Python, fuel bill INSANE!!

Yeah, on my T9 I have a choice between a 350,000 credit fuel bill, or 3 minutes sitting at 30km/s by a star.. Pretty simple choice to me

Depending on your trade route, it can be more profitable to scoop or to trade a few more units. Overall, $$$ / hour remains the only important data.
 
@OP - you might want to steer well clear of the Type-9 then.......If the Python fuel bill irks you then the Hippo's fuel bill will send you straight to the ER!
 
Depending on your trade route, it can be more profitable to scoop or to trade a few more units. Overall, $$$ / hour remains the only important data.

Yep, definitely depends on the route, which I why I said 'simple maths' calculate fuel cost vs loss of cargo
 
Last edited:
Fuel scooping is just so worth it.
I would propose that it shouldn't be. Fuel scoops should be for going out in the wild where the outposts aren't. They should be for explorers willing to risk a close dance with the sun to keep going into the Void. They shouldn't be for a staid trader in a space cow to add a few points to his profit margin. The fuel scoop is currently the most profitable thing you can do in the game if you're in an expensive ship; that's just weird.

IMO, it's a HUGE hole in the lore of the game when something that can be gathered so easily - the most abundant element in the universe - is so expensive. They should be handling the cost of ownership scaling more intelligently. Wear&tear, or how about docking fees? Sidewinders dock for free, and everything else has to pay a docking fee that scales up with the ship.
 
*sigh* Guess I'm going to have to invest in a fuel scoop, no grade A scoops where I'm located so I'm going to have to shell out on more fuel to look for one....
 
Except that FD made the mistake of explicitly calibrating fuel tanks in Tons. A Ton of hydrogen should be a Ton of hydrogen, no matter what ship it goes into. This is nothing but a sloppy/lazy way to shoehorn higher costs into the higher-tier ships. The sad thing is that it's completely unnecessary. The same effect could be had simply by raising wear&tear costs while keeping fuel on a linear scale.

I don't guess I've ever paid attention to how much fuel I'm buying, just the credit amount. Wouldn't a ton of hydrogen get a viper much farther than it would a python?
 
Except that FD made the mistake of explicitly calibrating fuel tanks in Tons. A Ton of hydrogen should be a Ton of hydrogen, no matter what ship it goes into. This is nothing but a sloppy/lazy way to shoehorn higher costs into the higher-tier ships. The sad thing is that it's completely unnecessary. The same effect could be had simply by raising wear&tear costs while keeping fuel on a linear scale.

I am missing something here George. If the larger ship uses more tons of fuel, then it would cost more to fill 'er up eh?
 
I don't guess I've ever paid attention to how much fuel I'm buying, just the credit amount. Wouldn't a ton of hydrogen get a viper much farther than it would a python?
I don't know, but that's not really relevant. The size of the fuel tank is in tons. The Adder has an 8T tank. You can put the same tank in a T9 and filling it will cost MUCH more.
 
By the time you have a python you should already know about how huge fuel bill can be, for instance the cobra. From there on it's time for a fuel scoop if you plan on making a lot of jumps.
 
Yeah, a whopping great 120 seconds to fill to the my standard 75%.. T9 makes me 1.1 million per run on my route, takes 9 minutes, 11 minutes when I scoop on the second run. Am not in any hurry dude.

If I didn't scoop I would pay 150,000 credits every two runs, that's the cost of a Cobra every 20 minutes, rather keep the money thanks :)

I just do a quick descent at full throttle on every scoopable sun whilst aligning with the next waypoint - the scoop rate easily goes up to half a ton/s and it doesn't really cost me much time that way.

As for cargo space - of course it depends on the route, but I personally don't min/max - so I just do what I feel up to and fitted it as a comfortable allrounder accordingly. A class 5 scoop on a Python certainly is a bit of overkill and a smaller one would be superior from a profit/h POV, but I primarily fly ships to enjoy them and I don't enjoy waiting for my fuel tank to fill up, so it's just personal preference.

On a side note I downgraded my fuel tank to 16 tons so it doesn't get too heavy if I'd accidentally end up scooping to much.
 
Last edited:
You may have saved a bunch of cash, but i bet your trade route took longer. Fairly certain the longer trip isn't worth the fuel scoop.

All these are just assumptions and vain conversation. It depends on the piloting skills how much the trade route takes time, for example, how many times you overshoot the station etc. But if someone wants to be sure whether or not the fuels scoop is "advisable" in theory, just do the calculations. It is simple. I won't bother, because I feel it intuitively that with my playstyle the scoop is absolutely essential (I don't want to be stuck with my Python in a place where there are no stations nor outposts for refuel). And even when on short routes, if I can save some 10k cr with a fuel scoop (C5) I would still need at least 1250cr profit per tonne in order to make that C5-scoop useless and unproductive. That is quite rare profit per tonne for short routes.

-v
 
Except that FD made the mistake of explicitly calibrating fuel tanks in Tons. A Ton of hydrogen should be a Ton of hydrogen, no matter what ship it goes into. This is nothing but a sloppy/lazy way to shoehorn higher costs into the higher-tier ships. The sad thing is that it's completely unnecessary. The same effect could be had simply by raising wear&tear costs while keeping fuel on a linear scale.

BINGO

How funny is this actually. Just another massive "fake" balancing act.... gg frontier
 
In all the time I've flown a Python - I never ran it without a Class 4A or 4B Fuel Scoop...

It's just a high-octane beast. And being what it is... it eats fuel for breakfast.
But of course you get alot of performance for that, so it's something everybody has to live with...

Running it without a suitably sized Fuel Scoop is a seriously bad idea under most normal conditions...

Everyone keeps saying variations of this, but it's just not relevant. We're not talking about how fast a given ship uses fuel, but the cost to refil it. The T7 has the same size fuel tank as the Python. Which do you think costs more? Why?
 
Back
Top Bottom