Only available in small, extremely close range (500m) and very inaccurate. Doesn't seem at all worth it
New nickname "the Craptoscrambler"
The imperial hammer looks truly amazing though, slightly less damage for 3 shot rail gun with same ammo 30/90 and same power draw...everything else so far looks meh
Glorious. As soon as I get access (still at 3 weeks, 6 days), I intend to do a side-by-side comparison of the cytoscrambler and the regular fixed burst. If someone doesn't beat me to it, I'll be sure to post my results.The ?
Glorious. As soon as I get access (still at 3 weeks, 6 days),
You know in the first Elite i played on Speccy, mining laser was pretty goodJust tried it in a conflict zone and recorded the results. It seems marginally better than standard fixed burst if the following conditions are met:
- Your enemy is heavily shielded
- Your enemy is Python sized or larger
- Your enemy is much slower and less maneuvrable than you
- You are closer than 500m away
- You have a lot of spare weapons capacitance
In short, it's so situational as to be functionally useless. I'd say it's about on par with the mining laser in terms of usability
The Code just tested it versus a beam laser of the same size (c1) vs a python 4 pips in shield with 2 shield boosters and 'a' class shields. Weapons are at 0 pips and fired until capacitor charge runs out.
@ 481Meters
Cyto: 6%
Beam: 18%
@ 300 metres
Cyto: 12% damage
Beam: 18% damage
@100 metres
Cyto: 21%
Beam: 18%
50 Metres (we're bored):
Cyto: 21%
Beam: 18%
So... thanks for that weapon that does less damage than a beam except at stupid close range. Woooh.
Watch it in action here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2z1O_WDPBQ&feature=youtu.be