Deleted member 38366
D
Deleted
--- Deleted ---
--- Deleted ---
Last edited by a moderator:
Poll/Query : How thorough of an Explorer were you so far ?
I'm at 1.52 average, so I'm not very thorough
I was sort of curious about this, I'll find out once I've sold all my data this evening.
I'm a cherry picker for sure. But I always scan the main star and bodies within a reasonable distance (~1kls) unless they are peasant icy/rocky nobodies that typically orbit the brown dwarfs. Unless they are far enough out to break orbit records, of course. Otherwise, I will go any distance for a water/earthlike/ammonia world and certain, interestingly colored/sized/ringed giants and whatnot.
I probably average about 2-3 per system, but I will have to wait until I finish my current expedition to say for sure.
I probably average about 2-3 per system, but I will have to wait until I finish my current expedition to say for sure.
1.5, I switch between tourist and scan frenzies.
Case in point: Trip to crab, was eager to reach it so that was go all the way.
On the way back, leisurely picking one system at a time to hop to, and scan if it's nice.
edit: Hmmm, since systems visited update right away, and scans only when sold, that number will go up.
Case in point: Trip to crab, was eager to reach it so that was go all the way.
On the way back, leisurely picking one system at a time to hop to, and scan if it's nice.
edit: Hmmm, since systems visited update right away, and scans only when sold, that number will go up.
Last edited:
3.1 for me.
It's a been mixture of scanning like mad and then doing 30 jumps without scanning.
A lot of the time I'll ping 35 objects and it'll all be asteroid fields and ice and rock. Other times I'll ping and the one that looks like a water world or earth-like will be 100,000ls away, late night and I want to finish the route I've plotted.
Other times I'll hang out, scan everything that doesn't look like rock and ice.
It's a been mixture of scanning like mad and then doing 30 jumps without scanning.
A lot of the time I'll ping 35 objects and it'll all be asteroid fields and ice and rock. Other times I'll ping and the one that looks like a water world or earth-like will be 100,000ls away, late night and I want to finish the route I've plotted.
Other times I'll hang out, scan everything that doesn't look like rock and ice.
what's the difference between level 2 & level 3 scans and which one should be higher?
Deleted member 38366
D
--- Deleted ---
Last edited by a moderator:
mine is around 3.5 at the moment but I have about 500 systems of unsold data from my current trip...
I tend to scan everything on the MOST PART... right now its nearing a month out and i have not passed 2K LY from sol yet and I am only just now starting to get a bit selective when it comes to systems with mostly icy or rocky in them... Maybe I will see out the rest of this week and try to reach my target nebula then head back for a break from the black...
I tend to explore using economical route once I am outside of the heavily explored belts...
I tend to scan everything on the MOST PART... right now its nearing a month out and i have not passed 2K LY from sol yet and I am only just now starting to get a bit selective when it comes to systems with mostly icy or rocky in them... Maybe I will see out the rest of this week and try to reach my target nebula then head back for a break from the black...
I tend to explore using economical route once I am outside of the heavily explored belts...
Last edited:
Level 2 would be scans without Detailed Surface Scanner and Level 3 those with Detailed Surface Scanner.
Technically, Level 3 should be higher for nearly all players - but the figures remain a tad buggy. At least they're not reading continously 0 since they did since Release
the only reason I ask is because of . . . .
Last edited:
Erm, does the detailed scans only update after selling since im currently at 0.11? Although this may well be right, I am deffo a tourist/racer type
My current unsold data however covers about 3000 systems since I was on about 3700 visited when I left on my current trip.
Profit (pre-current trip): 37,542,521
Visited: 6650
Level 2 scans: 95
Level 3 scans: 647
My current unsold data however covers about 3000 systems since I was on about 3700 visited when I left on my current trip.
Profit (pre-current trip): 37,542,521
Visited: 6650
Level 2 scans: 95
Level 3 scans: 647
I usually scan easy to reach "rares" only, neutron stars, black holes, and earth-likes as well as interesting water- or metal-worlds. Did you know that information about a single earth-like world in a blackhole/neutron binary system isn't worth one cent extra?
I forgot: 7980 systems visited so far, 7550 scans, so below 1.0
I forgot: 7980 systems visited so far, 7550 scans, so below 1.0
Last edited:
Hmm. Surprised myself with a 3.35.
Last edited:
