The one with no stars is real, since in free space, you cannot see them.
Shok.
Does everyone have to be such a grumpy guts and just not accept that ED creates very nice space shots - very similar to real ones (with artistic license)
Geezo
The one with no stars is real, since in free space, you cannot see them.
Shok.
The one with no stars is real, since in free space, you cannot see them.
Shok.
You can if your windshield augments it's opacity in various areas in order to allow you to view them. In elite, Windshields are smart, can vary and alter wavelengths passing through them. This is how you don't cook near the sun, but instead see it in detail.
Windshield... it's not really a windshield in space though is it...
You can if your windshield augments it's opacity in various areas in order to allow you to view them. In elite, Windshields are smart, can vary and alter wavelengths passing through them. This is how you don't cook near the sun, but instead see it in detail.
Windshield... it's not really a windshield in space though is it...
The one with no stars is real, since in free space, you cannot see them.
Shok.
What happens when your canopy gets blown when you're near a star?
The one with no stars is real, since in free space, you cannot see them.
I'll take your nasa link and raise you a Patrick Moore interview with Neil Armstrong...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtdcdxvNI1o
Patrick Moore asked Neil Armstrong this question twice - the first time was at a press conference shortly after Apollo 11. I know of a researcher in California who got the same answer from nasa pr in the 70s.