Yep, the new Dune is probably slightly better than the 84 film but both films had parts that were better than the other.
I got all the dune movies and the tv show’s fan much? And I agree the new version is excellent, maybe 1 out of 10 reboots are better than the original, however sometimes it’s better to not reboot it and instead make a movie that is like a branch of the original.Both the 1984 film and 2000 miniseries did Dune well with the former (although flawed) doing concepts much better. For example Lynch visualized Guild travel in a visually rich way that was epic in the cinema, and dealt with the more mystical dream aspects far more effectively than Villeneuve. When not over-acting, the Baron too was much more menacing and Dr Yuehs motivations made sense- not to mention the Emperor acted like an emperor. And the set / costume design were epic.
Its a pity that the Spicediver mega edit of 1984 Dune was not the cinematic version because it really makes the film shine- but then in 1984 film lengths were much more constrained.
You should make a new thread for that. The discussion would be better than this one.I read reboots as robots.
So the thread's been a bit of a disappointment for me.
As you were. I'm off to specsavers.
Wokism is a problem when it gets in the way of telling a story in a logical way, or tries to see things though a very puritanical lens.I've no problem with reboots or even perceived "wokism" as the culture has changed since my youth in the 80s and modern films should and do reflect that.
We're very at risk of being old men who are shouting at clouds - pre-kids I was at the cinema at least once a week seeing new often fantastic new films.
There's no reason to think that great films aren't being made now - my exposure to them is just also so much less.
It's tempting to think everything was better in the good old days, but there were some truly dreadful films being made back then too, it wasn't back to back classics by any means.
Not that the running man was a good movie, but why do we need a new version?Just to throw some wood on the fire
![]()
Glen Powell to Star in Edgar Wright’s Stephen King Movie ‘The Running Man’ for Paramount
'Top Gun: Maverick' breakout Glen Powell will star in Edgar Wright's remake of 'The Running Man'variety.com
Due to a long standing contract with a Great Old One, Stephen King movies have to be remade regularly or it will eat the world.Not that the running man was a good movie, but why do we need a new version?
Yeah, let's do a reboot of The ShiningDue to a long standing contract with a Great Old One, Stephen King movies have to be remade regularly or it will eat the world.
Was already done in 1997 as a mini-series. The Great Old One was pleased.Yeah, let's do a reboot of The Shining![]()
Never watched it, and not going to, the first one was a masterpiece.Was already done in 1997 as a mini-series. The Great Old One was pleased.![]()
Have you ever read the original story by Stephen King/Richard Bachman? I’ll be interested to see if the new film follows the novella or goes down the route of the Arnie film (take the names & title and the general premise).Not that the running man was a good movie, but why do we need a new version?
No I haven't and that's a good thing, some of the movies I watched where I read the books was soooo disappointing.Have you ever read the original story by Stephen King/Richard Bachman? I’ll be interested to see if the new film follows the novella or goes down the route of the Arnie film (take the names & title and the general premise).
I read the original novella before watching the Arnie film and was confused as to why they shared the same nameNo I haven't and that's a good thing, some of the movies I watched where I read the books was soooo disappointing.