ship interiors - will they happen

I think you're referring to something Arthur said in a livestream, I believe when they were first demoing a ground mission before the release of Odyssey. I'll see if I can find it, but it is a very real thing that happened.
If you mean this:
That is very different, and unfortunately not about the thing I was asking about. There were only - "There are no plans for Ship Interiors", also no Zero-G space walks - in that stream. Nothing else was said.
 
I think you're referring to something Arthur said in a livestream, I believe when they were first demoing a ground mission before the release of Odyssey. I'll see if I can find it, but it is a very real thing that happened.
I was watching this livestream. There was a lot of drama after he said that. Pretty sure that stream is deleted now and can't be found. Honestly to me it felt like an off-the-cuff comment he made that wasn't necessarily FDev's official stance on the issue.

My understanding is the last "official" stance on ship interiors was: we have no plans for it, but if people really want it we will re-evaluate that.
 
LOL. Answer the question.

Evaluating the game engine's source code is the only way to determine how hard something is to implement.

Do you agree or disagree?
 
Quite old, yes.
But obviously, still as important as ever,
and if you claim the opposit, there is 113 pages worth of fuss here alone to prove the contra
so

View attachment 423346
Before Odyssey
Before Fleet Carriers
Before Beyond
Before Horizons
Before base game launch.

This is what we're going back to? A one liner when the game was still a blank canvas and a bunch of ideas?

Just found my popcorn, do continue.
 
I was watching this livestream. There was a lot of drama after he said that. Pretty sure that stream is deleted now and can't be found. Honestly to me it felt like an off-the-cuff comment he made that wasn't necessarily FDev's official stance on the issue.

My understanding is the last "official" stance on ship interiors was: we have no plans for it, but if people really want it we will re-evaluate that.
I thimk you're right, but theres also a video from a disgruntled content creator which has clips of the various times Arthur said these things, I think this clip might be the one I was thinking of. And I think maybe the one Coolgroove is referring to.

Source: https://youtu.be/qVqUwkhT4Dc?si=1JGTzovwW7iZBbf_&t=666
 
This is what we're going back to? A one liner when the game was still a blank canvas and a bunch of ideas?
Yes, because that is called backbone.
To stick to what you say.
ESPECIALLY if potentially MILLIONS of players would care about it :D
(Depending on how you define "playerbase" ofc ;))
 
To be clear, that was a complilation by a content creator, but the clip was from the days the CMs would do streams with members of the streaming community and answer questions. In that specific case, an interview with Lave Radio.
 
You can dream and speculate yourself all you want for all I care. "Not at launch" is a meaningless corporate phrase, and the last thing it means is "feature X is planned".
There is absolutely no reason for a developer to mention a feature if they weren't looking to implement it. These are official statements, not just us talking here. But you can interpret it anyway to want for all I care.
 
Back
Top Bottom