We know that one pack is coming and everything else we know nothingHey, I had to be away for a while. Anyone could update me on what's the current dlc situation?
We know that one pack is coming and everything else we know nothingHey, I had to be away for a while. Anyone could update me on what's the current dlc situation?
We basically know nothing. But there are hints that the DLC will probably not come in the usual DLC window, that is, before Easter. Steam database shows only the usual branches are updated, but not those that indicate DLC is near. All the focus is probably on the console edition and people speculate the DLC will come in May, once the console had its time to shine.Hey, I had to be away for a while. Anyone could update me on what's the current dlc situation?
It's like that animal game we did last week I think about your personal best and worst pack ideas. Everyone who really doesn't want to be disappointed should take that worst pack and give it the frontier treatment to show what is more likely to happen than a wonderful 12+ animal pack with an impressive free update.People are just circling through unrealistic expectations, pulling on straws, trying to define for them if theres a way that one last dlc could complete the game for them and in general people are not to happy with frontier despite what they promised
2 best by a long shot, good, predictable, rapping up in one year should be a reasonable taskThere are 3 possible ways for the future of the dlc support for the pc version and I think they are quite dependent on how well will the console version sell:
1. One last dlc till the end of May, I don’t expect anything special just a regular dlc 4+1 or animal pack 7+1. DLC would be available multi-platform.
2. New DLC’s will come out regularly as usual until the March-May 2025 when the support for console will end and the financial year on May 2025.
3. Frontier will change the format of the dlc and will introduce us to something totally new.
Which outcome would be the most interesting for you?
There is a lot I think a free update could bring, but I would rather them work on more animals than a free update at this point.It's like that animal game we did last week I think about your personal best and worst pack ideas. Everyone who really doesn't want to be disappointed should take that worst pack and give it the frontier treatment to show what is more likely to happen than a wonderful 12+ animal pack with an impressive free update.
Easily #2 is the best outcome by far. I would love one more year of support. Bring us to the 5th anniversary and show console players what’s to come! Also it’s weird to have a season pass, then just do one season? I feel like if things go well they might put future dlc on a new season pass.There are 3 possible ways for the future of the dlc support for the pc version and I think they are quite dependent on how well will the console version sell:
1. One last dlc till the end of May, I don’t expect anything special just a regular dlc 4+1 or animal pack 7+1. DLC would be available multi-platform.
2. New DLC’s will come out regularly as usual until the March-May 2025 when the support for console will end and the financial year on May 2025.
3. Frontier will change the format of the dlc and will introduce us to something totally new.
Which outcome would be the most interesting for you?
It can still be seen on the YouTube feed. But yes, the link doesn't workHmmm... I wonder why todays twitter post got deleted. It lead to a beginners guide but the beginners guide link also leads to a 404 error.
A total stretch, but if that happens at EA there is always a mini leak in there.
Suspicious…Hmmm... I wonder why todays twitter post got deleted. It lead to a beginners guide but the beginners guide link also leads to a 404 error.
A total stretch, but if that happens at EA there is always a mini leak in there.
Can I combine 2 and 3? Not that I think it's realistic, but I'd rather have 2 bigger multi-platform releases after a regular DLC now, maybe introducing aviaries and birds and monkeys and then an exhibit overhaul with moving mammals and a few fish and different exhibit sizes, then 5-6 "business as usual" packs at this point.There are 3 possible ways for the future of the dlc support for the pc version and I think they are quite dependent on how well will the console version sell:
1. One last dlc till the end of May, I don’t expect anything special just a regular dlc 4+1 or animal pack 7+1. DLC would be available multi-platform.
2. New DLC’s will come out regularly as usual until the March-May 2025 when the support for console will end and the financial year on May 2025.
3. Frontier will change the format of the dlc and will introduce us to something totally new.
Which outcome would be the most interesting for you?
The first 1.16 update patch notes was released a week early on YouTube and was deleted, nothing too out of the ordinary.Suspicious…
Llamas leaked !!!!It can still be seen on the YouTube feed. But yes, the link doesn't work
View attachment 387852
That survey was....weird
Nothing important was said in there, the questions regarding the game where way to generic and unspecific or just kinda dumb for example do you like building a zoo in a zoo game? No no totally not
Is management important to you?
Well yes it would be, its my favorite video game genre but planet zoo is only a management game in its steam tags.
What was i suppoused to answer there?
Yes its very important to me but i literally do not interact with any "management" feature because most of them arnt management but tedium.
What do you buy new packs for?
Actually lists scenarios as an exclusive answer next to animals and scenery, as if anyone is gonna pick that.
Most of the survey would have benefitted alot from being able to assign numbers or having a text box to write in additional context, as rn the only informations that frontier got that arnt just the most generic and obvious stuff like that i think that animal variety is in fact very important in a zoo game (take notes frontier) is my personal information, that im a young addult from germany who enjoys mamagement and strategy games, aswell as league of legends.
It felt much more like they are trying to asses their audience range instead of actually trying to gather meaningfull feedback about their game
Most ideal? Probably #2.There are 3 possible ways for the future of the dlc support for the pc version and I think they are quite dependent on how well will the console version sell:
1. One last dlc till the end of May, I don’t expect anything special just a regular dlc 4+1 or animal pack 7+1. DLC would be available multi-platform.
2. New DLC’s will come out regularly as usual until the March-May 2025 when the support for console will end and the financial year on May 2025.
3. Frontier will change the format of the dlc and will introduce us to something totally new.
Which outcome would be the most interesting for you?
I like number 3 the best, the format for dlcs over the last year has been rather predictable.There are 3 possible ways for the future of the dlc support for the pc version and I think they are quite dependent on how well will the console version sell:
1. One last dlc till the end of May, I don’t expect anything special just a regular dlc 4+1 or animal pack 7+1. DLC would be available multi-platform.
2. New DLC’s will come out regularly as usual until the March-May 2025 when the support for console will end and the financial year on May 2025.
3. Frontier will change the format of the dlc and will introduce us to something totally new.
Which outcome would be the most interesting for you?
Trap option.2. New DLC’s will come out regularly as usual until the March-May 2025 when the support for console will end and the financial year on May 2025.
Most ideal? Probably #2.
Most interesting? Definitely #3. I’ve felt the pack format’s been a bit limiting for a while now. Switching it up would be nice!
Honestly some new formats would be nice, obviously larger expansions would be great. I always thought mini packs would be very nice though.I like number 3 the best, the format for dlcs over the last year has been rather predictable.
I think people do tend to forget that making DLCs also costs money and that financially a port to console alone is a safer financial ROI than making new DLCs is. You need both less people to do a port and fewer types of dev profiles than you need to make new DLCs.It would be strange that they make all this extra money from the console release but only put out 1 more pack, I would think of the console port as a boost to keep going,