Coriolis Mail Slot Size / Size Ship Chart

Hi

Has anyone posted or seen a diagram showing the relative size of ships compared to the Coriolis station "mail slot" ?

Thanks
 
Hi

Has anyone posted or seen a diagram showing the relative size of ships compared to the Coriolis station "mail slot" ?

Thanks

I can tell you from personal experience that it's only a bit taller than a conda.
speaking of which, why on earth is this a "slot", shouldn't it be a circle.. from a mechanical/stress perspective, and from usability (the station is spinning, why is one orientation more "right" than another)?
Although I guess going full thruster and boost out of a circle looks a little less cooler than doing it through a slot.
 
It is a slot as it requires an 'in' and an 'out'. Red or green lights.

Which poses the question: Why is the advertising up side down?

Arry.
 
It is a slot as it requires an 'in' and an 'out'. Red or green lights.

Which poses the question: Why is the advertising up side down?

Arry.

Did you ever stop to think that maybe the advertising is the right way up and it you who is upside down?
 
The containment field is difficult to maintain and important to all life within the docking bay. It has to be that size/shape because they haven't bothered to try and advance the tech any further. /fakeloretoexplainthingsthatshouldntbeaskedabout
 
A rectangular slot provides better security against outside attacks (both natural - asteroids, debris, and man-made - lasers, missiles, kinetic weaponry), compared to a wide circle. Less of an opening, and the open area is not distributed uniformly around a center. The station rotation further provides a reduction of "open window" towards the inside, as with anything slow-moving, you'd either have to aim for the very small center that always stays open, or time your impactoid to match the slot's angle at the point of crossing.

So, in short, rectangular opening is more secure for the station.
 
It has been designed that way since the Thargoids were first discovered.

Previous stations did have round entrances, for precisely the engineering reasons the OP suggested. Unfortunately, this meant the octagonal Thargoid ships could enter "flat" with their bay doors (which are on the underside) opening straight into the station. Nightmare... because they didn't even have to dock - they just opened their doors at the entrance and dropped the munitions and seed pods straight in.

Ever since then, ALL stations have been redesigned with slot-shaped entrances, meaning larger vessels like Thargoids (but us as well) have to enter by driving forward through the slot - which means they'd actually have to be inside the station and then turn their ship in order to drop anything from their bay doors.
 
Last edited:
I can tell you from personal experience that it's only a bit taller than a conda.
speaking of which, why on earth is this a "slot", shouldn't it be a circle.. from a mechanical/stress perspective, and from usability (the station is spinning, why is one orientation more "right" than another)?
Although I guess going full thruster and boost out of a circle looks a little less cooler than doing it through a slot.

Imagine a ship 200m by 50 m a slot needs to be 10000 metre square to fit
.i
If it's a circle its 31420 metres square
.
The force field needs to cover an area 3 x the size and would need significantly more emitter to ensure coverage of a disc
 
Back
Top Bottom