The first photos of Pluto are upon us..!
SO far, this constitutes the best photo we have of Pluto, taken from Hubble. The New Horizon images will only get better.
View attachment 13239
I have to ask. I am not a telescope type person but if Hubble can see "billions and billions" of stars at great distances why is it that it takes a murky looking puddle picture of a planet in our own system?![]()
I have to ask. I am not a telescope type person but if Hubble can see "billions and billions" of stars at great distances why is it that it takes a murky looking puddle picture of a planet in our own system?![]()
Because it's bloody hard![]()
I think it's similar to taking a high power scope and staring at your feet. It's meant to see far, not up close, and on a galactic scale, Pluto is basically right in front of us.
Pluto is almost 40x the distance from the Sun as is Earth. It's also at least half the size of our moon. It is incredibly far and seeing it from Earth (or even Hubble) has been compared to seeing a matchstick in Los Angeles from New York. Stars, by comparison - even very distant ones) generate many, many orders of magnitudes more light than Pluto.
View attachment 13240
I thought at one time they were not going to even call Pluto a planet because of the small size. Was that going to happen?
Do you even astronomy?
|
Pluto is officially a dwarf planet, a sub-category of interstellar objects among those that form a mostly round shape under the influence of their own gravity.
Pluto was considered a planet until 2006. It's been demoted for numerous reasons. It's now called a dwarf planet, along with many others that inhabit a region called the Kuiper Belt.
[video]http://ia600601.us.archive.org/28/items/guidetospace/WhyPlutoIsNotAPlanet.mp4[/video]
Thanks for asking. I random Astronomy if that helps. I just figured I would ask a sincere question. I appreciate your comment though. I guess next time instead of actively enjoying the discussion on here I will simply Google it!