc including overall performance, quality, stability, unit sales and review scores.
Just before, Golgot posted a leak about a steady development on SQ42 with overtime...
I'm lost, who should I believe
)Varonica says that SQ42 doesn't really exist, only in fake videos. You think the same ? Would you tell Varonica that you think that SQ42 is really developed since several years and an alpha version exist ?You missed out the bit where they feared it wouldn't compete well on the open market bud. IE all style, not enough substance.
Compared to Starfield in this case. (Although other games will be available
NPC, AI and physics have absolutely not the same constraints in a solo released and in a MMO alpha game. You cannot compare those points. At least wait for the beta, not the alpha that still need it"s main MMO components.
Ok for those
no, SC is not a RPG.
no, SF is post beta and launched (see, I try to avoid to use "released"), SC is an heavy alpha (and all major press companies know it and don't review it)
You can and you can also say that CIG is still working on it. Last year your list was longer and some elements of it have been delivered since. Next year, your list will be shorter. You think 10 years is too long, I think not.
SF is far superior if your trick your mind in believing SC is a solo RPG. But it's not. SF is not superior of inferior to SC because they are not in the same genre. It's like saying Witcher 3 is superior to WOW > stupid.
Why do you try to avoid using release? I'm curious.
