Did you agree to in-game advertising?

Did you agree to in-game advertising?

  • Yes

    Votes: 320 61.3%
  • No

    Votes: 202 38.7%

  • Total voters
    522
  • Poll closed .
Gee, don't take me literally. Calm down!

We only have the words of you posts to go with, and you were talking about your 'feelings' hardly something a thrid party is qualified to make judgement calls on, on if you are exagerating.
Did you mean you were figuratively having feelings?
Stop using exagerations then.
 
Last edited:

ffr

Banned
I have already paid them to make the game. I have already paid them to make the expansions. It is their fault if they cannot afford the overhead of running it. Perhaps they shouldn't have ditched Offline Mode.

Prior to offline mode removal, the EULA included this:

"Where a Game incorporates dynamic advertising technology, the technology which serves the provision of dynamic in-game advertising is integrated within the Game. This means that if you do not want to receive dynamic advertising, you should only play the game when you are not connected to the Internet. "
 
Wrong on every possible level. This is a give away sponsored by Nvidia but orchestrated and run by FD that doesn't price anything out or ask you to purchase anything or ask you to go to a site (or list the site) or requires you to go out of the game to do anything. It's a community event that takes place completely in-game that has a real world prize and what allows them to offer that prize is that they mention the name of the sponsor.

The only thing that differentiates this from a normal community event is that the reward actually has value, you can't cheat to win, and they mentioned the name of a company in-game that exists out-of-game. If that brings forth your fury then so would the 50 other instances of referencing current day real names in-game and it's obvious it doesn't or there would be a thread about npc names, a thread about station names a thread about system names etc.

forum flame baiting is all this thread is. Come back when there's an actual instance of in-game advertisement rather than just the mention of a name and a give-away that benefits players and requires nothing but in-game activities to win.

It's not an advertisement? Everything you said in the first paragraph is right, but I don't understand what that has to do with it not being an advertisement.
They don't ask us to purchase anything. They don't ask us to go to a site and they don't list it (for all those interested in the mythical home of the NVidia corporation, it's nvidia.com) it takes places in-game and they mention the name of the spnsor - the one that offers FD money to mention them, because FD is using their game to advertise the NVidia corporation. Advertisement!

The only thing that... no, here's another thing that differentiates it from other community events: It's all centred around advertising the NVidia corporation. That does bring forth my fury (no not really, but I do find it a it sucky) because it is in-game advertising, unlike other instances of mentioning real names in-game which are not in-game advertising. I am sure you have noticed that the reaosn I don't quite like this event is that it contains in-game advertising, which I do not like.

I would claim that this is an actual instance of in-game advertisement. Or did it stop being an advertisement? Was it all a fluke? Now it's no longer an advertisement! Poof!
Also, I don't technically think this can be called a give-away, since that would involve FD freely handing out these graphics cards. But that's another matter.
 
We got one who doesnt know what all the fuss is about, another thinks this thread is stupid, someone tells another ones opinion is wrong on so many levels and a cable guy justifying adverts because hes a cable guy. Oh heck Im gonna run some rares through the Lave blockade.
 
"Do your mother a favour:
Buy a Lance & Ferman Military Laser!"

The nVidia thing is naff (though I wouldn't say no to one, so I've got half an eye open just on the off-chance of running into one before the power-gaming loons), but kinda funny given that AMD are up to the same tricks in Star Citizen.
 
everyone agreed to it. You agreed to the eula and it's in there. This thread is stupid.

It is actually not in there anymore, so maybe it is not the thread...

As far as i'm concerned FD/Sir Braben can go full scrooge mcduck for the cash ;) - the original Elite stole most my childhood and made life on this miserable planet a bajillion times more interesting.

He went full mcscrooge long ago on the cocreator of your beloved childhood memories, is that ok with you,too?
 
Cant say it would bother me - Unless a station was painted with the Cillit Bang colours and had a big picture of Barry Scott on it....in that case....Meh.
 
No advertising for me. But I agree with the fictional advertising, if it is the trademarks, invented in the game. And with moderation
 
Last edited:
FD sold this game as a pay-once deal. No pay-to-play model. This will have been a factor for many players when deciding to purchase ED. Eventually upkeep costs will start to bite for FD, so if some in-game advertising helps keep the universe together - fine with me.
 
I voted yes, because i haven't read the EULA before agreeing. I don't even know if the EULA is relevant here...

Even if the poll would say "Do you agree" i would vote yes. I am certainly willing to pay that price for continous updates without subsciption fee as long as it is immersively injected like the nvidia competition.
 
If it ever forced on me to wait for or to watch adverts like 'Please view these messages while we connect you to starport services' type nonsense then I'll log off permanently.

If it's on billboards that I can glance at then ignore (just like the real life ones) then go for it as far as I'm concerned.
 
Couldn't care less whether there is in-game (real) advertising. It won't affect my game in the slightest.

Would prefer if it was tailored for ED (ie in context).
 
If done in game (station signage, Galnet) and in lore I would not mind at all.

If it turns ED into a free Android app with banners everwhere then no. But FD are not that crass, and all the fuss over the Nvidia cards is just hot air. What better way for a comp then a treasure hunt?
 
I was a big fan of the Wip3out series on Playstation, going back to the original on the PS1. When Wipeout XL came out, it was "sponsored" by some obscure company called "Red Bull." There was a Red Bull logo on the loading screen, and there were Red Bull ads scattered all over the track.

The thing is, they were advertisements like you'd expect to see at a raceway. It actually looked kind of cool. And it actually encouraged me to try the drink because I liked the game. (I ended up hating Red Bull though. Still do to this day.) But the in game ad in that format was no big deal. I saw it so often, it was just part of the background. No harm, no foul.

Then Wipeout HD came out on the PS3 with the Fury add on. It was an utterly fantastic game in all respects.

Until they started streaming ads on the loading screen. Not just a static logo mind you, but actual commercials with video and sound. This had the effect of actually slowing down the load time of the game, thereby forcing you to watch the ad.

That was not cool. The player base let the developers and the advertisers know, and the ads went away. That's the kind of ad that will get me to scream. If while waiting for the launch animation to complete I'm subjected to an ad that I can't avoid, I'll reach for the pitchfork. But if it's some text in Galnet, a scavenger hunt that I can do or not do because it has zero effect on the game, it doesn't bother me. If they add real-world companies to the holographic signs outside the station, I won't mind that either. It's up to me to stop and look at them. Advertising is already in the game, it's just for fictional companies (so far.) Seeing other passive ads won't change anything. And if it means a game I like to play keeps getting support, especially without a subscription fee, I'm good with it.

As long as it's not forced in your face, doesn't affect game play or performance, I think FD can do what they want to make money.

Edit: one other caveat. FD should be careful in the sponsors they do allow, because the wrong ones will, and I hate to use the term, break immersion. A graphics card company can squeak by. But an ad for the new Toyota Corolla or the hot new romantic comedy will burn up good will in a hurry. Hopefully if ads for current products DO become a thing, FD will have the good sense to choose carefully and make an effort to create ads that don't look out of place.

This is a very sensible point of view, i completely agree.
 
Back
Top Bottom