Scudmungus
Banned
1: Not racism.
2: It be prejudice.
3: Still not right.
2: It be prejudice.
3: Still not right.
Meta-gamers burn out very quickly in this game
- Thread starter Joel Elks
- Start date
- Status
thanks scud, your right prejudice would be the correct term.
i am sorry i just got so mad i could not find the right words.
Scudmungus
Banned
Aal gud, happens. Hopin it be added to Forum Rules.
Or maybi folks recognize wi aal gamers, regardless of de games wi be choosin to play
Robert Maynard
Volunteer Moderator
The thread has been closed.
It has been noted that participants have been resorting to name-calling relating to games that other participants may (or may not) have played. This is unacceptable and will not be permitted to continue. Posts past this point in time which continue this type of behaviour should be reported as insulting other members. To be clear, "go back to <insert game name here>" is not acceptable.
Another point to note - it is no surprise that some players of Elite: Dangerous have come from EVE in particular - the games share a genre and that there are many players who are passionate about one or both of these games should not come as a surprise to any of us. With Star Citizen also in development and well supported it seems that there is more than enough room in the galaxy for all three of these games (and more are in development). During the development of this game and now, post release, there are fairly regular posts requesting that this feature or that mechanic be added to the game, features and mechanics that seem to be sourced from EVE. As the design of E: D was put in place over two and a half years ago, when suggestions are made that would require the game to change direction (in some cases) from what the existing player-base has been expecting for a considerable time, friction can arise. That is not to say that that excuses any unacceptable reactions from players, rather it may go some way to explain why some participants seem to have a short fuse when particular features are requested (almost certainly not for the first, second or even third time).
It has been noted that participants have been resorting to name-calling relating to games that other participants may (or may not) have played. This is unacceptable and will not be permitted to continue. Posts past this point in time which continue this type of behaviour should be reported as insulting other members. To be clear, "go back to <insert game name here>" is not acceptable.
Another point to note - it is no surprise that some players of Elite: Dangerous have come from EVE in particular - the games share a genre and that there are many players who are passionate about one or both of these games should not come as a surprise to any of us. With Star Citizen also in development and well supported it seems that there is more than enough room in the galaxy for all three of these games (and more are in development). During the development of this game and now, post release, there are fairly regular posts requesting that this feature or that mechanic be added to the game, features and mechanics that seem to be sourced from EVE. As the design of E: D was put in place over two and a half years ago, when suggestions are made that would require the game to change direction (in some cases) from what the existing player-base has been expecting for a considerable time, friction can arise. That is not to say that that excuses any unacceptable reactions from players, rather it may go some way to explain why some participants seem to have a short fuse when particular features are requested (almost certainly not for the first, second or even third time).
Last edited:
- Status