Python with backing lights and says like a lorry in reverse... can see the fun in that![]()
So can I, especially so if you "accidentally" reverse over some pesky pirate, "oh sorry, did I feel a speed bump there?"
Python with backing lights and says like a lorry in reverse... can see the fun in that![]()
Python with backing lights and says like a lorry in reverse... can see the fun in that![]()
<nods> A ship without running-lights would attract attention (and you should be able to disable them as needed).Would be nice to see the more heavily policed or populated systems fine you for not deploying them when in the vicinity of the station as it's a safety hazard.
+1 for strobes on the ships like today's aircraft, and +1 for being able to turn them on/off at will (or at least with 'landing gear' - which for space could simply be the lights, and in atmosphere would include undercarriage).
Would be nice to see the more heavily policed or populated systems fine you for not deploying them when in the vicinity of the station as it's a safety hazard.
Not really fussed about realism, I just think it would look good![]()
I don't know think of the ultra safe systems with Viper Cops with speed guns hiding behind asteroids and traffic lights at space lane intersections.
And lets not forget space station parking fees or park and ride systems!
I agree in part. I think it would be an atmospheric addition to the game, but I'm not sold on the idea of it being a finable offense of you don't turn them on. That's a bit too simmy, if you take my meaning. It's not like MS Flight Simulator. Still, I suppose we *do* get fined for weapon discharges near stations, so it's not unsupported.
Do you also want to be permanently blinded by a laser glancing your cockpit?
I don't think cockpit windows should be vulnerable to this sort of thing, that would make them seem an even dafter idea than they already do.