No Single Player Offline Mode then? [Part 2]

Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
on the other hand, it shows how emotionaly invested some people are to your game.

threatening an EMPLOYEE over a COMPANY DECISION, is well... poor and making me sad :(

- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -




then you perfectly eligible for a refund if i understand michael right.

Not as I understand it because I signed up at KS stage when I should have "invested more wisely and considered the risks".
 
then you perfectly eligible for a refund if i understand michael right.[/QUOTE]

I do not believe so - if you pre-ordered the retail game you can get a refund but a kickstart pledge is just a contribution to a future project.
 
It is unfortunate that this circular discussion continues. Those offended should speak with a lawyer, because complaining here won't change any minds. My impression that some are drumming up the same arguments simply for the amusement of instigating others. Judging by the amount of comments and exponential number views for this topic alone, sadly I may be right.
 

Antigonos

Banned
then you perfectly eligible for a refund if i understand michael right.

I do not believe so - if you pre-ordered the retail game you can get a refund but a kickstart pledge is just a contribution to a future project.

i see, kickstarter may have different legal lines, agree.
 
Is this not Dave Braben describing the product as having an offline single player mode? I think it is.

View attachment 1940

Therefore does UK consumer law then entitle us to a refund? Yes

Not a student of the law, but I am fairly certain that this reddit AMA from a year ago in which Braben is outlining a planned feature during development that eventually couldn't work out wouldn't count as evidence. I hate to be that guy, but seriously, buyer beware. Next time, don't back KS projects, or buy early access software.

That being said, I do hope this gets resolved to a point where everyone is satisfied. No one wants anyone to lose out, and offline certainly would have been a nice option. That being said, some people are going way overboard with the complaints. No one lied, software development is not as simple as flipping a switch, and sometimes plans and hopes can't make it to reality.

For those who have not played or downloaded, of course, no question, you deserve a refund. But for those that have sunk hours into a the Beta, the loss of this one feature is not enough to justify a refund for a product you have been using for months now especially since the KS promise of a new Elite will soon be fulfilled.
 
Mr. Brookes, just out of curiosity,

are their numbers on how many backers applied for a refund because of the dropped offline, that you are allowed to tell?
 
So, you got a screenshot that was taken during beta testing development and things had to change. What of it? Does U.K law cover matierial that is in the development phase and subject to change, or is this for the 'finished' product that is deemed worthy for consumption of the general public.

Shok.

no, he's got a screenshot, of david braben directly answering a specific question, during the kickstarter campaign at that time there was no beta!
 
Last edited:
You are kidding, aren't you?

I imagine he is not. Have you been reading the way FD and it's employees have been de-humanized in these posts? The way they are being slowly built up to be devious, lying, money-hungry and disrespectful?

These comments are coming from people who don't understand there are human beings being affected and hurt at the other end of their communications.
 
Status
Thread Closed: Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom