I do not understand the hysteria. The 10% is when you sell off equipment, not when you buy new. Thus if you upgrade any future ships, you will get the 10% salesman tax on the stock equipment no matter if you buy or sell anything now. But getting a large pricy shield at 78 Ursa now is sound advice indeed. I have a Clipper I can equip with a 7A shield while it is still discounted; I am going to do that.
It's very easy to understand. A lot of people re-purpose ships -- I use my anaconda for exploration and for killing pirates. with the 10% penalty, it will cost me well over $20 million to swap from exploration conda to pirate killing conda and back. So, it's not hysteria, but selling my parts now, instead of waiting for the penalty to kick in, saves me at least $20 million, and let's me figure out at my leisure how I want outfit my conda. Maybe I even go back to exploration, but I'm going to make that decision, not FD.
- - - Updated - - -
In the long run it will be worth having multiple ships for different roles which is fine IMO.
that may be great for you, but not for me.
When the delete ship storage (it's been in the works since day one), I'm sure you'll understand.
- - - Updated - - -
Converting that Conda to trader will make it back quickly enough....
.....y
8-10 hours just to make up the penalty is not really quick. I guess, if you spend all your time playing ED. I have a family, and a job. And, well, a life.
this panic is getting old and boring.... owners of bigger ships will just have to be a little more selective on purpose instead of re-commissioning the uber ship for each CG ... probably why everyone below Python ... just don't give a damn really
For someone who doesn't give a damn, you're really going through pains to weigh in on this !! how 'bout you REALLY show us how little you care and stop responding!!!