You are kidding right? £145.50 a year for half a dozen BBC channels that show nothing but utter crap is a complete rip off. I can watch lots of stuff online legally without ever needing to pay for a TV licence. I declared I had no TV at my address, and a TV Licence inspector paid me a visit.
I can also watch BBC programmes legally on iPlayer as long as I am not watching anything as it is being broadcast.
p.s. Adblock is great.
Well, it depends upon how you view what the now badly named 'TV' license provides. It is not just television but radio, web and other projects.
e.g.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-24446046
Of course the quality of content is subjective, personally I watch very little TV, almost none of it at time of broadcast so in theory I could not pay by dropping those rare instances.
However, I do listen to the radio, I use their web pages, I access their programming via iPlayer. It also provides services that I don't use but are used by others that would struggle in a commercial environment. I think it is only fair that I contribute.
As you have said though, if you are not interested in their services you can opt out.
Sky charges anywhere between £30 and £80 a month probably for their output and they still pump out adverts at every opportunity, so in that context I think it is a fair price.