This thread is not related to profits or making money like some other threads, this is about over-saturation and the background simulation.
I respectfully ask that you refrain from posting just to state how easy you can make money, Thanks.
Tonight I went to a random system and recorded the following information which highlights a few issues surrounding trading in the current release version of Elite Dangerous. I did not look hard for this, it is still the case in numerous systems.
I visited a system named PULARUNGU, an industrial system with a population of 4.4 million.
This system contains a station Berezin Enterprise and outpost Cixin Ring.
I noticed the error I had previously posted about whereby the system imports Liquor yet has a High Supply, in both stations.
Berezin:
Cixin:
So, both stations have a HIGH supply of Liquor and a 0 LOW demand, they also show as importing this from Wakawal.
The galaxy map shows a trade route from Wakawal to Pularungu for Liquor.
So, I travelled to Wakawal an Agricultural/Industrial Economy and visited each station, it has three, only one of which is the supplier (supposedly).
Olsen Terminal: (Agri - supplier)
Virts Gateway: (industrial)
Good Ring: (industrial)
Ok, so now the fun part... I apologise if I have missed anything or mis-calculated anything here (it is 3am after all)
The exporter - Olsen had MEDIUM supply.
The importer - Berezin and Cixin had HIGH supply
Buy from Olsen (The exporters) @ 535 cr per tonne
* Sell to Berezin or Cixin (where they export to) @ 455cr per tonne = 80cr loss per tonne.
* Sell to Virts: 666cr = 131cr profit per tonne.
* Sell to Good: 661cr = 126cr profit per tonne.
Buy from Berezin or Cixin (The importers) @ 475cr per tonne
* Sell to Olsen: 508cr = 33cr profit per tonne.
* Sell to Virts: 666cr = 191cr profit per tonne.
* Sell to Good: 661cr = 186cr profit per tonne.
1) Trading from supplier to consumer in a different system (following trade route - agricultural to industrial)
LOSS: 80cr per tonne
2) Trading from supplier to consumer in the same system (normal - agricultural to industrial)
PROFIT: 131cr per tonne
3) Trading from consumer to supplier (backwards industrial to agricultural)
PROFIT: 33cr per tonne.
4) Trading from consumer to consumer (industrial to industrial)
PROFIT: 191cr per tonne
Surely (1) should be more profitable than (3) or (4) in fact (3) and (4) should not exist IMO.
(2) is the only route which actually makes sense, but less profit than the alternative (4)
Here is the traffic report for one system, just for reference:
I hope this gets fixed...this is not the only system or commodity like this.
I respectfully ask that you refrain from posting just to state how easy you can make money, Thanks.
Tonight I went to a random system and recorded the following information which highlights a few issues surrounding trading in the current release version of Elite Dangerous. I did not look hard for this, it is still the case in numerous systems.
I visited a system named PULARUNGU, an industrial system with a population of 4.4 million.
This system contains a station Berezin Enterprise and outpost Cixin Ring.
I noticed the error I had previously posted about whereby the system imports Liquor yet has a High Supply, in both stations.
Berezin:

Cixin:

So, both stations have a HIGH supply of Liquor and a 0 LOW demand, they also show as importing this from Wakawal.
The galaxy map shows a trade route from Wakawal to Pularungu for Liquor.
So, I travelled to Wakawal an Agricultural/Industrial Economy and visited each station, it has three, only one of which is the supplier (supposedly).
Olsen Terminal: (Agri - supplier)

Virts Gateway: (industrial)

Good Ring: (industrial)

Ok, so now the fun part... I apologise if I have missed anything or mis-calculated anything here (it is 3am after all)
The exporter - Olsen had MEDIUM supply.
The importer - Berezin and Cixin had HIGH supply
Buy from Olsen (The exporters) @ 535 cr per tonne
* Sell to Berezin or Cixin (where they export to) @ 455cr per tonne = 80cr loss per tonne.
* Sell to Virts: 666cr = 131cr profit per tonne.
* Sell to Good: 661cr = 126cr profit per tonne.
Buy from Berezin or Cixin (The importers) @ 475cr per tonne
* Sell to Olsen: 508cr = 33cr profit per tonne.
* Sell to Virts: 666cr = 191cr profit per tonne.
* Sell to Good: 661cr = 186cr profit per tonne.
1) Trading from supplier to consumer in a different system (following trade route - agricultural to industrial)
LOSS: 80cr per tonne
2) Trading from supplier to consumer in the same system (normal - agricultural to industrial)
PROFIT: 131cr per tonne
3) Trading from consumer to supplier (backwards industrial to agricultural)
PROFIT: 33cr per tonne.
4) Trading from consumer to consumer (industrial to industrial)
PROFIT: 191cr per tonne
Surely (1) should be more profitable than (3) or (4) in fact (3) and (4) should not exist IMO.
(2) is the only route which actually makes sense, but less profit than the alternative (4)
Here is the traffic report for one system, just for reference:

I hope this gets fixed...this is not the only system or commodity like this.
Last edited: