You need to accept it traders (and premier), simples.
I am NOT sorry that you dont have GOD mode.
Play SOLO for GOD mode.
I am NOT sorry that you dont have GOD mode.
Play SOLO for GOD mode.
Last edited:
Pls refer to this post ^^^
You are missing the point OP. Pirating is NOT possible right now because of the trader HAXS to get away. Traders got a TON of money, they should not grumble as much as they do to feed the food chain, pirates cannot even make a LIVING right now, what is so hard to understand that?
And for all the traders saying ''oh well I will cower off to solo'', then see ya, dont let the door hit you on the way out. If you want immunity from piracy then what is the difference if you leave to solo? I dont care ... BYE!
We will wait until either the 'hardcore traders' stay in or come to open (which they will) or ED balanced it so the 'pitiful' traders dont have a choice anymore other than to go or accept fairness! (and not let the door hit them on the way out).
Trading is so profitable right now, the most profitable thing you can do in the game!!! Why do you think that is? Its so the money can run down the line! Trader > Pirate> Bouty hunter. Grow some.
Your picture makes you look cool Gogster, like you are flying a space ship!
Its authentic because its black and white.
Looks like you headbutted a wall that had wet paint.
<snip>
This doesn't exist in ED - all systems seems to be the same, no trader can hire an escort and do their are no safe trade routes.
<snip>
Dont play Console like the WII sorry, thats for non-hardcore. Like Traders QQ'ing, they could sort out drought in the 3rd world contries with their tears.
You grasp at straws my friend. Certain honest traders have agreed that this is a 'fool proof way' of QQing. Even ED said it was not intended. It will go away soon, and hopfully all of the QQers will too.
Then, we will have a good game. And we will have to build more wells.
- - - - - Additional Content Posted / Auto Merge - - - - -
As is trying to 'win one over' by quoting a post which I edited 2 seconds later.
I've heard terps removes paint well.
LOL......you STILL don't get it.......you will have an EMPTY game.......you will be left with nothing to hunt but NPCs......pew pew....pew pew pew.........lol....![]()
I hate to be a pedant.
But i guess you mean adapt?
or else your own title says traders ARE very skilled at asymmetric game play.
[h=2][/h]
I didn't say that, anyway you asked:
So aside from the errors in your post, you're using asymmetric to excuse imbalance.
I've stated this before and i state it again... Compare to the real world: Is it common for people driving trucks to be shot in the face and killed and get their cargo stolen? Does this happen once every minute on international highways? No. So why should it happen in civilized systems in ED? I would think that in the future, civilized systems would definitely fight this behaviour.
This is what needs to happen. Being a pirate and murderer should mean that you are shunned by the community, disallowed to dock in ANY civilized system and subject to constant harrassment by powerful AI agencies trying to blow you up. Being a pirate should basically be a choice to stand outside of society and civilized life, and be part of underground activity. So in ED terms, you should be banned in all non-anarchy systems.
This is realistic, while not nerfing the pirates in any way other than revoking their ability to be accepted citizens.
I agree. The things I'm saying right now, do you honestly belive that I dont relise other things that need to happen too?
The whole thing needs balanced, and I think, on your point, that once a pirate always a pirate. Pirates should not be able to change their minds easily once they have trodden the path. I simply think that the first thing that needs to happen BEFORE BALANCING EVERYTHING ELSE, is that traders should relise they make a TON of money, and should stop believeing that nothing bad should ever happen to them.
No worries - it must be tough posting in a second language,I only pointed out Adept as it was pretty central to your argument and thought you could edit your title.
![]()